scholarly journals Association Between Glycaemic Control and Serum Lipid Profile of Type 2 Diabetic Patients in University College Hospital Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Funmilayo Esther Omotoye
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (88) ◽  
pp. 4829-4832
Author(s):  
Darshna Jain ◽  
Manoj Narayan Paliwal ◽  
Mohammad Khaliq Shaikh ◽  
Shilpa Mittal ◽  
Prachi Paliwal ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Ghari Arab ◽  
Maryam Zahedi ◽  
Vahideh Kazemi Nejad ◽  
Akram Sanagoo ◽  
Maryam Azimi

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (65) ◽  
pp. 14129-14136
Author(s):  
Jain Darshna ◽  
Shaikh M K S ◽  
Jha R K ◽  
Mittal Shilpa ◽  
Shahi Deepasha

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-69
Author(s):  
Anil Shrestha

Introduction: Diabetic mellitus is a chronic metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia. Type 2 diabetes mellitus accounts for more than 90% of cases worldwide. Elevated HbA1c and dyslipidemia proportionately increases the risk of development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) which is the major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Aims: To Study the correlation between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and serum lipid profile in type 2 diabetic patients. Methods: This is a hospital based cross sectional study conducted at Nepalgunj medical college teaching hospital, which included 104 type 2 diabetic patients (54 males and 50 females).Venous blood samples were collected from all patients and serum was used for analyzing HbA1c, lipid profile panel and fasting blood glucose (FBG). DM was defined as per American diabetic association (ADA) criteria. Dyslipidemia was defined as per the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III Guidelines. The data were analyzed using standard statistical methods, including SPSS 21. Results : Abnormal lipid parameters were demonstrated with increased Total Chloseterol (TC), Triglyceride (TG), Low density lipoprotein (LDL),Very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low High density lipoprotein (HDL)  suggestive of dyslipidemia.HbA1c showed direct and significant correlation with TC,LDL,TG and VLDL. Patients with HbA1c  > 7.0% had a significantly higher value of TC, LDL, TG and VLDL as compared to patients with HbA1c ≤7.0%.However, the significant difference in value of HDL-C was not found between two groups. Conclusion: Due to the strong correlation with lipid profile, HbA1c could be the ideal marker for predicting dyslipidemia in type 2 DM . Patients with higher HbA1c value and dyslipidemia should be considered as a very high risk group for CVD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivashankara Bhat ◽  
Mukta Chowta ◽  
Nithyananda Chowta ◽  
Rajeshwari Shastry ◽  
Priyanka Kamath

Background: Type 2 diabetic patients often require insulin therapy for better glycaemic control. However, many of these patients do not receive insulin or do not receive it in a timely manner. Objective: The study was planned to assess the proportion of type 2 diabetic patients attaining treatment goals as per the ADA 2018 guidelines. In addition, patient’s perception on insulin therapy assessed and compared between insulin naïve and insulin initiated type 2 diabetic patients. Methods: The study was conducted in type 2 diabetic patients. Data on their demographics, medical history, duration of diabetes, history of diabetes related complications, the current antidiabetic medication received, most recent glycaemic parameters were noted. Patient’s perception on insulin initiation was recorded through structured interview. Results: A total of 129 patients were included in the study. Around 76.7% patients achieved HbA1c target (<7%). Duration of the disease is much higher in patients who did not meet the HBA1c target. A good number of patients felt that insulin injection would be physically painful (56.5%). Majority of the patients also felt that insulin will make their life less flexible (64.8%). Many patients are having the opinion that insulin is required for life long (73.2%). More number of patients on insulin agreed with the statement ‘Leads to good short-term outcomes as well as long-term benefits’ compared to insulin naïve patients. Conclusion: The results highlight that the proportion of patients achieving recommended glycaemic target is not satisfactory. Many patients who are inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs were reluctant to initiate insulin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document