Abstract WP83: Validation of a Relative Non-Contrast CT Map to Detect Early Ischemic Changes in Acute Stroke
Background: Discerning signs of early infarct on the non-contrast CT (NCCT) can be difficult. To facilitate interpretation of the NCCT we previously developed a technique to generate symmetry ratio maps of the NCCT (rNCCT maps) on which subtle (≥5%) differences in density between symmetric brain regions are enhanced. We sought to validate the rNCCT map against other measures of early infarction in a large cohort. Methods: rNCCT maps were generated for 146 ischemic stroke patients. We assessed how often a neurologist’s interpretation of the NCCT was changed when provided with the rNCCT map. The neurologist was blinded to CTP and DWI but was given the infarct hemisphere. In addition, using the 24-hour DWI as the gold standard, we assessed the sensitivity, specificity and volumetric accuracy of the rNCCT-defined infarct core and compared this to the test characteristics of CTP-defined infarct core (CBF<38% threshold). Results: Addition of rNCCT overlay map changed clinician’s initial read 64.4% of the time (95% CI 56-72%); the rNCCT identified new areas of ischemia not appreciated on blinded review 86.2% of the time (95% CI 78-92%) and in 35.1% helped rule out early ischemia where the reader was unsure of its presence (95% CI 26-45%). In the 53 patients with reperfusion and follow-up MRI, specificity of rNCCT for final lesion volume was 99.5% for rNCCT [98.5-99.8%] vs. 99.8% [IQR 98.8-99.9%] for CTP (P=0.08). Sensitivity for rNCCT was 19.9% [7.1-28.1%] vs. 17.5% [4.7-32.2%] for CTP (P=0.56). Conclusions: This study validates the rNCCT map for detection of early ischemic changes. It is more quantitative and objective than a clinician’s read of the NCCT alone. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting early ischemic changes on rNCCT were comparable to those achieved with CTP. This indicates that the rNCCT could be a valuable tool in the evaluation of acute stroke patients.