Abstract 18396: Low Rate of LDL-Goal-Attainment in 57,855 High-Risk-Patients in Europe, Canada, South-Africa, Middle East and China - Results of DYSIS

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anselm K Gitt ◽  
Dominik Lautsch ◽  
Martin Horack ◽  
Baishali Ambegaonkar ◽  
Jean Ferrieres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Goal Attainment ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Statin Treatment ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Very High

Background: Statin treatment is routinely used for secondary prevention world-wide. Little is known about the prevalence of persistent lipid abnormalities under chronic statin treatment for secondary prevention and possible differences in LDL-Cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment in clinical practice between countries in different parts of the world. Methods: Between 2008 and 2012, consecutive statin-treated outpatients were enrolled in 26 countries worldwide, (DYSIS = Dyslipidemia International Study; list of countries in table) to assess LDL-C goal attainment for secondary prevention. European Society of Cardiology recommendations were used to classify patient risk, and to define LDL-cholesterol treatment goals. Data were collected under real life conditions in physicians’ offices and hospital outpatient wards. Results: Serum lipid values of 57,885 consecutive statin-treated outpatients were studied in the context of their cardiovascular risk factors, and the potency and composition of their lipid-lowering treatment. In the very-high risk patients only 21.7% did reach the currently recommended LDL-Chol target <70mg/dl with large differences between the countries varying from 9.2% to 44.3%. In the high-risk population the LDL-Chol target <100mg/dl was achieved in 38.0% oft he patients, varying between 16.6% and 66.7% between countries Conclusion: Despite chronic statin treatment, only 21.7% of the very-high-risk patients reached the current recommended LDL-Chol target <70mg/dl in this large multinational cross-sectional trial, highlighting the persistent large gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice. Further treatment escalations are necessary to reduce the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events.

The role of ezetimibe in LDL cholesterol goal attainment in very high risk patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1961-1961
Author(s):  
Dimitri P. Mikhailidis ◽  
Richard W. Lawson ◽  
Anna-Louise McCormick ◽  
Gillian C. Sibbring ◽  
Andrew M. Tershakovec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Goal Attainment ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Cholesterol Goal ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Very High

Abstract P275: Demographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Defined by National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III Guidelines

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David M Kern ◽  
Sanjeev Balu ◽  
Ozgur Tunceli ◽  
Swetha Raparla ◽  
Deborah Anzalone
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Low Hdl ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Very High ◽  
Statin Use

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with different risk factors for CHD as defined by NCEP ATP III guidelines. Methods: Dyslipidemia patients (≥1 medical claim for dyslipidemia, ≥1 pharmacy claim for a statin, or ≥1 LDL-C value ≥100 mg/dL [index date]) aged ≥18 y were identified from the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment from 1/1/2007-7/31/2012. Patients were classified as low risk (0 or 1 risk factor): hypertension, age ≥45 y [men] or ≥55 y [women], or low HDL-C), moderate/moderately high risk (≥2 risk factors), high risk (having CHD or CHD risk equivalent), or very high risk (having ACS or other established cardiovascular disease plus diabetes or metabolic syndrome). Demographics, comorbidities, medication use and lipid levels during the 12 months prior, and statin use during the 6 months post-index date were compared across risk groups (very high vs each other risk group). Results: There were 1,524,351 low-risk (mean age: 47 y; 45% men), 242,357 moderate-risk (mean age: 58 y; 59% men), 188,222 high-risk (mean age: 57 y; 52% men), and 57,469 very-high-risk (mean age: 63 y; 61% men) patients identified. Mean Deyo-Charlson comorbidity score differed greatly across risk strata: 0.20, 0.33, 1.26, and 2.22 from low to very high risk (p<.0001 for each). Compared with high-risk patients, very-high-risk patients had a higher rate of ischemic stroke: 5.4% vs 4.1%; peripheral artery disease: 17.1% vs 11.6%; coronary artery disease: 8.5% vs 8.2%; and abdominal aortic aneurysm: 2.3% vs 2.0% (p<.05 for each). Less than 1% of the total population had a prior prescription for each non-statin lipid-lowering medication (bile acid sequestrants, fibrates, ezetimibe, niacin, and omega-3). Very-high-risk patients had lower total cholesterol (very-high-risk mean: 194 mg/dL vs 207, 205, and 198 mg/dL for low-, moderate-/moderately-high-, and high-risk patients, respectively) and LDL-C (very-high-risk mean: 110 mg/dL vs 126, 126, and 116 mg/dL for the other risk groups; p<.0001 for each); higher triglycerides (TG) (very-high-risk mean: 206 mg/dL vs 123, 177, and 167 mg/dL for the other groups; p<.0001 for each); and lower HDL-C (very-high-risk mean: 45 mg/dL vs 57 [p<.0001], 45 [p=.006], and 51 mg/dL [p<.0001]). Statin use was low overall (15%), but higher in the very-high-risk group (45%) vs the high- (29%), moderate-/moderately-high- (18%), and low- (12%) risk groups (p<.0001 for each). Conclusions: Despite a large proportion of patients having high lipid levels, statin use after a dyslipidemia diagnosis was low: ≥80% of all patients (and more than half at very high risk) failed to receive a statin, indicating a potentially large population of patients who could benefit from statin treatment. Prior use of non-statin lipid-lowering medications was also low considering the high TG and low HDL-C levels among high-risk patients.

