Abstract TP349: Advanced Practice Registered Nurses Provide Cost-effective, Quality Stroke Care

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda Jones ◽  
Katherine Taylor ◽  
Joyce Dorssom
Keyword(s):  
Registered Nurses ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Stroke Population ◽  
Stroke Team ◽  
Physical Form ◽  
Advanced Practice Registered Nurses ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
Evidenced Based

Background: Our institution is a nationally known stroke center. The number of stroke patients treated yearly grew from 235 in 2000 to 917 in 2011. We are challenged to provide clinically excellent, ground breaking care in a fiscally responsible manner to this growing population. Purpose: To meet this challenge our institution utilizes Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) to improve and streamline stroke care. Methods: An APRN was part of the stroke team at the inception and continues as Coordinator. In 2008 the team implemented an additional APRN role to provide acute inpatient care to stroke and general Neurology patients. There are now 3 Board Certified APRNs who meet Certified Stroke Center requirements and fill this role. Their backgrounds are Emergency Medicine, Intensive Care, and Internal Medicine, and they are Certified Neurology Registered Nurses. They work collaboratively with the Neurologists in 12 hour shifts, 7 days a week. The APRNs complete History and Physicals, participate in research, provide education, assist with acute strokes and perform patient rounds.They address patient and staff concerns, and maintain collaborative care with other disciplines. Results: APRN collaboration assures continuous patient monitoring and allows physicians to address more acute issues. The Interval Summary dictation improves accurate coding of patient visits, assists in documenting core stroke measures, and provides current follow up to referring facilities. The APRNs designed and utilize a Neuroscience History and Physical form, which provides uniform and streamlined documentation. Their productivity logs show during June of 2012, a completion of 139 new consults, 169 routine follow ups, and monitoring of 97 ICU patients. This is in addition to dictation and multiple workplace demands. The Neurologists requested additional APRN coverage and are favorable of collaborative practice. Conclusion: In conclusion, the organized, streamlined, evidenced- based APRN care results in cost effectiveness meeting the challenges of the growing stroke population. Future plans for the APRN role include continued efficient care, educational efforts, preceptors for APRN students and residents, and participation in the hospital APRN Council.

In-Hospital Stroke Care: A Six-Year Community-Based Primary Stroke Center Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 194187442110070
Author(s):  
Felix Ejike Chukwudelunzu ◽  
Bart M Demaerschalk ◽  
Leonardo Fugoso ◽  
Emeka Amadi ◽  
Donn Dexter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Stroke Team ◽  
Primary Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background and purpose: In-hospital stroke-onset assessment and management present numerous challenges, especially in community hospitals. Comprehensive analysis of key stroke care metrics in community-based primary stroke centers is under-studied. Methods: Medical records were reviewed for patients admitted to a community hospital for non-cerebrovascular indications and for whom a stroke alert was activated between 2013 and 2019. Demographic, clinical, radiologic and laboratory information were collected for each incident stroke. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed. When applicable, Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-Square tests were used to compare median values and categorical data between pre-specified groups. Statistical significance was set at alpha = 0.05. Results: There were 192 patients with in-hospital stroke-alert activation; mean age (SD) was 71.0 years (15.0), 49.5% female. 51.6% (99/192) had in-hospital ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. The most frequent mechanism of stroke was cardioembolism. Upon stroke activation, 45.8% had ischemic stroke while 40.1% had stroke mimics. Stroke team response time from activation was 26 minutes for all in-hospital activations. Intravenous thrombolysis was utilized in 8% of those with ischemic stroke; 3.4% were transferred for consideration of endovascular thrombectomy. In-hospital mortality was 17.7%, and the proportion of patients discharged to home was 34.4% for all activations. Conclusion: The in-hospital stroke mortality was high, and the proportions of patients who either received or were considered for acute intervention were low. Quality improvement targeting increased use of acute stroke intervention in eligible patients and reducing hospital mortality in this patient cohort is needed.

