scholarly journals TMS to the Lateral Occipital Cortex Disrupts Object Processing but Facilitates Scene Processing

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 4174-4184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin R. Mullin ◽  
Jennifer K. E. Steeves
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Scene Perception ◽  
Visual Image ◽  
Object Perception ◽  
Occipital Cortex ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Object Processing ◽  
Repetitive Tms ◽  
Scene Processing ◽  
Lateral Occipital Cortex

The study of brain-damaged patients and advancements in neuroimaging have lead to the discovery of discrete brain regions that process visual image categories, such as objects and scenes. However, how these visual image categories interact remains unclear. For example, is scene perception simply an extension of object perception, or can global scene “gist” be processed independently of its component objects? Specifically, when recognizing a scene such as an “office,” does one need to first recognize its individual objects, such as the desk, chair, lamp, pens, and paper to build up the representation of an “office” scene? Here, we show that temporary interruption of object processing through repetitive TMS to the left lateral occipital cortex (LO), an area known to selectively process objects, impairs object categorization but surprisingly facilitates scene categorization. This result was replicated in a second experiment, which assessed the temporal dynamics of this disruption and facilitation. We further showed that repetitive TMS to left LO significantly disrupted object processing but facilitated scene processing when stimulation was administered during the first 180 msec of the task. This demonstrates that the visual system retains the ability to process scenes during disruption to object processing. Moreover, the facilitation of scene processing indicates disinhibition of areas involved in global scene processing, likely caused by disrupting inhibitory contributions from the LO. These findings indicate separate but interactive pathways for object and scene processing and further reveal a network of inhibitory connections between these visual brain regions.

scholarly journals Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Transverse Occipital Sulcus Affects Scene but Not Object Processing

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 961-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Ganaden ◽  
Caitlin R. Mullin ◽  
Jennifer K. E. Steeves
Keyword(s):  
Scene Perception ◽  
Occipital Cortex ◽  
Control Site ◽  
Image Features ◽  
Retrosplenial Cortex ◽  
Scene Recognition ◽  
Scene Categorization ◽  
Object Processing ◽  
Inhibitory Mechanisms ◽  
Scene Processing

Traditionally, it has been theorized that the human visual system identifies and classifies scenes in an object-centered approach, such that scene recognition can only occur once key objects within a scene are identified. Recent research points toward an alternative approach, suggesting that the global image features of a scene are sufficient for the recognition and categorization of a scene. We have previously shown that disrupting object processing with repetitive TMS to object-selective cortex enhances scene processing possibly through a release of inhibitory mechanisms between object and scene pathways [Mullin, C. R., & Steeves, J. K. E. TMS to the lateral occipital cortex disrupts object processing but facilitates scene processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 4174–4184, 2011]. Here we show the effects of TMS to the transverse occipital sulcus (TOS), an area implicated in scene perception, on scene and object processing. TMS was delivered to the TOS or the vertex (control site) while participants performed an object and scene natural/nonnatural categorization task. Transiently interrupting the TOS resulted in significantly lower accuracies for scene categorization compared with control conditions. This demonstrates a causal role of the TOS in scene processing and indicates its importance, in addition to the parahippocampal place area and retrosplenial cortex, in the scene processing network. Unlike TMS to object-selective cortex, which facilitates scene categorization, disrupting scene processing through stimulation of the TOS did not affect object categorization. Further analysis revealed a higher proportion of errors for nonnatural scenes that led us to speculate that the TOS may be involved in processing the higher spatial frequency content of a scene. This supports a nonhierarchical model of scene recognition.

scholarly journals Hippocampal Engagement during Recall Depends on Memory Content

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Ross ◽  
Patrick Sadil ◽  
D. Merika Wilson ◽  
Rosemary A. Cowell
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Effective Connectivity ◽  
Occipital Cortex ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Object Processing ◽  
Parahippocampal Cortex ◽  
Image Patches ◽  
Memory Content ◽  
Associative Recall ◽  
Lateral Occipital Cortex

