scholarly journals Validation of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance–Derived Equation for Predicted Left Ventricular Mass Using the UK Biobank Imaging Cohort

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Fung ◽  
Caitlin Cheshire ◽  
Jackie A. Cooper ◽  
Pedro Catarino ◽  
Stefan K. Piechnik ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avan Suinesiaputra ◽  
Mihir M. Sanghvi ◽  
Nay Aung ◽  
Jose Miguel Paiva ◽  
Filip Zemrak ◽  
...  

Hypertension ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 750-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saul G. Myerson ◽  
Nicholas G. Bellenger ◽  
Dudley J. Pennell

Author(s):  
Shaan Khurshid ◽  
Samuel Friedman ◽  
James P. Pirruccello ◽  
Paolo Di Achille ◽  
Nathaniel Diamant ◽  
...  

Background: Classical methods for detecting left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) using 12-lead ECGs are insensitive. Deep learning models using ECG to infer cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived LV mass may improve LVH detection. Methods: Within 32 239 individuals of the UK Biobank prospective cohort who underwent CMR and 12-lead ECG, we trained a convolutional neural network to predict CMR-derived LV mass using 12-lead ECGs (left ventricular mass-artificial intelligence [LVM-AI]). In independent test sets (UK Biobank [n=4903] and Mass General Brigham [MGB, n=1371]), we assessed correlation between LVM-AI predicted and CMR-derived LV mass and compared LVH discrimination using LVM-AI versus traditional ECG-based rules (ie, Sokolow-Lyon, Cornell, lead aVL rule, or any ECG rule). In the UK Biobank and an ambulatory MGB cohort (MGB outcomes, n=28 612), we assessed associations between LVM-AI predicted LVH and incident cardiovascular outcomes using age- and sex-adjusted Cox regression. Results: LVM-AI predicted LV mass correlated with CMR-derived LV mass in both test sets, although correlation was greater in the UK Biobank (r=0.79) versus MGB (r=0.60, P<0.001 for both). When compared with any ECG rule, LVM-AI demonstrated similar LVH discrimination in the UK Biobank (LVM-AI c-statistic 0.653 [95% CI, 0.608 -0.698] versus any ECG rule c-statistic 0.618 [95% CI, 0.574 -0.663], P=0.11) and superior discrimination in MGB (0.621; 95% CI, 0.592 -0.649 versus 0.588; 95% CI, 0.564 -0.611, P=0.02). LVM-AI-predicted LVH was associated with incident atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and ventricular arrhythmias. Conclusions: Deep learning-inferred LV mass estimates from 12-lead ECGs correlate with CMR-derived LV mass, associate with incident cardiovascular disease, and may improve LVH discrimination compared to traditional ECG rules.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document