scholarly journals Radiance Comparisons of MODIS and AIRS Using Spatial Response Information

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1331-1342 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Schreier ◽  
B. H. Kahn ◽  
A. Eldering ◽  
D. A. Elliott ◽  
E. Fishbein ◽  
...  

Abstract The combination of multiple satellite instruments on a pixel-by-pixel basis is a difficult task, even for instruments collocated in space and time, such as the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) on board the Earth Observing System (EOS) Aqua. Toward the goal of an improved collocation methodology, the channel- and scan angle–dependent spatial response functions of AIRS that were obtained from prelaunch measurements and calculated impacts from scan geometry are shown within the context of radiance comparisons. The AIRS spatial response functions are used to improve the averaging of MODIS radiances to the AIRS footprint, and the variability of brightness temperature differences (ΔTb) between MODIS and AIRS are quantified on a channel-by-channel basis. To test possible connections between ΔTb and the derived level 2 (L2) datasets, cloud characteristics derived from MODIS are used to highlight correlations between these quantities and ΔTb, especially for ice clouds in H2O and CO2 bands. Furthermore, correlations are quantified for temperature lapse rate (dT/dp) and the magnitude of water vapor mixing ratio (q) obtained from AIRS L2 retrievals. Larger values of dT/dp and q correlate well to larger values of ΔTb in the H2O and CO2 bands. These correlations were largely eliminated or reduced after the MODIS spectral response functions were shifted by recommended values. While this investigation shows that the AIRS spatial response functions are necessary to reduce the variability and skewness of ΔTb within heterogeneous scenes, improved knowledge about MODIS spectral response functions is necessary to reduce biases in ΔTb.

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1387-1412
Author(s):  
Jonas Witthuhn ◽  
Anja Hünerbein ◽  
Hartwig Deneke

Abstract. Reliable reference measurements over the ocean are essential for the evaluation and improvement of satellite- and model-based aerosol datasets. Within the framework of the Maritime Aerosol Network, shipborne reference datasets have been collected over the Atlantic Ocean since 2004 with Microtops Sun photometers. These were recently complemented by measurements with the multi-spectral GUVis-3511 shadowband radiometer during five cruises with the research vessel Polarstern. The aerosol optical depth (AOD) uncertainty estimate of both shipborne instruments of ±0.02 can be confirmed if the GUVis instrument is cross calibrated to the Microtops instrument to account for differences in calibration, and if an empirical correction to account for the broad shadowband as well as the effects of forward scattering is introduced. Based on these two datasets, a comprehensive evaluation of aerosol products from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) flown on NASA's Earth Observing System satellites, the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) aboard the geostationary Meteosat satellite, and the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service reanalysis (CAMS RA) is presented. For this purpose, focus is given to the accuracy of the AOD at 630 nm in combination with the Ångström exponent (AE), discussed in the context of the ambient aerosol type. In general, the evaluation of MODIS AOD from the official level-2 aerosol products of C6.1 against the Microtops AOD product confirms that 76 % of data points fall into the expected error limits given by previous validation studies. The SEVIRI-based AOD product exhibits a 25 % larger scatter than the MODIS AOD products at the instrument's native spectral channels. Further, the comparison of CAMS RA and MODIS AOD versus the shipborne reference shows similar performance for both datasets, with some differences arising from the assimilation and model assumptions. When considering aerosol conditions, an overestimation of AE is found for scenes dominated by desert dust for MODIS and SEVIRI products versus the shipborne reference dataset. As the composition of the mixture of aerosol in satellite products is constrained by model assumptions, this highlights the importance of considering the aerosol type in evaluation studies for identifying problematic aspects.


2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 338-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman G. Loeb ◽  
Seiji Kato ◽  
Konstantin Loukachine ◽  
Natividad Manalo-Smith

Abstract The Clouds and Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) provides coincident global cloud and aerosol properties together with reflected solar, emitted terrestrial longwave, and infrared window radiative fluxes. These data are needed to improve the understanding and modeling of the interaction between clouds, aerosols, and radiation at the top of the atmosphere, surface, and within the atmosphere. This paper describes the approach used to estimate top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes from instantaneous CERES radiance measurements on the Terra satellite. A key component involves the development of empirical angular distribution models (ADMs) that account for the angular dependence of the earth’s radiation field at the TOA. The CERES Terra ADMs are developed using 24 months of CERES radiances, coincident cloud and aerosol retrievals from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and meteorological parameters from the Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO)’s Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Data Assimilation System (DAS) V4.0.3 product. Scene information for the ADMs is from MODIS retrievals and GEOS DAS V4.0.3 properties over the ocean, land, desert, and snow for both clear and cloudy conditions. Because the CERES Terra ADMs are global, and far more CERES data are available on Terra than were available from CERES on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM), the methodology used to define CERES Terra ADMs is different in many respects from that used to develop CERES TRMM ADMs, particularly over snow/sea ice, under cloudy conditions, and for clear scenes over land and desert.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 3215-3247 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Meirink ◽  
R. A. Roebeling ◽  
P. Stammes

