scholarly journals A motion-energy-based optimization method for generating an image sequence causing four-stroke apparent motion illusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2867
Author(s):  
Takahiro Kawabe ◽  
Yuki Kubota ◽  
Taiki Fukiage
i-Perception ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 204166952096110
Author(s):  
Chien-Chung Chen ◽  
Hiroshi Ashida ◽  
Xirui Yang ◽  
Pei-Yin Chen

In a stimulus with multiple moving elements, an observer may perceive that the whole stimulus moves in unison if (a) one can associate an element in one frame with one in the next (correspondence) and (b) a sufficient proportion of correspondences signal a similar motion direction (coherence). We tested the necessity of these two conditions by asking the participants to rate the perceived intensity of linear, concentric, and radial motions for three types of stimuli: (a) random walk motion, in which the direction of each dot was randomly determined for each frame, (b) random image sequence, which was a set of uncorrelated random dot images presented in sequence, and (c) global motion, in which 35% of dots moved coherently. The participants perceived global motion not only in the global motion conditions but also in the random image sequences, though not in random walk motion. The type of perceived motion in the random image sequences depends on the spatial context of the stimuli. Thus, although there is neither a fixed correspondence across different frames nor a coherent motion direction, observers can still perceive global motion in the random image sequence. This result cannot be explained by motion energy or local aperture border effects.


i-Perception ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 204166952093910
Author(s):  
Jean Lorenceau ◽  
Patrick Cavanagh

When an annulus in fast apparent motion reverses its contrast over time, the foveal and peripheral percepts are strikingly different. In central vision, the annulus appears to follow the same path as an annulus without flicker, whereas in the periphery, the stimulus seems to randomly jump across the screen. The illusion strength depends on motion speed and reversal rate. Our observations suggest that it results from a balance between conflicting phi and reverse-phi motion, positional uncertainty, and attention. In addition to illustrating the differences between central and peripheral motion processing, this illusion shows that both discrete positional sampling and motion energy combine to generate motion percepts, although with eccentricity dependent weights that are themselves affected by attention.


2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 015102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tongwei Zhang ◽  
Yongjiang Huang ◽  
Haibing Li ◽  
Songbing Wang ◽  
Xiaole Guo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document