Abstract 032: Is Bigger Data Better? Predicting Readmissions in Acute Myocardial Infarction on Admission versus Discharge With Electronic Health Record Data

Author(s):  
Oanh K Nguyen ◽  
Anil N Makam ◽  
Christopher Clark ◽  
Song Zhang ◽  
Sandeep R Das ◽  
...  

Background: Readmissions after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are common, but the few available risk prediction models have poor predictive ability. Including more data from hospitalization may improve risk prediction. Objectives: To assess if an AMI-specific electronic health record (EHR) readmission risk prediction model derived and validated from data through the entire hospital course (‘full stay’ model) outperforms a model using data available only from the first day of hospitalization (‘first day’ model). Methods: EHR data from AMI hospitalizations from 6 diverse hospitals in north Texas from 2009-2010 were used to derive a model predicting all-cause non-elective 30-day readmissions which was then validated using five-fold cross-validation. Results: Of 826 consecutive index AMI admissions, 13% were followed by a 30-day readmission. History of diabetes (AOR 2.41, 95% CI 1.37-4.24), SBP <100 mmHg on admission (AOR 2.18, 95% CI 1.68-2.82), elevated Cr (≥2 mg/dL) on admission (AOR 2.56, 95% CI 2.52-6.08), elevated BNP on admission (AOR 6.36, 95% CI 1.65-24.47) and lack of PCI within 24 hours of admission (AOR 1.31, 95% CI 1.02-1.69) were significant predictors of readmission. Our ‘first-day’ AMI readmissions model based on these predictors had good discrimination ( Table ). Adding three other variables from the hospital course - use of IV diuretics (AOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.07-2.31), anemia (hematocrit ≤ 33%) on discharge (AOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.20-3.46), and discharge to post-acute care (AOR 1.50, 95% CI 0.90-2.50) - improved discrimination of the ‘full stay’ AMI model but only modestly improved net reclassification and calibration. Conclusions: A ‘full-stay’ AMI-specific EHR readmission model modestly outperformed a ‘first-day’ EHR model, a multi-condition EHR model, and the CMS AMI model. Surprisingly, incorporating more hospitalization data improved discrimination of the full-stay AMI model but did not meaningfully improve reclassification compared to the first-day model. Readmissions in AMI may be accurately predicted on the first day of hospitalization; waiting until later in hospitalization does not markedly improve risk prediction.

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 576-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan R. Enriquez ◽  
James A. de Lemos ◽  
Shailja V. Parikh ◽  
DaJuanicia N. Simon ◽  
Laine E. Thomas ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Oanh K Nguyen ◽  
Anil N Makam ◽  
Christopher Clark ◽  
Song Zhang ◽  
Sandeep R Das ◽  
...  

Background: Readmissions after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are common, but the few available risk prediction models have poor predictive ability and are not readily usable in real-time. Objectives: To develop and validate an AMI readmission risk prediction model from electronic health record (EHR) data available on the first day of hospitalization, and to compare model performance to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) AMI model and a validated multi-condition EHR model. Methods: EHR data from AMI readmissions from 6 diverse hospitals in north Texas from 2009-2010 were used to derive a model predicting all-cause non-elective 30-day readmissions to any of 75 hospitals in the region, which was then validated using five-fold cross-validation. Results: Of 826 consecutive index AMI admissions, 13% were followed by a 30-day readmission. The AMI READMITS score included seven predictors, all ascertainable within the first 24 hours of hospitalization ( Table 1A ). The AMI READMITS score was strongly associated with 30-day readmission in our cross-validation cohort: ≤13 points = extremely low risk (bottom quintile, mean predicted risk 3%); 14-15 points = low risk (4 th quintile, predicted risk 7%); 16-17 points = moderate risk (3 rd quintile, predicted risk 11%); 18-19 points = high risk (2 nd quintile, predicted risk 16%); and ≥20 points = extremely high risk (top quintile, predicted risk 35%). The READMITS score had good discrimination with comparable performance to the CMS model in our cohort; it had improved discrimination, reclassification, and calibration compared to a multi-condition EHR model ( Table 1B ). Conclusions: The AMI READMITS score accurately stratifies patients hospitalized with AMI into groups at varying risk of 30-day readmission. Unlike claims-based models which require data not available until after discharge, READMITS is parsimonious, easy to implement, and leverages actionable real-time data available from the EHR within the first 24 hours of hospitalization to enable early prospective identification of high-risk AMI patients for targeted readmissions reduction interventions.


BMC Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Pasea ◽  
Sheng-Chia Chung ◽  
Mar Pujades-Rodriguez ◽  
Anoop D. Shah ◽  
Samantha Alvarez-Madrazo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Clinical guidelines and public health authorities lack recommendations on scalable approaches to defining and monitoring the occurrence and severity of bleeding in populations prescribed antithrombotic therapy. Methods We examined linked primary care, hospital admission and death registry electronic health records (CALIBER 1998–2010, England) of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina or stable angina with the aim to develop algorithms for bleeding events. Using the developed bleeding phenotypes, Kaplan-Meier plots were used to estimate the incidence of bleeding events and we used Cox regression models to assess the prognosis for all-cause mortality, atherothrombotic events and further bleeding. Results We present electronic health record phenotyping algorithms for bleeding based on bleeding diagnosis in primary or hospital care, symptoms, transfusion, surgical procedures and haemoglobin values. In validation of the phenotype, we estimated a positive predictive value of 0.88 (95% CI 0.64, 0.99) for hospitalised bleeding. Amongst 128,815 patients, 27,259 (21.2%) had at least 1 bleeding event, with 5-year risks of bleeding of 29.1%, 21.9%, 25.3% and 23.4% following diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina and stable angina, respectively. Rates of hospitalised bleeding per 1000 patients more than doubled from 1.02 (95% CI 0.83, 1.22) in January 1998 to 2.68 (95% CI 2.49, 2.88) in December 2009 coinciding with the increased rates of antiplatelet and vitamin K antagonist prescribing. Patients with hospitalised bleeding and primary care bleeding, with or without markers of severity, were at increased risk of all-cause mortality and atherothrombotic events compared to those with no bleeding. For example, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 1.98 (95% CI 1.86, 2.11) for primary care bleeding with markers of severity and 1.99 (95% CI 1.92, 2.05) for hospitalised bleeding without markers of severity, compared to patients with no bleeding. Conclusions Electronic health record bleeding phenotyping algorithms offer a scalable approach to monitoring bleeding in the population. Incidence of bleeding has doubled in incidence since 1998, affects one in four cardiovascular disease patients, and is associated with poor prognosis. Efforts are required to tackle this iatrogenic epidemic.


2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Klompas ◽  
Chaim Kirby ◽  
Jason McVetta ◽  
Paul Oppedisano ◽  
John Brownstein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document