scholarly journals Antegrade Blood Flow on 4‐Dimensional Computed Tomography Angiography Predict Stroke Subtype in Patients With Acute Large Artery Occlusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meixia Zhang ◽  
Zhicai Chen ◽  
Jinjin Xu ◽  
Xiaoxian Gong ◽  
Feina Shi ◽  
...  

Background The purpose of this study was to determine whether the presence of antegrade blood flow was related to stroke subtype in patients with acute intracranial large artery occlusion. Methods and Results The prospectively collected data for consecutive patients who had occlusion of the unilateral M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery with or without internal carotid artery and received reperfusion therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Stroke causes were determined according to the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment standard. We defined antegrade flow as early opacification at the distal interface of the clot with subsequent distal extension on 4‐dimensional computed tomography angiography. A total of 387 large artery occlusion patients were analyzed (229 men and 158 women; mean age, 71±14 years), including 77 (19.9%) with large artery atherosclerosis ( LAA ), 206 (53.2%) with cardioembolism, and 104 (26.9%) with undetermined causes. Antegrade flow was found in 206 (53.2%) patients, and 181 (46.8%) presented with retrograde flow. The rate of antegrade flow was much higher in patients with LAA than in those with cardioembolism (85.7% versus 42.2%, P <0.001). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that presence of antegrade flow was significantly associated with cuse of LAA after adjusting for confounding factors, when setting cardioembolism as reference (odds ratio, 5.650; 95% confidence interval, 2.451–13.158; P <0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the antegrade flow for predicting LAA were 43.1%, 91.5%, 85.7%, and 57.8%, respectively. Conclusions Using 4‐dimensional computed tomography angiography, antegrade flow can be identified in more than half of acute anterior large artery occlusion patients and occurs more frequently in those with LAA as the cause of stroke.

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 261-266
Author(s):  
J.A. Matías-Guiu ◽  
C. Serna-Candel ◽  
J.M. Espejo-Domínguez ◽  
M. Fernández-Matarrubia ◽  
P. Simal ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Katsnelson ◽  
Tatjana Rundek ◽  
Ralph Sacco ◽  
Hannah Gardener ◽  
Shaneela Malik ◽  
...  

Objectives: Identification of gene variants of stroke subtypes is important for the development of tailored ischemic stroke therapies among various ethnic groups. Valid and reliable determination of ischemic stroke subtype is essential for achieving this goal and to standardize a classification scheme across multi-center studies and different populations. Causative Classification System for Ischemic Stroke (CCS) is a novel computerized subclassification tool developed to improve reliability and accuracy of classifying stroke types. The CCS algorithm relies on both phenotypic and causative stroke variables. A Hispanic subset of the SiGN, an important and distinct target population with greater risk of certain stroke subtypes, was evaluated with Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) and CCS and the agreement between the two classification systems was analyzed. Methods: Over 6000 subjects at 15 sites across US and Europe were enrolled, with TOAST and CCS locally adjudicated. Blood collection and central data quality control (10% central readjudication) were performed on all participants. A subset of Hispanics was analyzed for the purpose of this study and the agreement between the TOAST and CCS were assessed by kappa statistic. Findings: Hispanics (n=595, 10.9%) compared to non-Hispanics (n=5457) were more likely to be younger (63.7 vs. 64.0), male (55% vs. 46%) and have fewer of the traditional stroke risk factors HTN (54% vs. 64%), Afib (11% vs. 14%), DM(23% vs. 25%), CAD(16% vs. 20%) and smoking(19% vs. 22%). While the TOAST showed no differences between stroke subtypes for Hispanic vs. non-Hispanics, in CCS, Hispanics were classified with more of large vessel (22% vs. 20%), cardioembolic (37% vs. 30%) and small vessel strokes (13% vs. 9%) and fewer with undetermined etiology (28% vs. 40%) as compared to non-Hispanics. TOAST and CCS offered moderate correlation across all stroke types in Hispanics: kappa of 0.66 for large artery atherosclerosis, 0.58 for cardioembolic, and 0.58 for small artery occlusion. Conclusion: CCS offers a more sensitive and accurate system for subphenotyping of strokes in Hispanics who tended to have relatively fewer risk factors and unclassified strokes. Further studies correlating the two classification systems and their relation to genotyping data are warranted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-387
Author(s):  
Johanna M. Ospel ◽  
Ondrej Volny ◽  
Wu Qiu ◽  
Mohamed Najm ◽  
Moiz Hafeez ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose Various imaging paradigms are used for endovascular treatment (EVT) decision-making and outcome estimation in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We aim to compare how these imaging paradigms perform for EVT patient selection and outcome estimation. Methods Prospective multi-center cohort study of patients with AIS symptoms with multi-phase computed tomography angiography (mCTA) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) baseline imaging. mCTA-based EVT-eligibility was defined as presence of large vessel occlusion (LVO) and moderate-to-good collaterals on mCTA. CTP-based eligibility was defined as presence of LVO, ischemic core (defined on relative cerebral blood flow, absolute cerebral blood flow, and cerebral blood volume maps) <70 mL, mismatch-ratio >1.8, absolute mismatch >15 mL. EVT-eligibility and adjusted rates of good outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0–2) based on these imaging paradigms were compared.Results Of 289/464 patients with LVO, 263 (91%) were EVT-eligible by mCTA-criteria versus 63 (22%), 19 (7%) and 103 (36%) by rCBF, aCBF, and CBV-CTP-criteria. CTP and mCTA-criteria were discordant in 40% to 53%. Estimated outcomes were best in patients who met both mCTA and CTP eligibility-criteria and were treated with EVT (62% to 87% good outcome). Patients eligible for EVT by mCTA-criteria and not by CTP-criteria receiving EVT achieved good outcome rates of 53% to 57%. Few patients met CTP-criteria and not mCTA-criteria for EVT.Conclusions Simpler imaging selection criteria that rely on little else than detection of the occluded blood vessel may be more sensitive and less specific, thus resulting in more patients being offered EVT and arguably benefiting from it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document