Abstract P166: Sex And Age Differences In Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Tolerability

Hypertension ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Khaddage ◽  
Julie Patterson ◽  
Dave L Dixon

Background: Recent guidelines endorse the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for out-of-office BP measurement and HTN management. Past literature has described patient perceptions of ABPM tolerability but differences between sex and age have not previously been determined. The objective of this study was to evaluate sex and age differences in such patient perceptions. Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm trial (NCT03920956) of a community pharmacy-driven ABPM service that enrolled 52 patients at least 18 years of age who were suspected of having white coat, masked, or sustained HTN, have symptoms of hypotension, or require confirmation of an initial diagnosis of HTN. We evaluated the tolerability of the ABPM device (Oscar 2; SunTech Medical, Morrisville, NC) as a secondary outcome with a previously published 8-question survey using a 0-10 scale (0=not at all, 5=somewhat, 10=extremely). The responses were dichotomized as either favorable (0-4) or unfavorable (5-10) with reverse coding for positively-worded questions. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square analyses were used to describe sex and age differences. Results: A total of 50 surveys (96%) were completed and returned. Respondents were 50% female (n=25) with a mean (SD) age of 57.5 (15.8), and 58% (n=29) were at least 55 years of age. Female respondents were more likely to find the monitor cumbersome to wear at times other than at home, work, or driving (16/21, 76.2% vs. 10/25, 40%, p = 0.014). Although nonsignificant, male respondents were more likely to find the monitor embarrassing to wear (7/25, 28.0% vs. 2/24, 8.3%, p = 0.076). In comparisons of tolerability by age, subjects less than 55 years of age were more likely to report being disturbed by the pump during driving (8/21, 38.1% vs. 1/24, 4.2%, p = 0.005), at other times (7/20, 35.0% vs. 2/24, 8.3%, p = 0.029), and found the monitor embarrassing to wear (7/21, 33.3% vs. 2/28, 7.1%, p = 0.019). Conclusions: Previous studies suggest that ABPM is generally well-tolerated by patients but may cause some discomfort or disturbed sleep. Differences in tolerability appear to become more evident across age groups and sex. These data suggest select patients may require additional counseling and education to ensure adherence to ABPM.

Author(s):  
Sarah J Khaddage ◽  
Julie A Patterson ◽  
Lana J Sargent ◽  
Elvin T Price ◽  
Dave L Dixon

Abstract Background Clinical Practice Guidelines endorse using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for the diagnosis and management of hypertension (HTN). However, ABPM is not always tolerated by patients, and differences between individuals according to age and sex remain unexplored. Methods This is a post-hoc analysis of a prospective, single-arm clinical trial (NCT03920956) that evaluated the feasibility of an ABPM service provided at two community pharmacies. Tolerability was assessed using a previously published survey, which included seven yes/no questions and eight answered on a scale of 0-10. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square analyses were used to summarize the data for the patient surveys and to describe sex and age differences in device tolerability. Results Of the 52 subjects enrolled, 50 (96%) completed the survey; half were female with a mean (SD) age of 57.5 years (15.8). Chi-square analyses showed that compared to their male counterparts, females were more likely to find the monitor cumbersome to wear (76.2% vs. 40%, p = 0.014). Subjects under 55 years of age were more likely to be disturbed by the noise of the monitor during driving (38.1% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.005) and at other times (35.0% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.029), and to find the monitor embarrassing to wear (33.3% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.019). Conclusions Although ABPM was generally well-tolerated overall, we did identify age and sex differences in tolerability. These factors should be considered to ensure patient acceptance and tolerability of ABPM.


Author(s):  
V. S. Pasko

The aim of the study was to determine peculiarities of 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring indices of patients with essential hypertension, stage II of different age groups. Material and methods. Indices of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were identified in 57 middle-aged patients (45-59 years) (group I) and 43 elderly patients (60-74 years) (group II), who underwent two-week in-patient treatment. The control group consisted of 15 patients for every of the surveyed categories (group III - middle-aged and group IV – elderly respectively) matched with basic by age and gender. Results. We have shown that one of the factors that determines the change in hemodynamics in patients with essential hypertension is age, with the age patients experience the decrease in diastolic blood pressure with steadily increased systolic blood pressure, that should be considered in the prescription of antihypertensive treatment. With age, a gradual increase in systolic blood pressure is associated with the increased aortic stiffness, partially with the increase in collagen and the decrease in elastic fibrils and the formation of isolated systolic hypertension. Thus, it is proved that in the formation of isolated hypertension the growth of pulse blood pressure for more than 60 mm Hg is unfavorable in a development of cerebrovascular events. Pulse arterial blood pressure was stronger risk factor than systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure or average arterial pressure in the elderly. Recently, taking into account age characteristics, all three indices were recognized as comparable predictors at the age of 50-59 years as the transitional period, and at the age of 60-79 years diastolic blood pressure adversely affecting the cardiovascular risk, increased pulse blood pressure prognostically above the level of systolic arterial pressure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer S. Ringrose ◽  
Raj Bapuji ◽  
Wade Coutinho ◽  
Omar Mouhammed ◽  
Lindsay Bridgland ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Javier Vilchez-Lopez ◽  
Isabel Mateo-Gavira ◽  
Florentino Carral-San Laureano ◽  
Maria Victoria Garcia-Palacios ◽  
Jose Ortego-Rojo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 111 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramón C. Hermida ◽  
Artemio Mojón ◽  
José R. Fernández ◽  
Alfonso Otero ◽  
Juan J. Crespo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document