The Unilateral Nature of Unilateral Juridical Acts

2015 ◽  
pp. 78-110
Keyword(s):  
Juridical Acts

Law Applicable to Unilateral Juridical Acts and Uniform Conflict-of-law Rules

2013 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Monika Pauknerová
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
European Regulation ◽  
Conflict Of Laws ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Technical Structure ◽  
Juridical Acts ◽  
Supranational Regulation ◽  
Conflict Of Law

Private international law smoothes the edges of civilian law and common law thanks to its specific legislative and technical structure. Conflict-of-law rules are considered to be neutral, and therefore more appropriate for unification, than substantive rules because countries are prepared to surrender their own individual solutions for the sake of uniform international or supranational regulation. This is evident in the successful unification of conflict-of-law rules at the global and European Union levels, as compared with the less common partial unifications of substantive rules. The paper illustrates several examples of unilateral legal acts in the European space, how diverse may be their substantive qualification in different legal systems, and what impacts these substantive differences may have upon the determination of the applicable law for obligations under European conflict-of-law rules. From the perspective of the conflict of laws, an issue remains open regarding what approach should be taken where a uniform legislative instrument – namely a European Regulation – fails to include a particular institution or act either expressly or impliedly.

Equal to the Constitution: the Sources of Law of Highest Legal Force in the Russian Federation

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Михаил Пресняков ◽  
Mikhail Pryesnyakov
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Juridical Acts ◽  
The Right

In article the question of validity of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and some other sources of the right which can also possess the highest validity is considered. In particular the author comes to a conclusion that legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation possess the highest validity and in total with the constitutional provisions represent the actual Constitution. On the other hand, both laws on amendments to the Constitution, and the universally recognized norms of international law on the validity stand below constitutional precepts of law. Acts of the Constitutional Assembly of the Russian Federation may in future be qualified as having the highest judicial effect. Such acts may abolish or change any provision of the present Constitution. At the same time the universally recognized norms of international law and the laws of the Russian Federation regulating amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation as independent juridical acts and sources of constitutional law are inferior as compared with the constitutional legal norms.

scholarly journals Merger and division nullity in the Romanian legal system

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bejan Felicia
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
European Directives ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Juridical Acts

As a consequence of the transposition of european Directives regarding the merger, division, and cross-border mergers, the Romanian legal system established a special legal framework with regard to the sanction of nullity for such juridical acts. The peculiarities of internal and cross-border reorganisation operations, and the imperative of protecting the interests of third parties, associates, and the companies involved led to the creation of a derogatory legal system on the matter. An analysis of both theoretical and practical perspectives of the subject matter may result in a useful instrument for the application of incidental legal norms, or every time restructuring juridical acts contravene the legal norms. 

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Yuridis Tentang Penyadapan sebagai Bagian dari Kegiatan Spionase yang Dikategorikan dalam Pelanggaran Kekebalan Diplomatik

2015 ◽  
pp. 218-240
Author(s):  
Dita Birahayu
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Common Good ◽  
The Common Good ◽  
The Common ◽  
Juridical Acts ◽  
Diplomatic Immunity

In international relations conducted between states, countries sending delegates to negotiate with other countries in order to promote and safeguard their interests in addition to work towards the common good. Many disorders that can occur in the case of countries conduct cooperation with other countries and can not be separated from the conflict, one of which is the treatment or unpleasant activities of the recipient countries where diplomatic representation is placed. As one example of the violation of diplomatic immunity and privileges of officials is espionage case between Indonesia and Australia that occurred some time ago. This is the case, then the sending country may submit an objection to the recipient (receiving state) and the receiving country shall be fully responsible for it. This paper will discuss how the settlement of juridical acts of espionage to diplomatic officials as a violation of diplomatic immunity.

Interpretation of the juridical acts

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 63-91
Author(s):  
YUN SEON HONG
Keyword(s):  
Juridical Acts
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document