Associations between I/D polymorphism in the ACE gene and lung cancer: an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis

Background We evaluated the association between the I/D polymorphism in the ACE gene and lung cancer risk by performing a meta-analysis. Methods The heterogeneity in the study was tested using the Cochran χ2-based Q statistic test and I2 test, and then the random ratio or fixed effect was utilized to merge the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the strength of the association between ACE polymorphisms and susceptibility to lung cancer. Sensitivity analysis was also performed. Using funnel plot and Begg’s rank test, we investigated the publication bias. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.0 and RevMan 5.3. Results A total of 4307 participants (2181 patients; 2126 controls) were included in the 12 case–control studies. No significant association was found between the ACE I/D polymorphism and lung cancer risk (II vs. ID + DD: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.89–1.68; II + ID vs. DD: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.90–1.63; I vs. D: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.95–1.39). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no significant association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and lung cancer risk was found among Asian and Caucasian populations for the comparisons of II vs. ID + DD, II + ID vs. DD, and I vs. D genetic models. Conclusion The ACE I/D polymorphism is not associated with the risk of lung cancer.

Associations Between I/ D polymorphism in the ACE gene and lung cancer: an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis

Background: This study has evaluated the association between the I/D polymorphism in the ACE gene and lung cancer risk by constructing a meta-analysis.Methods: The heterogeneity in the study was tested by the Cochran c2-based Q statistic test and I2 test, and then the random ratio or fixed effect was utilized to merge the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), to estimate the strength of the association between ACE polymorphisms and susceptibility to lung cancer. We have performed Sensitivity analysis. Using funnel plot and Begg's rank test investigated the publication bias. All data Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.0 and Revman 5.3.Results: A total of 4307 participants (2181 patients; 2126 controls) were included in twelve case-control studies selected. No significant association was found between the ACE I/D polymorphism and lung cancer risks (II vs ID + DD: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.89–1.68; II + ID vs DD: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.90–1.63; I vs D: OR =1.15, 95% CI = 0.95–1.39). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no significant association between this polymorphism and lung cancer risks was also found among Asia and Caucasian populations for the comparison of II vs ID + DD, II + ID vs DD and I vs D genetic models.Conclusion: Our study indicated that the ACE I/ D polymorphism was not associated with the risk of lung cancer.

Associations Between I/ D polymorphism in the ACE gene and lung cancer: an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis

BackgroundThis study has evaluated the association between the I/D polymorphism in the ACE gene and lung cancer risk by constructing a meta-analysis.MethodsThe heterogeneity in the study was tested by the Q-test and I2, and then the random ratio or fixed effect was utilized to merge the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), to estimate the strength of the association between ACE polymorphisms and susceptibility to lung cancer. We have performed Sensitivity analysis. Using funnel plot and Begger’s regression test investigated the publication bias. All data Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.0 and Revman 5.3.ResultsA total of 4307 participants (2181 patients; 2126 controls) were included in twelve case-control studies selected. No significant association was found between the ACE I/D polymorphism and lung cancer risks (II vs ID + DD: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.89–1.68; II + ID vs DD: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.90–1.63; I vs D: OR =1.15, 95% CI = 0.95–1.39). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no significant association between this polymorphism and lung cancer risks was also found among Asia and Caucasian populations for the comparison of II vs ID + DD, II + ID vs DD and I vs D genetic models.ConclusionOur study indicated that the ACE I/ D polymorphism was not associated with the risk of lung cancer.

The CEBPE rs2239633 genetic polymorphism on susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: An updated meta-analysis

Background: We performed an updated meta-analysis to clarify the relationship between the CEBPE rs2239633 polymorphism and the CALL susceptibility.Methods: All the case-control studies updated on July 31, 2019 through Web of Science, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China Nationa Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) electronic database. The heterogeneity in the study was tested by the Q-test and I2, and then the random ratio or fixed effect was utilized to merge the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). To estimate the impact of individual studies on aggregate estimates, we performed sensitivity analysis. Using funnel plot and Begger’s regression test investigated the publication bias. All data Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.0.Results: A total of 23442 participants (7014 patients; 16428 controls) were included in twenty case-control studies selected. There was no association of CEBPE rs2239633 polymorphism with CALL (CC vs CT + TT: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.94 –1.26; CC + CT vs TT: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.94–1.30; C vs T: OR =1.02, 95% CI = 0.92–1.13). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no significant association of this polymorphism and CALL risks among Asia and Caucasian populations for the comparison of CC vs CT + TT, CC + CT vs TT and C vs T genetic models .Conclusion: This meta-analysis did not find the CEBPE rs2239633 polymorphism can increase and decrease the risk of susceptibility to CALL.

