scholarly journals Ninety-Minute Exclusion of Acute Myocardial Infarction By Use of Quantitative Point-of-Care Testing of Myoglobin and Troponin I

Circulation ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 104 (13) ◽  
pp. 1483-1488 ◽  
Author(s):  
James McCord ◽  
Richard M. Nowak ◽  
Peter A. McCullough ◽  
Craig Foreback ◽  
Steven Borzak ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 1604-1609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred S Apple ◽  
F Philip Anderson ◽  
Paul Collinson ◽  
Robert L Jesse ◽  
Michael C Kontos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Validation of whole blood, point-of-care testing devices for monitoring cardiac markers to aid clinicians in ruling in and ruling out myocardial infarction (MI) is necessary for both laboratory and clinical acceptance. Methods: This study evaluated the clinical diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the First Medical Cardiac Test device operated by nursing and laboratory personnel that simultaneously measures cardiac troponin I (cTnI), creatine kinase (CK) MB, myoglobin, and total CK on the Alpha Dx analyzer in whole blood for detection of MI. Over a 6-month period, 369 patients initially presenting to the emergency department with chest pain were evaluated for MI using modified WHO criteria. Eighty-nine patients (24%) were diagnosed with MI. Results: In whole blood samples collected at admission and at 3- to 6-h intervals over 24 h, ROC curve-determined MI decision limits were as follows: cTnI, 0.4 μg/L; CKMB, 7.0 μg/L; myoglobin, 180 μg/L; total CK, 190 μg/L. Based on peak concentrations within 24 h after presentation, the following sensitivities (± 95% confidence intervals) were found: cTnI, 93% ± 5.5%; myoglobin, 81% ± 9.7%; CKMB, 90% ± 6.3%; total CK, 86% ± 7.5%. Sensitivities were maximal at >90% for both cTnI and CKMB at >12 h in MI patients, without differences between ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation MI patients. Conclusions: The First Medical point-of-care device provides cardiac marker assays that can be used by laboratories and clinicians in a variety of hospital settings for ruling in and ruling out MI.


2011 ◽  
Vol 135 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-463
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Lee-Lewandrowski ◽  
James L Januzzi ◽  
Ricky Grisson ◽  
Asim A Mohammed ◽  
Grant Lewandrowski ◽  
...  

Abstract Context.—Previous studies evaluating point-of-care testing (POCT) for cardiac biomarkers did not use current recommendations for troponin cutoff values or recognize the recent universal definition of acute myocardial infarction. Traditionally, achieving optimal sensitivity for the detection of myocardial injury on initial presentation required combining cardiac troponin and/or creatine kinase isoenzyme MB with an early marker, usually myoglobin. In recent years, the performance of central laboratory combining cardiac troponin assays has improved significantly, potentially obviating the need for a multimarker panel to achieve optimum sensitivity. Objective.—To compare 2 commonly used POCT strategies to a fourth generation, central laboratory cardiac troponin T assay on first-draw specimens from patients being evaluated for acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department. The 2 strategies included a traditional POCT multimarker panel and a newer POCT method using cardiac troponin I alone. Design.—Blood specimens from 204 patients presenting to the emergency department with signs and/or symptoms of myocardial ischemia were measured on the 2 POCT systems and by a central laboratory method. The diagnosis for each patient was determined by retrospective chart review. Results.—The cardiac troponin T assasy alone was more sensitive for acute myocardial infarction than the multimarker POCT panel with equal or better specificity. When compared with a POCT troponin I, the cardiac troponin T was also more sensitive, but this difference was not significant. The POCT troponin I alone also had the same sensitivity as the multimarker panel. Conclusions.—Testing for combining cardiac troponin alone using newer, commercially available, central laboratory or POCT assays performed with equal or greater sensitivity to acute myocardial infarction as the older, traditional, multimarker panel. In the near future, high-sensitivity, central laboratory troponins will be available for routine clinical use. As a result, the quality gap between central laboratories and older POCT methods will continue to widen, unless the performance of the POCT methods is improved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document