Equal Access to Healthcare on a Non-Discriminatory Basis — Reality or Aspiration?

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mette Hartlev
Author(s):  
Daniela-Luminita Constantin ◽  
Raluca Mariana Grosu ◽  
Claudiu Herteliu ◽  
Adriana Dardala

2011 ◽  
Vol 170 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven L. Lee ◽  
Arezou Yaghoubian ◽  
Rebeca Stark ◽  
Shant Shekherdimian

2011 ◽  
Vol 165 (2) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
A. Yaghoubian ◽  
R. Stark ◽  
S. Shekherdimian ◽  
S.L. Lee

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
MORTEN EBBE JUUL NIELSEN ◽  
MARTIN MARCHMAN ANDERSEN

Abstract:It is a common belief that obesity is wholly or partially a question of personal choice and personal responsibility. It is also widely assumed that when individuals are responsible for some unfortunate state of affairs, society bears no burden to compensate them. This article focuses on two conceptualizations of responsibility: backward-looking and forward-looking conceptualizations. When ascertaining responsibility in a backward-looking sense, one has to determine how that state of affairs came into being or where the agent stood in relation to it. In contrast, a forward-looking conceptualization of responsibility puts aside questions of the past and holds a person responsible by reference to some desirable future state of affairs and will typically mean that he or she is subjected to criticism, censure, or other negative appraisals or that he or she is held cost-responsible in some form, for example, in terms of demanded compensation, loss of privileges, or similar. One example of this view is the debate as to whether the obese should be denied, wholly or partially, free and equal access to healthcare, not because they are somehow personally responsible in the backward-looking sense but simply because holding the obese responsible will have positive consequences. Taking these two conceptions of responsibility into account, the authors turn their analysis toward examining the relevant moral considerations to be taken into account when public policies regarding obesity rely on such a conception of responsibility.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Arnaldi ◽  
Mariassunta Piccinni

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18525-e18525
Author(s):  
Zhaohui Liao Arter ◽  
Daniel Desmond ◽  
Jeffrey L. Berenberg ◽  
Melissa A. Merritt

e18525 Background: Previous studies in the general population have observed that compared with Non-Hispanic White (NHW) women, Pacific Islander (PI) and Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women have higher age-adjusted mortality rates from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), while Asian Americans (AS) have lower mortality. It is unknown whether these patterns reflect biological differences, environmental exposure or perhaps access to care. Our objective was to investigate whether self-reported race/ethnicity is associated with differences in EOC survival in a Military population where patients have equal access to healthcare. Methods: The study population included women diagnosed with EOC (ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers) among US Department of Defense beneficiaries reported in the Automated Central Tumor Registry Database (year of diagnosis range: 2001-18). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models following participants from their date of diagnosis until last contact or censoring, whichever occurred first. Multivariable models were adjusted for covariates selected a priori because of their known influence on risk of EOC death; age at diagnosis (continuous), histology, stage and receipt of the first course of chemotherapy treatment. We adjusted for year of diagnosis (continuous) to account for possible changes in treatment over time. Results: The study population included 1151 patients diagnosed with EOC: 796 NHW, 111 NHB, 130 AS, 49 PI and 65 Hispanic (HS). All EOC patients had complete information on age at diagnosis, stage and chemotherapy treatment. During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 3.5 years (1.8-6.7), 702 EOC patients (61%) died of all causes. When comparing crude EOC patient characteristics by racial/ethnic group, NHW had the highest frequency of EOC leading to death (58% vs. < 49% in other groups). There also were differences in histology; NHW and NHB had a higher frequency of serous tumors ( > 56% of EOCs vs. < 52% in other groups); PI had a high proportion of endometrioid histology (14% of EOCs vs. < 11% in others); 10% of EOCs among AS had clear cell histology (vs. < 9% in others). HS had a high percentage of local disease (23% vs. < 20% in others). In multivariable survival analysis adjusting for clinical factors, we observed that compared with NHW, there were no differences in EOC survival by race/ethnicity: AS, HR = 0.80 (95% CI = 0.61-1.05); NHB, HR = 0.96 (95% CI = 0.72-1.28); PI, HR = 0.92 (95% CI = 0.58-1.46); and HS, HR = 0.82 (95% CI = 0.56-1.21). Conclusions: We observed no racial/ethnic disparities in EOC survival in a Military equal access treatment environment. These results highlight the importance of studying how differences in access to healthcare may impact observed racial/ethnic disparities for EOC.


Author(s):  
Daisy Duell ◽  
Roos Van Oort ◽  
Maarten Lindeboom ◽  
Xander Koolman ◽  
France Portrait

Practice variation is often defined as variation in access to healthcare - usually across regions - that cannot be explained by differences in patient populations. Practice variation may therefore lead to inefficiency and violate the principle of equal access to healthcare. The study of practice variation in long-term care (LTC) is a comparatively new area of research. This paper focuses on variation in publicly financed home care, which is gaining popularity as an alternative for institutional care. In addition, this paper focuses on whether and how patient experiences are associated with this variation. We use multinomial logistic regression analyses to assess regional variation in entitlements for publicly financed home care. Linear regression analyses were added to examine regional variation in intensity of entitled publicly financed home care, and the relationship between variation and patient experiences. The study showed a maximum difference of 34 percentage points across regions. Moreover, a maximum of 23 out of 31 regions showed significant differences in intensity of entitled care. Almost none of the observed variation can be explained by patient experiences. Our study showed evidence that eligibility for publicly financed home care depended partially on where a client lived. This study has been performed before the major decentralisation of the Dutch LTC system in January 2015. We expect regional variation to increase as a result of local demand, supply factors and the budgetary restrictions of the local stakeholders. This imposes challenges for countries as the Netherlands, which introduced a shift towards using more publicly financed home while striving towards equal access. Published: Online December 2020.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document