SummaryThe hippocampus is considered pivotal to recall, allowing retrieval of information not available in the immediate environment. In contrast, neocortex is thought to signal familiarity, and to contribute to recall only when called upon by the hippocampus. However, this view is not compatible with representational accounts of memory, which reject the mapping of cognitive processes onto brain regions. According to representational accounts, the hippocampus is not engaged by recall per se, rather it is engaged whenever hippocampal representations are required. To test whether hippocampus is engaged by recall when hippocampal representations are not required, we used functional imaging and a non-associative recall task, with images (objects, scenes) studied in isolation, and image-patches used as cues. As predicted by a representational account, hippocampal activation increased during recall of scenes – which are known to be processed by hippocampus – but not during recall of objects. Object recall instead engaged neocortical regions known to be involved in object-processing. Further supporting the representational account, effective connectivity analyses revealed that recall was associated with increased information flow out of lateral occipital cortex (object recall) and parahippocampal cortex (scene recall), suggesting that recall-related activation spread from neocortex to hippocampus, not the reverse.

scholarly journals Neural correlates of perceiving and interpreting engraved prehistoric patterns as human production: effect of archaeological expertise.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Salagnon ◽  
Sandrine Cremona ◽  
Marc Joliot ◽  
Francesco d'Errico ◽  
Emmanuel Mellet
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Visual Analysis ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Occipital Cortex ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Salience Network ◽  
Natural Processes ◽  
And Control ◽  
Lateral Occipital Cortex

It has been suggested that engraved abstract patterns dating from the Middle and Lower Palaeolithic served as means of representation and communication. Identifying the brain regions involved in visual processing of these engravings can provide insights into their function. In this study, brain activity was measured during perception of the earliest known Palaeolithic engraved patterns and compared to natural patterns mimicking human-made engravings. Participants were asked to categorise marks as being intentionally made by humans or due to natural processes (e.g. erosion, root etching). To simulate the putative familiarity of our ancestors with the marks, the responses of expert archaeologists and control participants were compared, allowing characterisation of the effect of previous knowledge on both behaviour and brain activity in perception of the marks. Besides a set of regions common to both groups and involved in visual analysis and decision-making, the experts exhibited greater activity in the inferior part of the lateral occipital cortex, ventral occipitotemporal cortex, and medial thalamic regions. These results are consistent with those reported in visual expertise studies, and confirm the importance of the integrative visual areas in the perception of the earliest abstract engravings. The attribution of a natural rather than human origin to the marks elicited greater activity in the salience network in both groups, reflecting the uncertainty and ambiguity in the perception of, and decision-making for, natural patterns. The activation of the salience network might also be related to the process at work in the attribution of an intention to the marks. The primary visual area was not specifically involved in the visual processing of engravings, which argued against its central role in the emergence of engraving production.

scholarly journals Theta-burst TMS of lateral occipital cortex reduces BOLD responses across category-selective areas in ventral temporal cortex

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris I A Groen ◽  
Edward H Silson ◽  
David Pitcher ◽  
Chris I Baker
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Cortex ◽  
Occipital Cortex ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Stimulus Category ◽  
Cortical Region ◽  
Face Area ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Ventral Temporal Cortex ◽  
Theta Burst ◽  
Lateral Occipital Cortex

AbstractHuman visual cortex contains three scene-selective regions in the lateral, medial and ventral cortex, termed the occipital place area (OPA), medial place area (MPA) and parahippocampal place area (PPA). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), all three regions respond more strongly when viewing visual scenes compared with isolated objects or faces. To determine how these regions are functionally and causally connected, we applied transcranial magnetic stimulation to OPA and measured fMRI responses before and after stimulation, using a theta-burst paradigm (TBS). To test for stimulus category-selectivity, we presented a range of visual categories (scenes, buildings, objects, faces). To test for specificity of any effects to TBS of OPA we employed two control conditions: Sham, with no TBS stimulation, and an active TBS-control with TBS to a proximal face-selective cortical region (occipital face area, or OFA). We predicted that TBS to OPA (but not OFA) would lead to decreased responses to scenes and buildings (but not other categories) in other scene-selective cortical regions. Across both ROI and whole-volume analyses, we observed decreased responses to scenes in PPA as a result of TBS. However, these effects were neither category specific, with decreased responses to all stimulus categories, nor limited to scene-selective regions, with decreases also observed in face-selective fusiform face area (FFA). Furthermore, similar effects were observed with TBS to OFA, thus effects were not specific to the stimulation site in the lateral occipital cortex. Whilst these data are suggestive of a causal, but non-specific relationship between lateral occipital and ventral temporal cortex, we discuss several factors that could have underpinned this result, such as the differences between TBS and online TMS, the role of anatomical distance between stimulated regions and how TMS effects are operationalised. Furthermore, our findings highlight the importance of active control conditions in brain stimulation experiments to accurately assess functional and causal connectivity between specific brain regions.