Abstract. Accurate calibration of satellite imagers is a prerequisite for using their measurements in climate applications. Here we present a method for the inter-calibration of geostationary and polar-orbiting imager solar channels based on regressions of collocated near-nadir radiances. Specific attention is paid to correcting for differences in spectral response between instruments. The method is used to calibrate the solar channels of the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) on the geostationary Meteosat satellite with corresponding channels of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on the polar-orbiting Aqua satellite. The SEVIRI operational calibration is found to be stable during the years 2004 to 2009 but off by −8, −6, and +3.5% for channels 1 (0.6 μm), 2 (0.8 μm), and 3 (1.6 μm), respectively. These results are robust for a range of choices that can be made regarding data collocation and selection, as long as the viewing and illumination geometries of the two instruments are matched. Uncertainties in the inter-calibration method are estimated to be 1% for channel 1 and 1.5% for channels 2 and 3. A specific application of the method is the inter-calibration of polar imagers using SEVIRI as a transfer instrument. This offers an alternative to direct inter-calibration, which in general has to rely on high-latitude collocations. Using this method we have tied MODIS-Terra and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) instruments on National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) satellites 17 and 18 to MODIS-Aqua for the years 2007 to 2009. While reflectances of the two MODIS instruments differ less than 2% for all channels considered, deviations of an existing AVHRR calibration from MODIS-Aqua reach −3.5 and +2.5% for the 0.8 and 1.6 μm channels, respectively.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Witthuhn ◽  
Anja Hünerbein ◽  
Hartwig Deneke

Abstract. Reliable reference measurements over ocean are essential for the evaluation and improvement of satellite- and model-based aerosol datasets. Within the framework of the Maritime Aerosol Network, shipborne reference datasets have been collected over the Atlantic ocean since 2004 with Microtops sun photometers. These were recently complemented by measurements with the multi-spectral shadowband radiometer GUVis-3511 during five cruises with the research vessel Polarstern. The AOD uncertainty estimate of both ship-borne instruments of ±0.02 can be confirmed, if the GUVis instrument is cross-calibrated to the Microtops instrument to account for differences in calibration, and an empirical correction to account for the broad shadowband and the effects of forward-scattering is introduced. Based on these two datasets, a comprehensive evaluation of aerosol products from the Moderate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) flown on NASA's Earth Observing System satellites, the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infra-Red Imager (SEVIRI) onboard the geostationary Meteosat satellite, and the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service reanalysis (CAMSRA) is presented. For this purpose, focus is given to the accuracy of the aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 630 nm in combination with the Angström exponent (AE), discussed in the context of the ambient aerosol type. In general, the evaluation of MODIS AOD from the official Level-2 aerosol products of C6.1 against the Microtops AOD product confirms that 76 % of datapoints fall into the expected error limits given by previous validation studies. The SEVIRI-based AOD product exhibits a 25 % larger scatter than the MODIS AOD products at the instrument's native spectral channels. Further, the comparison of CAMSRA and MODIS AOD versus the shipborne reference show similar performances of both datasets, with some differences arising from the assimilation and model assumptions. When considering aerosol conditions, an overestimation of AE is found for scenes dominated by desert dust for MODIS and SEVIRI products versus the shipborne reference dataset. This highlights the importance of considering aerosol type in evaluation studies for identifying problematic aspects.


2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 2259-2270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Hsuan Lyu ◽  
William L. Barnes

Abstract After 10 years of successful operation of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)/Visible Infrared Scanner (VIRS), based on sensor performance, the authors have reexamined the calibration algorithms and identified several ways to improve the current VIRS level-1B radiometric calibration software. This study examines the trends in VIRS on-orbit calibration results by using lunar measurements to enable separation of the solar diffuser degradation from that of the VIRS Earth-viewing sensor and by comparing the radiometric data with two nearly identical Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instruments on board the NASA Earth Observing System (EOS) Terra and Aqua satellites. For the VIRS, with spectral bands quite similar to several of the MODIS bands, the integrated lunar reflectance data were measured, from January 1998 to March 2007, at phase angles ranging from 0.94° to 121.8°. The authors present trending of the lunar data over periods of 4 yr (Aqua/MODIS), 6 yr (Terra/MODIS), and 10 yr (TRMM/VIRS) and use these observations to examine instrument radiometric stability. The VIRS-measured lunar irradiances are compared with the MODIS-measured lunar irradiances at phase angles around 54°–56°. With the upcoming modified VIRS level-1B version 7 calibration algorithm, the VIRS, along with MODIS, should provide better references for intercalibrating multiple Earth-observing sensors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document