The new LDL-C target <55 mg/dL is achieved by less than 40% of very high risk patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia despite receiving PCSK9 inhibitors: real world data

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Rallidis ◽  
C Vlachopoulos ◽  
E Liberopoulos ◽  
I Skoumas ◽  
E Kiouri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Familial Hypercholesterolaemia ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Additional Risk Factor ◽  
Pcsk9 Inhibitors ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Lipid Clinic ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background The recently published ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias have lowered the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target in the very high risk patients below 55 mg/dL. Purpose To examine how achievable is this target in very high risk patients receiving a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) on top of lipid-lowering treatment (LLT). Methods The cohort comprised 158 patients who attended the lipid clinic of 3 hospitals in Greece and started treatment with PCSK9i. Patients were requested to attend the lipid clinic 3 months after the initiation of PCSK9i. Results Ninety percent of patients had heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (heFH) and 75% had cardiovascular disease (CVD). One hundred forty patients were classified as very high risk because they had either cardiovascular disease (CVD) or heFH with an additional risk factor for whom a target &lt;55 mg/dL is currently recommended. Of those very high risk patients, 105 (75%) were given PCSK9i due to failure to achieve LDL-C targets despite maximum LLT (high intensity statin at maximum tolerated dose + ezetimibe) while in the rest of cases the indication was statin intolerance. The mean reduction of LDL-C at 3 months was 56.2%. Among 105 very high risk patients (all had heFH), LDL-C below 55 mg/dL was achieved by 37.1% while the previously LDL-C target &lt;70 mg/dL was achieved by 60% (Figure 1). Conclusions The new LDL-C target &lt;55 mg/dL is achieved by &lt;40% of very high risk patients with heFH despite receiving triple LLT, i.e. PCSK9i + statin + ezetimibe. This therapeutic gap suggests that there is still need for more effective LLT in very high risk heFH patients to maximize their clinical benefit. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

P643Association of adherence and treatment intensity of lipid-lowering therapy with cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in very high-risk patients in Germany

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Khachatryan ◽  
B Monga ◽  
E Sidelnikov ◽  
M Hatz ◽  
I Ahrens
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcomes ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Treatment Intensity ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Very High

Abstract Introduction Both intensity and adherence to lipid lowering therapies (LLT) play an important role in effectiveness of the therapies in patients at risk for cardiovascular events. Purpose To evaluate the association of adherence and treatment intensity with cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in very high-risk patients (as defined by the current ESC guidelines) treated with statin and/or ezetimibe. Methods Retrospective cohort study was based on German health claims data (2010–2015) obtained from German Institute for Health Research (InGef) database and included patients ≥18 years with an initial LLT treatment (statin and/or ezetimibe) in 2011–2013, and diagnoses of cardiovascular disease (CVD), stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients must have had at least 2 LLT prescriptions in the first year to ensure intention of treatment. Follow-up period started 1 year after the second LLT prescription and continued until one of the events of the composite study endpoint (hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, unstable angina, ischemic stroke, heart failure, revascularization, or all-cause death) or 31.12.2015, whichever occurred earlier. Adherence was measured annually by the proportion of days covered (PDC) using prescription data. Treatment intensity was quantified based on expected LDL-C reduction as described in the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2018 guidelines. Adherence and treatment intensity were multiplied to create a combined measure of intensity after accounting for adherence. Results 73,257 patients of the CVD cohort were 68 (SD=12) years old, 59% men; the DM cohort (no CVD) had 13,584 patients, age 64 (10), 47% men; 472 patients in the CKD cohort (no CVD) were 65 (15) years old, 46% men. In a Cox proportional hazards model, each 10% increase in treatment intensity (LDL-C lowering) was associated with 18% lower risk of CV event in the CVD (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.82–0.83), 21% - in the DM (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.76–0.83), and 15% - in the CKD (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75–0.97) cohorts. Similarly, each 10% increase in adherence (PDC) was associated with 6% lower risk of CV event in the CVD (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.93–0.94), 7% - in the DM (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91–0.94), and 7% - in the CKD (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.97) cohorts. Each 10% increase in adherence-adjusted intensity was associated with 16% lower risk of CV event in the CVD (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.83 - 0.85), 19% - in the DM (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78–0.85), and 17% - in the CKD (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.96) cohorts. The models controlled for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index and other cardiovascular risk factors at baseline. Conclusions A higher adherence and/or treatment intensity of LLT was associated with significantly lower risk of CV outcomes or all-cause death in German very high-risk patients. Strategies to tailor intensity to patient profile and improve adherence could further lower risk of CV events. Acknowledgement/Funding Amgen Europe GmbH

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document