scholarly journals Temporo-parietal brain regions are involved in higher order object perception

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia Nestmann ◽  
Daniel Wiesen ◽  
Hans-Otto Karnath ◽  
Johannes Rennig
Keyword(s):  
Object Perception ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Shape Perception ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Complex Object ◽  
List Type ◽  
Brain Areas ◽  
Visual Stream ◽  
Object Processing ◽  
Global Shape

AbstractLesions to posterior temporo-parietal brain regions are associated with deficits in perception of global, hierarchical shapes, but also impairments in the processing of objects presented under demanding viewing conditions. Evidence from neuroimaging studies and lesion patterns observed in patients with simultanagnosia and agnosia for object orientation suggest similar brain regions to be involved in perception of global shapes and processing of objects in atypical (‘non-canonical’) orientation. In a localizer experiment, we identified individual temporoparietal brain areas involved in global shape perception and found significantly higher BOLD signals during the processing of non-canonical compared to canonical objects. In a multivariate approach, we demonstrated that posterior temporo-parietal brain areas show distinct voxel patterns for non-canonical and canonical objects and that voxel patterns of global shapes are more similar to those of objects in non-canonical compared to canonical viewing conditions. These results suggest that temporo-parietal brain areas are not only involved in global shape perception but might serve a more general mechanism of complex object perception. Our results challenge a strict attribution of object processing to the ventral visual stream by suggesting specific dorsal contributions in more demanding viewing conditions.HighlightsPosterior temporo-parietal brain areas in the TPJ region that are involved in global shape perception are significantly involved in object perceptionIndividual global shape TPJ ROIs identified with a specific localizer experiment prefer objects in non-canonical over objects in canonical orientationsUnivariate activations and multivariate voxel patterns in global shape TPJ ROIs distinguish canonical and non-canonical object presentations

An Integrated Face–Body Representation in the Fusiform Gyrus but Not the Lateral Occipital Cortex

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 2469-2478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Bernstein ◽  
Jonathan Oron ◽  
Boaz Sadeh ◽  
Galit Yovel
Keyword(s):  
Occipital Cortex ◽  
Body Representation ◽  
Simultaneous Presentation ◽  
Competitive Interactions ◽  
Competition Effect ◽  
Brain Areas ◽  
Object Processing ◽  
Distinct Category ◽  
Fmri Response ◽  
Lateral Occipital Cortex

Faces and bodies are processed by distinct category-selective brain areas. Neuroimaging studies have so far presented isolated faces and headless bodies, and therefore little is known on whether and where faces and headless bodies are grouped together to one object, as they appear in the real world. The current study examined whether a face presented above a body are represented as two separate images or as an integrated face–body representation in face and body-selective brain areas by employing a fMRI competition paradigm. This paradigm has been shown to reveal higher fMRI response to sequential than simultaneous presentation of multiple stimuli (i.e., the competition effect), indicating competitive interactions among simultaneously presented multiple stimuli. We therefore hypothesized that if a face above a body is integrated to an image of a person whereas a body above a face is represented as two separate objects, the competition effect will be larger for the latter than the former. Consistent with our hypothesis, our findings reveal a competition effect when a body is presented above a face, but not when a face is presented above a body, suggesting that a body above a face is represented as two separate objects whereas a face above a body is represented as an integrated image of a person. Interestingly, this integration of a face and a body to an image of a person was found in the fusiform, but not the lateral-occipital face and body areas. We conclude that faces and bodies are processed separately at early stages and are integrated to a unified image of a person at mid-level stages of object processing.

scholarly journals Intrinsic cortical dynamics dominate population responses to natural images across human visual cortex

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Henriksson ◽  
Seyed-Mahdi Khaligh-Razavi ◽  
Kendrick Kay ◽  
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Occipital Cortex ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Gabor Wavelet ◽  
Natural Image ◽  
Response Patterns ◽  
Cortical Dynamics ◽  
Visual Areas ◽  
Pyramid Model ◽  
Lateral Occipital Cortex

