scholarly journals Saccadic latency and choice in a concurrent random interval reinforcement schedule.

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 855
Author(s):  
Cécile Vullings ◽  
Laurent Madelain
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Schedule ◽  
Saccadic Latency ◽  
Random Interval

Non-Contingent Reinforcement in Concurrent Chain Schedules

1973 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 215-218
Author(s):  
Gerald D. Lachter
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Schedule ◽  
Interval Schedule ◽  
Contingent Reinforcement ◽  
Random Interval ◽  
Concurrent Chains ◽  
Chain Schedules ◽  
Concurrent Chain

2 pigeons were exposed to a concurrent-chains procedure consisting of identical 60-sec. random-interval initial links and terminal links which resulted in reinforcement on either a 60-sec. random-interval schedule, or a 30-sec., 60-sec., or 120-sec. non-contingent reinforcement schedule. For both Ss, data indicated a preference for the non-contingent reinforcement schedule at both the 30- and 60-sec. values.

SACCADIC LATENCY AS A FUNCTION OF TARGET DURATION IN A SPATIAL LOCALIZATION TASK

2006 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 165 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDITHA M. VAN LOON
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Localization ◽  
Target Duration ◽  
Saccadic Latency ◽  
Localization Task

scholarly journals Typical Behaviour of Random Interval Homeomorphisms

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaroslav Bradík ◽  
Samuel Roth
Keyword(s):  
Random Interval ◽  
Typical Behaviour

scholarly journals Representations of hermite processes using local time of intersecting stationary stable regenerative sets

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 1234-1251
Author(s):  
Shuyang Bai
Keyword(s):  
Long Range ◽  
Local Time ◽  
Limit Theorems ◽  
Local Times ◽  
Long Range Dependence ◽  
Random Interval ◽  
Stationary Increments ◽  
Self Similar ◽  
Regenerative Sets

AbstractHermite processes are a class of self-similar processes with stationary increments. They often arise in limit theorems under long-range dependence. We derive new representations of Hermite processes with multiple Wiener–Itô integrals, whose integrands involve the local time of intersecting stationary stable regenerative sets. The proof relies on an approximation of regenerative sets and local times based on a scheme of random interval covering.

Selective Action of Pentobarbital on Component Behaviors of a Reinforcement Schedule

Science ◽  
1956 ◽  
Vol 124 (3217) ◽  
pp. 367-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. HERRNSTEIN ◽  
W. H. MORSE
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Schedule ◽  
Selective Action

“Freeloading” in a Runway as a Function of Amount of Training and Type of Reinforcement Schedule

1968 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin M. Leung ◽  
Glen D. Jensen ◽  
Richard P. Tapley
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Schedule ◽  
Schedule Of Reinforcement ◽  
Single Pellet ◽  
Skinner Box

2 groups of 60 rats received either 75 or 285 runs in a runway before being given a choice between freeloading from a dish of pellets in the start box or running the maze for a single pellet. The 285-trial Ss showed less willingness to perform the operant than the 75-trial Ss. This is opposite to what Jensen (1963) had found in the Skinner box. Schedule of reinforcement (100 vs 50%) during training did not significantly affect freeloading scores.

Time-variant random interval response of concrete-filled steel tubular composite curved structures

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 122-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binhua Wu ◽  
Di Wu ◽  
Wei Gao ◽  
Chongmin Song
Keyword(s):  
Random Interval ◽  
Curved Structures ◽  
Interval Response

Noncontingent Nonreinforcement of a Response as the Aversive Event in a Cer Paradigm

1971 ◽  
Vol 29 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1196-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Calef ◽  
Richard A. Kaufman ◽  
Ronald N. Bone ◽  
Steven A. Werk
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Schedule ◽  
Present Experiment ◽  
High Density ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Aversive Event ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Response Facilitation ◽  
Early Training ◽  
Low Rate

The present experiment investigated the effects of noncontingent nonreinforcement as the aversive event in a CER paradigm. The results showed a significant response-facilitation effect during early training, but none during later training with a high rate-producing, high-density reinforcement schedule. The present results imply that a low rate-producing, high-density reinforcement schedule is not a necessary condition for response facilitation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document