Abstract 11983: Oral Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes in Combination With Long-acting Insulin and the Risks of Myocardial Infarction and Stroke

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
James S Floyd ◽  
Kerri L Wiggins ◽  
Sascha Dublin ◽  
William T Longstreth ◽  
Nicholas L Smith ◽  
...  

Introduction/Hypothesis: The use of oral therapies in combination with insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes is common, but the cardiovascular risks or benefits are largely unknown. Among users of long-acting insulin, we conducted a population-based case-control study to evaluate the incident myocardial infarction (MI) and incident stroke risks associated with sulfonylurea and metformin use. We hypothesized that sulfonylurea use would be associated with elevated risk and metformin use with decreased risk. Methods: Cases were enrollees of Group Health Cooperative (GHC) with type 2 diabetes who used long-acting insulin at the time of diagnosis with a first MI (n=413) or first stroke (n=247) from 1995-2010. Controls (n=443) were randomly sampled GHC enrollees with type 2 diabetes who used long-acting insulin, matched to cases on age, sex, and calendar year. Sulfonylureas and metformin use was classified as current, past, or never using electronic pharmacy records. MI and stroke diagnoses and potential confounding variables were validated by medical record review. Analyses were adjusted for matching variables and cardiovascular risk factors, including smoking, duration of diabetes, blood pressure, and cholesterol. Results: Current use of sulfonylureas compared with never use was associated with a higher risk of MI (OR 1.67; 95% CI, 1.10-2.55) but not stroke (OR 1.22; 95% CI, 0.74-2.00). Current use of metformin compared with never use was associated with a lower risk of stroke (OR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.95) but not MI (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.44-1.33). Past use of sulfonylureas and past use of metformin were not associated with either outcome. Findings were robust to sensitivity analyses that tested assumptions about eligibility criteria and medication adherence. An unmeasured confounder associated with a 2-fold increased MI risk would have to be present in 70% more current users than never users of sulfonylureas to render the sulfonylurea-MI odds ratio null. Conclusions: The use of sulfonylureas in combination with long-acting insulin may increase the risk of MI compared with insulin alone. Our study adds to a growing body of evidence that metformin may be an effective cardiovascular disease prevention therapy, even when used with insulin.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Ting Yang ◽  
Kuan-Ying Li ◽  
Chen-Yi Yang ◽  
Huang-Tz Ou ◽  
Shihchen Kuo

Abstract Background: Little is known about the comparative vascular safety of basal insulin (intermediate-acting human insulin [IAHI] or long-acting insulin analogue [LAIA]) in type 2 diabetes. We sought to examine the vascular and hypoglycemic effects associated with IAHI versus LAIA in real-world patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We conducted a nationwide population-based, retrospective cohort study using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database to include patients with type 2 diabetes who stably used an IAHI (N=11,521) or LAIA (N=37,651) in the period 2004-2012. A rigorous three-step matching algorithm that considered the initiation date of basal insulin, previous exposure of antidiabetic treatments, comorbidities, diabetes severity and complications, and concomitant medications was applied to achieve the between-group comparability. Study outcomes, including composite cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), composite microvascular diseases (MVDs), and hypoglycemia, were assessed up to the end of 2013. Results: Baseline patient characteristics were balanced with the application of the matching scheme. Compared with LAIA, the use of IAHI was associated with greater risks of composite CVDs (adjusted hazard ratio: 1,79; 95% confidence interval: 1.20-2.67) and hospitalized hypoglycemia (1.82; 1.51-2.20), but a lower risk of composite MVDs (0.88; 0.84-0.91). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses showed a consistent trend of results with that in the primary analyses. Conclusions: The use of a basal insulin with IAHI versus LAIA among patients with type 2 diabetes in usual practice may be associated with a lower risk of MVDs, and strategies should be optimized for minimizing the risks of hypoglycemia and CVDs in this population.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Ting Yang ◽  
Kuan-Ying Li ◽  
Chen-Yi Yang ◽  
Huang-Tz Ou ◽  
Shihchen Kuo

AbstractLittle is known about the comparative vascular safety of basal insulins (intermediate-acting human insulin [IAHI] or long-acting insulin analogue [LAIA]) in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study sought to examine the vascular and hypoglycemic effects associated with IAHI versus LAIA in real-world patients with T2D. We utilized Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database to identify T2D patients who stably used IAHI (N = 11,521) or LAIA (N = 37,651) in the period 2004–2012. A rigorous three-step matching algorithm that considered the initiation date of basal insulin, previous exposure of antidiabetic treatments, comorbidities, diabetes severity and complications, and concomitant medications was applied to achieve the between-group comparability. Study outcomes, including cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), microvascular diseases (MVDs), and hypoglycemia, were assessed up to the end of 2013. Compared with LAIA, the use of IAHI was associated with greater risks of composite CVDs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20–2.67) and hospitalized hypoglycemia (aHR: 1.82; 95% CI 1.51–2.20), but a lower risk of composite MVDs (aHR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.84–0.91). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses showed a consistent trend of results with that in the primary analyses. In summary, although the use of IAHI versus LAIA among T2D patients in usual practice may be associated with a lower risk of MVDs, strategies should be optimized for minimizing the risks of hypoglycemia and CVDs in this population.


2008 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Monami ◽  
Niccolò Marchionni ◽  
Edoardo Mannucci

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard F. Pollock ◽  
Katrina M. Erny-Albrecht ◽  
Anupama Kalsekar ◽  
David Bruhn ◽  
William J. Valentine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document