scholarly journals Risk‐Adjusted Comparison of In‐Hospital Outcomes of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Author(s):  
Peter Stachon ◽  
Klaus Kaier ◽  
Andreas Zirlik ◽  
Wolfgang Bothe ◽  
Timo Heidt ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Wu ◽  
Chenguang Li ◽  
Yang Zheng ◽  
Qian Tong ◽  
Quan Liu ◽  
...  

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the temporal trends of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and to compare the in-hospital outcomes between TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with AF.Background: Data comparing TAVR to SAVR in severe AS patients with AF are lacking.Methods: National inpatient sample database in the United States from 2012 to 2016 were queried to identify hospitalizations for severe aortic stenosis patients with AF who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to compare in-hospital outcomes for TAVR vs. SAVR for AS patients with AF.Results: The analysis included 278,455 hospitalizations, of which 124,910 (44.9%) were comorbid with AF. Before matching, TAVR had higher in-hospital mortality than SAVR (3.1 vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001); however, there was a declining trend during the study period (Ptrend < 0.001). After matching, TAVR and SAVR had similar in-hospital mortality (2.9 vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001) and stroke. TAVR was associated with lower rates of acute kidney injury, new dialysis, cardiac complications, acquired pneumonia, sepsis, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, non-routine discharge, and shorter length of stay; however, TAVR was associated with more pacemaker implantation and higher cost. Of the patients receiving TAVR, the presence of AF was associated with an increased rate of complications and increased medical resource usage compared to those without AF.Conclusions: In-hospital mortality and stroke for TAVR and SAVR in AF, AS are similar; however, the in-hospital mortality in TAVR AF is declining and associated with more favorable in-hospital outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-199
Author(s):  
Raúl A. Borracci ◽  
Miguel Rubio ◽  
Julio Baldi ◽  
Rodolfo A. Ahuad Guerrero ◽  
Víctor Mauro ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelani Grant ◽  
Bertrand Ebner ◽  
Louis Vincent ◽  
Jennifer Maning ◽  
neal olarte ◽  
...  

Introduction: A history of malignancy is incorporated in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Score to assess presurgical risk in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), however data on the prognostic importance in those undergoing TAVR remains limited. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample Database was queried from 2012 to 2017 to identify patients who underwent TAVR using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 and 10 procedure codes. These patients were classified into those who had a history of malignancy or not using ICD 9 and 10 diagnostic codes. Results: There were 24,615 patients who underwent TAVR, of these 4,735 patients had a prior history of malignancy whereas 19,880 patients had no prior history of malignancy. Patients with a history of malignancy were older than those without (81.1±7.9 vs. 80.1± 6.7 years old, p<0.001). Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Patients with a history of malignancy had similar rates of post-TAVR pacemaker implantation (7.6% vs. 6.8%,p=0.05), deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (2.8% vs.3.1%, p=0.231), paravalvular leak (0.9% vs. 1.1%, p=0.312) and cardiogenic shock (0.3% vs. 0.3%, p=0.828) as those without. The occurrence of post TAVR ischemic strokes were higher in those without a history of malignancy ( 4.8% vs. 3.6%, p<0.001). Using a multivariate logistic regression model to adjust for confounding factors such as age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease and coronary artery disease, a history of malignancy was predictive of decreased odds of death in patients undergoing TAVR (odds ratio: 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.90, p=0.007). Conclusions: In patients with severe symptomatic AS and a history of malignancy, TAVR appears safe with comparable in-hospital outcomes. A history of malignancy should not preclude TAVR in patients with severe symptomatic AS, however larger studies are needed to confirm this finding.


Author(s):  
Siyuan P. Sheng ◽  
Paula D. Strassle ◽  
Sameer Arora ◽  
Dhaval Kolte ◽  
Cassandra J. Ramm ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document