Intrinsic cortical dynamics are thought to underlie trial-to-trial variability of visually evoked responses in animal models. Understanding their function in the context of sensory processing and representation is a major current challenge. Here we report that intrinsic cortical dynamics strongly affect the representational geometry of a brain region, as reflected in response-pattern dissimilarities, and exaggerate the similarity of representations between brain regions. We characterized the representations in several human visual areas by representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs) constructed from fMRI response-patterns for natural image stimuli. The RDMs of different visual areas were highly similar when the response-patterns were estimated on the basis of the same trials (sharing intrinsic cortical dynamics), and quite distinct when patterns were estimated on the basis of separate trials (sharing only the stimulus-driven component). We show that the greater similarity of the representational geometries can be explained by the coherent fluctuations of regional-mean activation within visual cortex, reflecting intrinsic dynamics. Using separate trials to study stimulus-driven representations revealed clearer distinctions between the representational geometries: a Gabor wavelet pyramid model explained representational geometry in visual areas V1–3 and a categorical animate–inanimate model in the object-responsive lateral occipital cortex.

scholarly journals Properties of Object Processing in Lateral Occipital Cortex

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 91-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. W. Tyler ◽  
L. T. Likova ◽  
A. R. Wade
Keyword(s):  
Occipital Cortex ◽  
Object Processing ◽  
Lateral Occipital Cortex

scholarly journals Transient Perceptual Neglect: Visual Working Memory Load Affects Conscious Object Processing

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 2968-2982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Emrich ◽  
Hana Burianová ◽  
Susanne Ferber
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Object Recognition ◽  
Visual Working Memory ◽  
Memory Load ◽  
Recognition Performance ◽  
Object Perception ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Visual Object ◽  
Object Processing ◽  
Cognitive Behaviors

Visual working memory (VWM) is a capacity-limited cognitive resource that plays an important role in complex cognitive behaviors. Recent studies indicate that regions subserving VWM may play a role in the perception and recognition of visual objects, suggesting that conscious object perception may depend on the same cognitive and neural architecture that supports the maintenance of visual object information. In the present study, we examined this question by testing object processing under a concurrent VWM load. Under a high VWM load, recognition was impaired for objects presented in the left visual field, in particular when two objects were presented simultaneously. Multivariate fMRI revealed that two independent but partially overlapping networks of brain regions contribute to object recognition. The first network consisted of regions involved in VWM encoding and maintenance. Importantly, these regions were also sensitive to object load. The second network comprised regions of the ventral temporal lobes traditionally associated with object recognition. Importantly, activation in both networks predicted object recognition performance. These results indicate that information processing in regions that mediate VWM may be critical to conscious visual perception. Moreover, the observation of a hemifield asymmetry in object recognition performance has important theoretical and clinical significance for the study of visual neglect.

scholarly journals Contributions of low- and high-level properties to neural processing of visual scenes in the human brain

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1714) ◽  
pp. 20160102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris I. A. Groen ◽  
Edward H. Silson ◽  
Chris I. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Scene Perception ◽  
Visual Scene ◽  
Scene Analysis ◽  
Extrastriate Cortex ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Feature Representations ◽  
Scene Representation ◽  
Scene Processing ◽  
High Level

Visual scene analysis in humans has been characterized by the presence of regions in extrastriate cortex that are selectively responsive to scenes compared with objects or faces. While these regions have often been interpreted as representing high-level properties of scenes (e.g. category), they also exhibit substantial sensitivity to low-level (e.g. spatial frequency) and mid-level (e.g. spatial layout) properties, and it is unclear how these disparate findings can be united in a single framework. In this opinion piece, we suggest that this problem can be resolved by questioning the utility of the classical low- to high-level framework of visual perception for scene processing, and discuss why low- and mid-level properties may be particularly diagnostic for the behavioural goals specific to scene perception as compared to object recognition. In particular, we highlight the contributions of low-level vision to scene representation by reviewing (i) retinotopic biases and receptive field properties of scene-selective regions and (ii) the temporal dynamics of scene perception that demonstrate overlap of low- and mid-level feature representations with those of scene category. We discuss the relevance of these findings for scene perception and suggest a more expansive framework for visual scene analysis. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Auditory and visual scene analysis’.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document