Abstract WP363: Journey of a Five-Hospital System to Primary Stroke Center Certification

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deb Motz ◽  
Dicky Huey ◽  
Tracy Moore ◽  
Byron Freemyer ◽  
Tommye Austin
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Support ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Hospital System ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Primary Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
Evidenced Based

Background: In 2008, a city with a population of over one million people had no organized stroke care or Certified Primary Stroke Centers. Patients presenting with stroke symptoms had inconsistent neurology coverage and little or no access to rtPA. The purpose is to describe steps taken for five acute-care hospitals (with one CMS provider number) to become Primary Stroke Certified. Methods: The journey began with administrative support and a commitment to provide the resources for a successful program. To oversee development, a Medical Director and Stroke Coordinator were appointed. To bridge the gap in available specialty physicians, partnerships were formed with a telemedicine group to provide emergency treatment and an academic medical center to augment the neurology and neuro-surgical coverage. Multidisciplinary teams met monthly in each facility. Representatives from each team formed a regional committee and an education council was created to share best practices and assure consistency across the system. Evidenced based order sets were developed using clinical practice guidelines. The Medical Executive Committee at each facility and ultimately the Medical Executive Board endorsed the order sets and mandated their use. Each facility chose the appropriate unit to cohort the stroke patients which encouraged expertise in care. Results: This journey resulted in a high functioning system of care. Baptist Health System became Joint Commission Certified in all five locations (May 2009). We were awarded the Get with the Guidelines Bronze Award (September 2010), the Silver Plus Award (July 2011) and the Gold Plus Award (July 2012). In addition, we were the first in Texas to achieve the Target Stroke Honor Roll (Q3 2011) and have maintained this status for eight consecutive quarters. Conclusion: In conclusion, administrative support is imperative to the success of a stroke program. Leadership, partnerships, committees, councils and staff involvement from the start drove the team to a successful certification process with outstanding outcomes. The stroke committees continue to meet monthly to analyze performance measures, identify opportunities for improvement and execute action plans.

Abstract WP439: "You Gotta Troll to Enroll!" Nurses Actively Scouting Patients for Clinical Trials

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty Robertson ◽  
Denise Levesque ◽  
Nicole Wolber ◽  
Nili Steiner ◽  
Nancy Nunez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Training Session ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Patient Identification ◽  
Stroke Team ◽  
Expert Nurses ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
Patient Enrollment

Problem/ Background: Evidence- based practice is the cornerstone in delivery of stroke care to optimize outcomes for patients. Research is the foundation to build and advance clinical practice. As a Comprehensive Stroke Center, we are charged with participating in IRB approved research. In 2016 the SUCCEED trial was stopped here as a result of low enrollment. The stroke nurses were not directly involved in that trial. In 2017, the stroke nurses partnered with our physicians and began the ARAMIS trial. This is a multicenter study of acute stroke patients taking anticoagulation therapy prior to admission and suffering a stroke. We recognized the need for our stroke nurses to collaborate, participate and use their expertise in identifying appropriate research patients for this study. Quality Question: Will tasking Stroke Nurses with identifying patients improve the enrollment of patients in ARAMIS trial? Methods: Stroke nurses attended an ARAMIS training session for physicians. Included in the meeting was review of inclusion/exclusion criteria for patient enrollment. A group e-mail was created for all participating in the study to help identify potential patients. When a patient was discovered an email was sent to the group alerting those responsible for obtaining consent for the study and data collection for the registry. Results: After one trial was ended due to low enrollment, the new ARAMIS trial opened. The stroke team nurses took the lead on identifying patients. Reviewing retrospective data starting in November 2017 until March 2019, 56 patients were enrolled in Aramis. Stroke nurses identified 43 patients (77%), Neurology fellows 10 (18%) and Faculty physicians 3 (5%). Conclusion: When including expert nurses in the patient identification process, the nurse plays a pivotal role in identifying appropriate patient for the MDs to enroll, thus, increasing enrollment in clinical trials. While additional tracking and trending needs to take place as new trails open, this trial makes clear the need for nurse involvement in identifying appropriate patients.

