2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-200
Author(s):  
Justyna Łukaszewska‑Haberkowa

In the first part of this paper the definition of the protection of intangible cul­tural heritage is introduced, based on the 2003 UNESCO Convention as well as the Polish legislation concerning the protection of items on the national list of intangible culture. The second part shortly characterizes the Krakow bob­bin lace tradition along with its guardians, both present and past. In the third part it is systematically described what is being done to protect the tradition and craft in the Podgórze Culture Center thanks to the initiatives undertaken by certain guardians, and in the Historical Museum of the City of Krakow.


Author(s):  
Gabriele Rossi ◽  
Valentina Castagnolo

The object of this study is a group of architectural perspectives painted on the domes and walls of noble palaces in Apulia, in particular that the baronial palace in Botrugno, the Broquier palace in Trani, and the Manes palace in Bisceglie. The perspectives belong to the “Quadratura” genre that developed in Italy and Europe in the Baroque period, but the architectural solutions represented are specific of the Apulian regional context, of Neapolitan derivation, rather than linked to the noble models of the Emilian and Roman master experiences. These architectural perspectives can be considered belonging to that “immaterial cultural heritage,” as defined by the UNESCO Convention for the Protection of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of 2003, if we consider the cultural significance of these painting representations—as previously mentioned—for their relationship with the 16th-17th century painting season of “Quadratura,” for the massive production of treatises on perspective, as well as for the Baroque experiences and for the tradition in the use of “Festa” ephemeral architectures.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-68
Author(s):  
Rinitami Njatrijani

Abstract Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCE) is all the intangible cultural heritage, developed by local communities, collectively or individually in a non-systemic manner and that are inserted in the cultural and spiritual traditions of the communities. The catagories of TK and TCE ... “expressions of folklore in the form of  tekstual fonetic or verbal, music, dances, theater, fine art, ritual ceremony”. The legal framework of TCE in Indonesia that can be implemented as contained in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (Fourth Amendment) Article 32 (1), Article 38 and 39 on Copyright Law Number 28 Year 2014 on Copyright, Law Number 5 Year 2017 on Futherance Culture, Presidential Regulation No.78 Year 2007 on the Convention on Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage), Permendikbud N0.106 of 2013 on Intangible Cultural Heritage of Indonesia. Further provisions by the state are required to immediately ratify the Traditional Knowledge Bill and EBT into a separate law in Indonesia  Defensive protection TCEin Blora community is urgent to be protected as a whole so as not to be abused by others. The process of recording, stipulating, proposing to the Indonesian Conservation Heritage Agency on ICH Unesco's list is the final process of digital documentation in the database of intangible cultural heritage as official data of the state which has a positive impact on the welfare of its supporting community. This research indicates that there are only 16 cultural works for the community in Blora Regency that have been designated as Indonesian Culture Heritage / Intangible Cultural Heritage in accordance with UNESCO Convention Year 2003. While there are still many cultural works that need to be prioritized for immediate recording for next year. (Barong, batik motif etc). Keywords : Defensive Protection, Traditional  Cultural Expressions (Tce), Misappropriation, Digital Document. Abstrak TCE/Ekspresi budaya tradisional (EBT) adalah semua warisan budaya tak benda, yang dikembangkan oleh masyarakat lokal, secara kolektif atau individual dengan cara yang tidak sistemik dan disisipkan dalam tradisi budaya dan spiritual masyarakat. Kategori warisan budaya tak benda meliputi tradisi lisan, seni pertunjukkan, praktek-praktek sosial, ritual, perayaan-perayaan, pengetahuan dan praktek mengenai alam dan semesta atau pengetahuan dan ketrampilan untuk menghasilkan kerajinan tradisional. Kerangka hukum EBT di Indonesia  yang dapat diimplementasikn sebagaimana terdapat  dalam UUD RI Tahun 1945 (Amandemen ke empat) Pasal 32(1), Pasal 38 dan 39 tentang Undang-undang Hak Cipta Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta, Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 tentang Undang- Undang Pemajuan Kebudayaan yang lahir dalam rangka melindungi, memanfaatkan dan mengembangkan kebudayaan Indonesia, Perpres RI No.78 Tahun 2007 tentang Konvensi Perlindungan Warisan Budaya Takbenda), Permendikbud N0.106 Tahun 2013 tentang Warisan Budaya Takbenda Indonesia. Diperlukan ketentuan lebih lanjut oleh negara untuk segera mengesahkan RUU Pengetahuan Tradisional dan EBT menjadi Undang-Undang tersendiri di Indonesia.Perlindungan defensif EBT di masyarakat Kabupaten Blora sangat mendesak untuk dilindungi secara keseluruhan agar tidak disalahgunakan oleh pihak lain. Proses pencatatan, penetapan,  pengusulanke Badan Warisan Budaya Takbenda Indonesia dalam  daftar ICH Unesco merupakanproses akhir dokumentasi secara digital dalam database warisan budaya takbenda  sebagai data resmi negara yang memberikan dampak positif bagi kesejahteraan masyarakat pendukungnya.Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa baru ada 16 karya budaya bagi masyarakat di Kabupaten  Blora yang telah ditetapkan sebagai Warisan Budaya Tak Benda Indonesia/Intangible Cultural Heritagesesuai Konvensi UNESCO Tahun 2003.Sementara masih banyak karya-karya budaya yang perlu diprioritaskan untuk segera dilakukan pencatatan untuk tahun-tahun mendatang.(Barong, motif batik dll). Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Defensif, Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT), Penyalahgunaan,  Dokumen Digital.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-542
Author(s):  
Harriet Deacon

Abstract:“Traditional” foodways are represented as an important part of cultural heritage in Europe. Two legal instruments aim to play a role in safeguarding them—namely, the Traditional Specialties Guaranteed (TSG) scheme and the 2003 UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. These instruments are sometimes used in parallel—for example, in the TSG registration for “Pizza Napoletana” and the nomination of “the art of Neapolitan ‘pizzaiuolo’” to one of the lists of the Convention. While recognizing the important role of state actors in this process, this article proposes going beyond a simple “misappropriation” thesis to look at the possible economic effects of registration and inscription.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelena Ćuković

The same year that UNESCO adopted the Convention for the Protection of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, the Republic of Serbia became a member of the Council of Europe. The protection of the intangible and cultural heritage in the Republic of Serbia is done according to the regulations of these two institutions. This paper is based on a comparative analysis of two (for intangible) cultural heritage, the most important documents of individual institutions: the 2003 UNESCO Convention on the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity and the 2005 Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society. The aim of the paper is to compare the cultural conceptions of UNESCO and the Council of Europe, and to show whether there are differences in the cultural policies of one global and one European institution in this field.


2021 ◽  
pp. 77-86
Author(s):  
Simone Toji

This article considers some modes of activation and operationalization of the idea of social participation in the field of intangible cultural heritage. It regards the newest proposal of operating participation established by the UNESCO Convention on Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage and the experience of its implementation in Brazil. By analyzing how the issue of participation was developed through dialogue between the international and national levels, the paper also shows how the emergence of categories of social actors such as “communities” and “bearers” has been consolidated within the mentioned intangible cultural policies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document