Abstract 132: Cost-Effectiveness of Stress Echocardiography and Long-Term Outcomes in Framingham Risk Score Stratified Patients with Non-anginal Chest Pain, Normal ECG and Normal Cardiac Biomarkers

Author(s):  
Arun Padala ◽  
Chandra Ojha ◽  
Micheal Shea ◽  
Mikhail Torosoff

Background: We investigated cost-effectiveness of stress echocardiography (SE) and long-term outcomes in Framingham risk score (FRS) stratified patients referred for stress testing after having presented with non-anginal chest pain, normal ECG, normal cardiac biomarkers. Material and Methods: Of 619 consecutive patients, 238 patients with complete dataset were divided into groups based on the interquartile range of the FRS (Table). Cost per CAD diagnosis was inferred based on post-test likelihood of CAD assuming accepted clinical practice of cardiac catheterization in patients with a SE demonstrating inducible ischemia. Long-term outcomes were ascertained using the Social Security Death Index and hospital records. Cause of death was identified in all but 3 patients. Chi-square test and analysis of variance were used to analyse categorical and continuous variables. Results: Study population consisted of 48% females, 52+/- 12 years old, 23% diabetics, and 40% current smokers. Intermediate and high FRS patients were more likely to develop ischemia by SE (4% vs. 9% in higher FRS, p<0.05, Table). When post-test likelihood of CAD was considered, four-fold higher relative value units (RVUs) per single case CAD diagnosis was needed in patients with low FRS (Table). No cardiovascular deaths were recorded during the mean follow-up of 60+/-12 months. While FRS≥0.216 was associated with 4-fold higher mortality, it was not affected by stress tests results. Most common causes of death were renal, pulmonary, and hepatic failure. Conclusion: In patients presenting with non-anginal chest pain, normal EKG and normal biomarkers, long-term follow-up suggests very low cardiovascular mortality. In this patient population further stratification by stress testing does not aid in predicting cardiovascular outcomes nor is it cost-efficient. For differences vs. CAD patients: p<0.05; †) p<0.01; ‡) p<0.005; §) p<0.001; blank - NS.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanna Pelà ◽  
Marina Aiello ◽  
Matteo Goldoni ◽  
Chiara Cavalli ◽  
Felice Perrino ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Most patients who had COVID-19 are still symptomatic after many months post infection, but the long-term outcomes are not yet well-defined. The aim of our prospective/retrospective study was to define the cardiac sequelae of COVID-19 infection. Methods and results This monocentric cohort study included 160 consecutive patients (64 females, 60 + 12 years) who had been discharged from the ward or from the outpatient clinic after a diagnosis of COVID-19 and subsequently referred for a follow-up visit. Clinical features as well as lab and instrumental data about the acute phase of the disease, such as haemodynamic instability (HI), cardiac biomarkers, d-dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), high resolution CT (HRCT) score along with information about the follow-up visit, including ECG and Conventional and Doppler Tissue Echocardiographic (DTE) parameters, were recorded. The median follow-up time after symptom onset was 5 months. At follow-up visit, the majority of the patients reported dyspnoea and asthenia. Moreover, echocardiography showed morpho-functional changes of both right (RV) and left (LV) ventricles, such as RV dilation, increased pressure in the pulmonary circulation, and by-ventricular systolic–diastolic dysfunction. When examined using multivariate analysis, independent of age, sex, and co-morbidities, RV and LV changes were significantly associated (P &lt; 0.05) with HRCT score and HI and with CRP, respectively. Conclusions Our results suggest that COVID-19 may impact RV and LV differently. Notably, the extent of the pneumonia and HI may affect RV, whereas the inflammatory status may influence LV. A long-term follow-up is warranted to refine and customize the most appropriate therapeutic strategies.


VASA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-274
Author(s):  
Dagmar Krajíčková ◽  
Antonín Krajina ◽  
Miroslav Lojík ◽  
Martina Mulačová ◽  
Martin Vališ

Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is a major cause of stroke and yet there are currently no proven effective treatments for it. The SAMMPRIS trial, comparing aggressive medical management alone with aggressive medical management combined with intracranial angioplasty and stenting, was prematurely halted when an unexpectedly high rate of periprocedural events was found in the endovascular arm. The goal of our study is to report the immediate and long-term outcomes of patients with ≥ 70 % symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis treated with balloon angioplasty and stent placement in a single centre. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective review of 37 consecutive patients with 42 procedures of ballon angioplasty and stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (≥ 70 % stenosis) treated between 1999 and 2012. Technical success (residual stenosis ≤ 50 %), periprocedural success (no vascular complications within 72 hours), and long-term outcomes are reported. Results: Technical and periprocedural success was achieved in 90.5 % of patients. The within 72 hours periprocedural stroke/death rate was 7.1 % (4.8 % intracranial haemorrhage), and the 30-day stroke/death rate was 9.5 %. Thirty patients (81 %) had clinical follow-up at ≥ 6 months. During follow-up, 5 patients developed 6 ischemic events; 5 of them (17 %) were ipsilateral. The restenosis rate was 27 %, and the retreatment rate was 12 %. Conclusions: Our outcomes of the balloon angioplasty/stent placement for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis are better than those in the SAMMPRIS study and compare favourably with those in large registries and observational studies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Lauritzen ◽  
H.J Vodstrup ◽  
T.D Christensen ◽  
M Onat ◽  
R Christensen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc have utility in predicting long-term outcomes. However, it is currently unknown if the same holds for patients undergoing surgical ablation. Purpose To determine whether CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc predict long-term outcomes after surgical ablation in concomitance with other cardiac surgery. Methods In this prospective, follow-up study, we included patients who underwent biatrial ablation - or pulmonary vein isolation procedure concomitantly with other cardiac surgery between 2004 and 2018. CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were assessed prior to surgery and categorized in groups as 0–1, 2–4 or ≥5. Outcomes were death, AF, and AF-related death. Follow-up was ended in April 2019. Results A total of 587 patients with a mean age of 68.7±0.4 years were included. Both CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were predictors of survival p=0.005 and p&lt;0.001, respectively (Figure). For CHADS2, mean survival times were 5.9±3.7 years for scores 0–1, 5.0±3.0 years for scores 2–4 and 4.3±2.6 years for scores ≥5. For CHA2DS2-VASc mean survival times were 7.3±4.0 years for scores 0–1, 5.6±2.9 years for scores 2–4 and 4.8±2.1 years for scores ≥5. The incidence of death was 20.1% for CHADS2 0–1, 24.8% for CHADS2 2–4, and 35.3% for CHADS2 ≥5, p=0.186. The incidence of AF was 50.2% for CHADS2 0–1, 47.9% for CHADS2 2–4, and 76.5% for CHADS2 ≥5, p=0.073. The incidence of AF related death was 13.0% for CHADS2 0–1, 16.8% for CHADS2 2–4, and 35.3% for CHADS2 ≥5, p=0.031. The incidence of death was 16.8% for CHA2DS2-VASc 0–1, 26.2% for CHA2DS2-VASc 2–4, and 45.0% for CHA2DS2-VASc ≥5, p=0.001. The incidence of AF was 49.6% for CHA2DS2-VASc 0–1, 52.5% for CHA2DS2-VASc 2–4, and 72.5% for CHA2DS2-VASc ≥5, p=0.035. The incidence of AF related death was 12.2% for CHA2DS2-VASc 0–1, 16.0% for CHA2DS2-VASc 2–4, and 42.5% for CHA2DS2-VASc ≥5, p&lt;0.001. Conclusion Both CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores predict long-term outcomes after surgical ablation for AF. However, CHA2DS2-VASc was superior in predicting death, AF, and AF-related death. Survival curves Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Maxi Weber ◽  
Sarah Schumacher ◽  
Wiebke Hannig ◽  
Jürgen Barth ◽  
Annett Lotzin ◽  
...  

Abstract Several types of psychological treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are considered well established and effective, but evidence of their long-term efficacy is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes across psychological treatments for PTSD. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PTSDpubs, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, and related articles were searched for randomized controlled trials with at least 12 months of follow-up. Twenty-two studies (N = 2638) met inclusion criteria, and 43 comparisons of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) were available at follow-up. Active treatments for PTSD yielded large effect sizes from pretest to follow-up and a small controlled effect size compared with non-directive control groups at follow-up. Trauma-focused treatment (TFT) and non-TFT showed large improvements from pretest to follow-up, and effect sizes did not significantly differ from each other. Active treatments for comorbid depressive symptoms revealed small to medium effect sizes at follow-up, and improved PTSD and depressive symptoms remained stable from treatment end to follow-up. Military personnel, low proportion of female patients, and self-rated PTSD measures were associated with decreased effect sizes for PTSD at follow-up. The findings suggest that CBT for PTSD is efficacious in the long term. Future studies are needed to determine the lasting efficacy of other psychological treatments and to confirm benefits beyond 12-month follow-up.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document