Abstract WP281: Pharmacists Improve Door to Needle Times in the Emergency Department

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Phan ◽  
Megan Degener
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Safe Delivery ◽  
Team Meetings ◽  
Stroke Team ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
The Impact

Background: An estimated two million brain cells die every minute cerebral perfusion is impaired. The best outcomes for acute ischemic strokes are achieved by decreasing the time from emergency department (ED) arrival to thrombolytic therapy. Alteplase, a high risk medication, was dosed and prepared in the pharmacy. This contributed to prolonged door to needle (DTN) times. Purpose: To describe the impact of pharmacist interventions on DTN times in the ED. Methods: All patients who received alteplase for acute ischemic stroke from January 2012 to April 2019 were reviewed. In November 2012, the ED pharmacy program began with a dedicated ED pharmacist for 8 hours a day and expanded to 13 hours a day in September 2014. During those hours alteplase was prepared at bedside in the ED. In November 2015, all pharmacists were trained on the ED code stroke process. Monthly case reviews and DTN times were reported to the stroke coordinators starting January 2017. Alteplase preparation and administration in the computed tomography (CT) room started April 2017. Following comprehensive stroke center certification, routine stroke competency exams were administered to pharmacists in 2018. In 2019, pharmacists started reporting DTN times at neuroscience core team meetings. Results: During this time frame, a total of 407 patients received alteplase. Average DTN times decreased from a baseline of 130.9 minutes to 45.3 minutes. Interventions that resulted in the largest decrease in average DTN times were the expanded ED service hours (34.6 minutes) and pharmacist preparation of alteplase in the CT room (21.9 minutes). Conclusions: Pharmacists directly impacted stroke care in the ED by decreasing DTN times. Presence of a pharmacist in the ED enabled fast and safe delivery of alteplase by ensuring accurate dosing and preparation. Pharmacists also performed rapid medication reconciliation and expedited antihypertensive therapies. In conclusion, having pharmacists as part of the stroke team is a model that could be adopted by hospitals to enhance stroke care.

Abstract TP289: Code Neuro-Intervention a New Necessity: Reality of Shifting Stroke Care Paradigm

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Suhan ◽  
Spozhmy Panezai ◽  
Jaskiran Brar ◽  
Audrey Z Arango ◽  
Anna Pullicino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Care ◽  
Work Hours ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Angiography Suite ◽  
Stroke Team ◽  
Cross Training ◽  
Code Process ◽  
Time Parameters ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background: Various strategies have been implemented to reduce acute stroke treatment times. A unique code process pathway was designed at our hospital specifically to be activated by the stroke team for the purpose of rapidly assembling the Neurointerventional team. Methods: Code Neurointervention (NI), was designed and tested from January 2014 to April 2014 for all the patients who presented with ischemic strokes to our community based, university affiliated comprehensive stroke center. We retrospectively analyzed all patients who had Code NI called from May 1, 2014 to April 30, 2015 and compared them to patients who underwent acute endovascular treatment the prior year (Non Code NI). The following parameters were compared: decision to recanalization and door to recanalization times. Further analysis was done to compare patients presenting during business hours (Monday-Friday 8am-5pm) and off hours using GraphPad QuickCalcs Web site. Results: There were 28 Code NI; 14 were called during work hours and 14 during off hours. The previous year 25 patients underwent acute endovascular intervention; 12 during work hours and 13 during off hours. Mean decision to recanalization time was 106 (Code NI) vs 115 minutes (Non Code NI) (p<0.0.6) during work hours and 154 (Code NI) vs 139 minutes (Non Code NI) (p<0.37) during off hours. Mean door to recanalization time was 169 (Code NI) vs 173 minutes (Non Code NI) (p<0.85) during work hours and 252 (Code NI) vs 243minutes (Non Code NI) (p< 0.75) during off hours. Subset analysis of time parameters for patients in Code NI group showed mean decision to recanalization times of 106 minutes during work hours vs 154 minutes off work hours (p<0.004). Mean door to recanalization times were 169 minutes vs 251 minutes (p<0.0003), respectively. Conclusion: Institution of Code NI significantly improved intervention time parameters during work hours as compared to off hours. Rapid assembly of the neurointervention team, rapid availability of imaging and angiography suite likely contribute to these differences. Further initiatives, such as improving neurointervention staff availability during off hours or cross training other staff can further improve acute intervention time parameters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document