Associations Between I/ D polymorphism in the ACE gene and lung cancer: an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis

Objectives Previous studies have shown that the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene was associated with lung cancer susceptibility, but there have been conflicts in previously reported results. Therefore, this study has evaluated the association between the I/D polymorphism in the ACE gene and lung cancer risk by constructing a meta-analysis. Methods The study was performed in Web of Science, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China Nationa Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) electronic database, covering relevant studies published until June 31, 2019. The heterogeneity in the study was tested by the Q-test and I2, and then the random ratio or fixed effect was utilized to merge the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). To estimate the strength of the association between ACE polymorphisms and susceptibility to lung cancer. We have performed Sensitivity analysis. Using funnel plot and begger’s regression test investigated the publication bias. All data Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.0 and Revman 5.3. Results A total of 4307 participants (2181 patients; 2126 controls) were included in twelve case-control studies selected. No significant association was found between the ACE I/D polymorphism and lung cancer risks (II vs ID + DD: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.89–1.68; II + ID vs DD: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.90–1.63; I vs D: OR =1.15, 95% CI = 0.95–1.39). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no significant association between this polymorphism and lung cancer risks was also found among Asia and Caucasian populations for the comparison of II vs ID + DD, II + ID vs DD and I vs D genetic models. Conclusion Our study indicated that the ACE I/D polymorphism was not associated with the risk of lung cancer.

Theoretical background for the development of stationary process of grain mass threshing with a combine harvester

The article considers the issue that further improvement of the grain combine design with the classical threshing-separating device is possible due to the development of its technological scheme based on the principle of modular construction and stationary process of threshing grain mass. To achieve this goal, the problems were solved, by which laws were revealed and a mathematical description of the technological process of the combine harvester was given, as well as patterns characterizing the effect of straw on the process of grain mass threshing were revealed. In the course of research and evaluation of the effectiveness of the combine harvester’s usage the basic laws characterizing the technological process of combine harvester with the classical threshing-separating device are established. The change of the working speed of the combine depends on the technological properties of grain crops. It is revealed that the coefficient of solomitol grain mass δс is possible to reduce during combining grain crops through the application of high-cut stems. It was found that with the increase in the height of the cut of the stems (wheat) from 0.10 to 0.20 m, the coefficient of straw content of the grain mass decreases from 0.726 to 0.578. The additional material of experimental studies to determine the coefficient of straw content of the grain mass δc depending on the diameter and length of the pinned part of the stem is presented. When harvesting grain crops by the method of combing, a grain-bearing mass is formed, which is characterized by a random ratio of the fractions of the straw of the stalk of the annular part. The chaotic structure of plant parts temosolomida mass poses new challenges to supply it in the threshing-machine combine harvester with a classic threshingseparating device.

mTORC1 In the Orbitofrontal Cortex Promotes Habitual Alcohol Seeking

The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORCl) plays an important role in dendritic translation, synaptic plasticity, and learning and memory. We previously showed that heavy alcohol use activates mTORC1 in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) of rodents. Here, we set out to determine the consequences of alcohol-dependent mTORC1 activation in the OFC. We found that although inhibition of mTORC1 in the OFC does not alter rat alcohol intake per se, it attenuates alcohol seeking. We then tested whether mTORC1 in the OFC is required for goal-directed or habitual alcohol seeking. To do so, rats were trained self-administer alcohol under a random ratio (RR) or a random interval (RI) schedule of reinforcement, which biases toward goal-directed or habitual responding, respectively, and tested whether mTORC1 inhibition alters lever presses following alcohol devaluation. We found that pharmacological inhibition of mTORC1 or knockdown of the adaptor protein, Raptor, did not affect goal-directed alcohol responding but restored sensitivity to devaluation in RI-trained rats. In contrast, habitual responding for sucrose was unaltered by mTORC1 inhibition. These data suggest that mTORC1 in the OFC drives alcohol habit. We then elucidate the mechanism by which mTORC1 is activated by alcohol, and found that the recruitment of GluN2B during alcohol withdrawal stimulates mTORC1 in OFC cFos-positive neurons. Finally, we show that inhibition of GluN2B in the OFC attenuates both alcohol seeking and habitual responding for alcohol. Together, our data suggest that alcohol withdrawal promotes an NMDAR-dependent activation of mTORC1 which in turn drives habitual alcohol seeking.

Human instrumental performance in ratio and interval contingencies: A challenge for associative theory

Associative learning theories regard the probability of reinforcement as the critical factor determining responding. However, the role of this factor in instrumental conditioning is not completely clear. In fact, free-operant experiments show that participants respond at a higher rate on variable ratio than on variable interval schedules even though the reinforcement probability is matched between the schedules. This difference has been attributed to the differential reinforcement of long inter-response times (IRTs) by interval schedules, which acts to slow responding. In the present study, we used a novel experimental design to investigate human responding under random ratio (RR) and regulated probability interval (RPI) schedules, a type of interval schedule that sets a reinforcement probability independently of the IRT duration. Participants responded on each type of schedule before a final choice test in which they distributed responding between two schedules similar to those experienced during training. Although response rates did not differ during training, the participants responded at a lower rate on the RPI schedule than on the matched RR schedule during the choice test. This preference cannot be attributed to a higher probability of reinforcement for long IRTs and questions the idea that similar associative processes underlie classical and instrumental conditioning.