Abstract 13004: The Effect of Vasopressor Agents in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Shock

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsukasa Yagi ◽  
Eizo Tachibana ◽  
Yasushi Ueki ◽  
Kazuo Sakamoto ◽  
Hiroshi Imamura ◽  
...  

Background: Various vasopressor agents are used for the treatment of cardiovascular shock. According to a randomized double-blind comparison study reported in 2010, norepinephrine is more useful than dopamine for patients in cardiovascular shock. In Japan, although both norepinephrine and dopamine are used as first-line vasopressor agents, the status of use and usefulness of the two agents have not yet been clarified. Methods: The Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) Shock Registry was a prospective, observational, multi-center, cohort study between May 2012 and June 2014.Of the patients registered in the JCS-Shock Registry, data of those who received norepinephrine or dopamine as a vasopressor agent, without the use of intra-aortic ballon pumping or cardiopulmonary bypass, were examined. The primary end point of the study was the rate of death at 30 days. Results: Of the 980 patients registered in the JCS-Shock Registry, the data of 320 patients were included in this analysis, after exclusion of patients who had not received the two agents and patients meeting the exclusion criteria. Of the 320 patients, 98 had received norepinephrine (N group), 142 had received dopamine (D group), and 80 had received both agents (N+D group). The acute mortality rates were 26.5, 25.4 and 46.2% in the N, D and N+D groups, respectively (p = 0.003). In a stratified analysis according to the renal function (eGFR [median: 43] ≥43 [normal renal function] versus eGFR <43 [reduced renal function]) at the time of admission, the acute mortality rates in the patients of the N, D and N+D groups with normal renal function were 7.8, 21.1 and 41.2%, respectively (p = 0.001), being significantly lower in the N group. On the other hand, the acute mortality rates in the patients of the N, D and N+D groups with reduced renal function were 46.8, 29.6 and 50.0%, respectively (p = 0.049), being significantly lower in the D group. Conclusion: Although norepinephrine is recommended as the first-line treatment, a trend towards more frequent use of dopamine was found in Japan. In addition, norepinephrine appeared to contribute to a reduction of the acute mortality in patients with normal renal function, while dopamine appeared to contribute to a reduction of the acute mortality in patients with reduced renal function.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsukasa Yagi ◽  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Eizo Tachibana ◽  
Naohiro Yonemoto ◽  
Kazuo Sakamoto ◽  
...  

According to the guidelines for cardiogenic shock, norepinephrine is associated with fewer arrhythmias than dopamine and may be the better first-line vasopressor agent. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of norepinephrine vs. dopamine as first-line vasopressor agent for cardiovascular shock depending on the presence and severity of renal dysfunction at hospitalization. This was a secondary analysis of the prospective, multicenter Japanese Circulation Society Cardiovascular Shock Registry (JCS Shock Registry) conducted between 2012 and 2014, which included patients with shock complicating emergency cardiovascular disease at hospital arrival. The analysis included 240 adult patients treated with norepinephrine alone (n = 98) or dopamine alone (n = 142) as the first-line vasopressor agent. Primary endpoint was mortality at 30 days after hospital arrival. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics, including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and similar 30-day mortality rates. The analysis of the relationship between 30-day mortality rate after hospital arrival and vasopressor agent used in patients categorized according to the eGFR-based chronic kidney disease classification revealed that norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor agent might be associated with better prognosis of cardiovascular shock in patients with mildly compromised renal function at admission (0.0 vs. 22.6%; P = 0.010) and that dopamine as the first-line vasopressor agent might be beneficial for cardiovascular shock in patients with severely compromised renal function [odds ratio; 0.22 (95% confidence interval 0.05–0.88; P = 0.032)]. Choice of first-line vasopressor agent should be based on renal function at hospital arrival for patients in cardiovascular shock.Clinical Trial Registration:http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/, Unique identifier: 000008441.


2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenda Ramalho Barbudo-Selmi ◽  
Marileda Bonafim Carvalho ◽  
André Luis Selmi ◽  
Silvio Emílio Cuevas Martins

The purpose of this study was to evaluate periodontal disease (PD) in dogs with chronic renal failure (CRF) and to compare it to PD in dogs with normal renal function (NRF). Twelve dogs with CRF and 24 dogs with NRF, all presenting dental pocket formation, were compared. In all dogs, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, urine specific gravity and total red and white blood cells were determined. A complete oral examination was also performed including evaluation of bacterial plaque, gingivitis, gingival recession, pocket, calculus, dental mobility, dental loss, and ulcers. These data were used to calculate plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI) and periodontal destruction index (PDI). PD was graded as mild, moderate or severe based on the results. Mild, moderate or severe PD was observed in dogs with NRF, whereas dogs with CRF presented either mild or severe PD. Dogs with NRF showed higher involvement of the maxillary teeth, whereas dogs with CRF showed a higher involvement of the mandibular teeth. Plaque index was significantly higher in dogs with NRF. It was concluded that lesion distribution and periodontal disease progression may be altered in dogs with CRF, and gingival inflammatory response differs in dogs with NRF and CRF regarding to the stage of periodontal disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document