scholarly journals Does early processing of low-spatial frequency fearful facial expressions vary as a function of autistic tendency?

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Laila Hugrass ◽  
Adelaide Burt ◽  
Tasha Firth-Belvedere ◽  
David Crewther
Author(s):  
Shozo Tobimatsu

There are two major parallel pathways in humans: the parvocellular (P) and magnocellular (M) pathways. The former has excellent spatial resolution with color selectivity, while the latter shows excellent temporal resolution with high contrast sensitivity. Visual stimuli should be tailored to answer specific clinical and/or research questions. This chapter examines the neural mechanisms of face perception using event-related potentials (ERPs). Face stimuli of different spatial frequencies were used to investigate how low-spatial-frequency (LSF) and high-spatial-frequency (HSF) components of the face contribute to the identification and recognition of the face and facial expressions. The P100 component in the occipital area (Oz), the N170 in the posterior temporal region (T5/T6) and late components peaking at 270-390 ms (T5/T6) were analyzed. LSF enhanced P100, while N170 was augmented by HSF irrespective of facial expressions. This suggested that LSF is important for global processing of facial expressions, whereas HSF handles featural processing. There were significant amplitude differences between positive and negative LSF facial expressions in the early time windows of 270-310 ms. Subsequently, the amplitudes among negative HSF facial expressions differed significantly in the later time windows of 330–390 ms. Discrimination between positive and negative facial expressions precedes discrimination among different negative expressions in a sequential manner based on parallel visual channels. Interestingly, patients with schizophrenia showed decreased spatial frequency sensitivities for face processing. Taken together, the spatially filtered face images are useful for exploring face perception and recognition.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martial Mermillod ◽  
Patrik Vuilleumier ◽  
Carole Peyrin ◽  
David Alleysson ◽  
Christian Marendaz

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Yi Jin ◽  
John S. Y. Chan ◽  
Feng-Chi Yang ◽  
Fang Cui

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Comfort ◽  
Meng Wang ◽  
Christopher P. Benton ◽  
Yossi Zana

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiebke Hammerschmidt ◽  
Louisa Kulke ◽  
Christina BrÖring ◽  
Annekathrin Schacht

In comparison to neutral faces, facial expressions of emotion are known to gain attentional prioritization, mainly demonstrated by means of event-related potentials (ERPs). Recent evidence indicated that such a preferential processing can also be elicited by neutral faces when associated with increased motivational salience via reward. It remains, however, an open question whether impacts of inherent emotional salience and associated motivational salience might be integrated. To this aim, expressions and outcomes were orthogonally combined. Participants (N=42) learned to explicitly categorize happy and neutral faces as either reward- or zero-outcome-related via an associative learning paradigm. ERP components (P1, N170, EPN, and LPC) were measured throughout the experiment, and separately analyzed before (learning phase) and after (consolidation phase) reaching a pre-defined learning criterion. Happy facial expressions boosted early processing stages, as reflected in enhanced amplitudes of the N170 and EPN, both during learning and consolidation. In contrast, effects of monetary reward became evident only after successful learning and in form of enlarged amplitudes of the LPC, a component linked to higher-order evaluations. Interactions between expressions and associated outcome were absent in all ERP components of interest. The present study provides novel evidence that acquired salience impacts stimulus processing but independent of the effects driven by happy facial expressions.


Author(s):  
Shozo Tobimatsu

There are two major parallel pathways in humans: the parvocellular (P) and magnocellular (M) pathways. The former has excellent spatial resolution with color selectivity, while the latter shows excellent temporal resolution with high contrast sensitivity. Visual stimuli should be tailored to answer specific clinical and/or research questions. This chapter examines the neural mechanisms of face perception using event-related potentials (ERPs). Face stimuli of different spatial frequencies were used to investigate how low-spatial-frequency (LSF) and high-spatial-frequency (HSF) components of the face contribute to the identification and recognition of the face and facial expressions. The P100 component in the occipital area (Oz), the N170 in the posterior temporal region (T5/T6) and late components peaking at 270-390 ms (T5/T6) were analyzed. LSF enhanced P100, while N170 was augmented by HSF irrespective of facial expressions. This suggested that LSF is important for global processing of facial expressions, whereas HSF handles featural processing. There were significant amplitude differences between positive and negative LSF facial expressions in the early time windows of 270-310 ms. Subsequently, the amplitudes among negative HSF facial expressions differed significantly in the later time windows of 330–390 ms. Discrimination between positive and negative facial expressions precedes discrimination among different negative expressions in a sequential manner based on parallel visual channels. Interestingly, patients with schizophrenia showed decreased spatial frequency sensitivities for face processing. Taken together, the spatially filtered face images are useful for exploring face perception and recognition.


2016 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 138-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Shaozheng Qin ◽  
Zhuxi Yao ◽  
Kan Zhang ◽  
Jianhui Wu

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail Webb ◽  
Paul Hibbard

Perceptual biases for fearful facial expressions are observed across many studies. According to the low-level, visual-based account of these biases, fear expressions are advantaged in some way due to their image properties, such as low spatial frequency content. Breaking continuous flash suppression (b-CFS) has explored these effects, and demonstrated similar biases for detecting fearful facial expressions. However, there is a degree of empirical disagreement regarding the range of spatial frequency content. Recent findings from a b-CFS study highlight the role of high, rather than low spatial frequency content in determining faces’ visibility. The present study contributes to ongoing discussions regarding the efficacy of b-CFS, and shows that the visibility of facial expressions varies according to how faces are normalised for physical contrast and spatially filtered. Findings show limited evidence of a bias for detecting fearful facial expressions, but importantly, they show that such biases are less likely to occur when faces are normalised for apparent, perceived contrast, compared to physical contrast. Together these findings further the current understanding of the combined effects of spatial frequency and contrast on face visibility under b-CFS, and raise important questions regarding procedures used to standardise facial stimuli.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document