scholarly journals The Influence of Assimilating Dropsonde Data on Typhoon Track and Midlatitude Forecasts

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (3) ◽  
pp. 908-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Weissmann ◽  
Florian Harnisch ◽  
Chun-Chieh Wu ◽  
Po-Hsiung Lin ◽  
Yoichiro Ohta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Variational Data Assimilation ◽  
Japan Meteorological Agency ◽  
Limited Area ◽  
Track Forecast ◽  
Forecast Errors ◽  
Typhoon Track ◽  
Environmental Prediction

Abstract A unique dataset of targeted dropsonde observations was collected during The Observing System Research and Predictability Experiment (THORPEX) Pacific Asian Regional Campaign (T-PARC) in the autumn of 2008. The campaign was supplemented by an enhancement of the operational Dropsonde Observations for Typhoon Surveillance near the Taiwan Region (DOTSTAR) program. For the first time, up to four different aircraft were available for typhoon observations and over 1500 additional soundings were collected. This study investigates the influence of assimilating additional observations during the two major typhoon events of T-PARC on the typhoon track forecast by the global models of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), and the limited-area Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Additionally, the influence of T-PARC observations on ECMWF midlatitude forecasts is investigated. All models show an improving tendency of typhoon track forecasts, but the degree of improvement varied from about 20% to 40% in NCEP and WRF to a comparably low influence in ECMWF and JMA. This is likely related to lower track forecast errors without dropsondes in the latter two models, presumably caused by a more extensive use of satellite data and four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4D-Var) of ECMWF and JMA compared to three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3D-Var) of NCEP and WRF. The different behavior of the models emphasizes that the benefit gained strongly depends on the quality of the first-guess field and the assimilation system.

Intercomparison of an Ensemble Kalman Filter with Three- and Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation Methods in a Limited-Area Model over the Month of June 2003

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 566-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Zhang ◽  
Fuqing Zhang ◽  
Xiang-Yu Huang ◽  
Xin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Forecast Error ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Warm Season ◽  
Variational Data Assimilation ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Limited Area ◽  
Forecast Errors

Abstract This study compares the performance of an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) with both the three-dimensional and four-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVar and 4DVar) methods of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model over the contiguous United States in a warm-season month (June) of 2003. The data assimilated every 6 h include conventional sounding and surface observations as well as data from wind profilers, ships and aircraft, and the cloud-tracked winds from satellites. The performances of these methods are evaluated through verifying the 12- to 72-h forecasts initialized twice daily from the analysis of each method against the standard sounding observations. It is found that 4DVar has consistently smaller error than that of 3DVar for winds and temperature at all forecast lead times except at 60 and 72 h when their forecast errors become comparable in amplitude, while the two schemes have similar performance in moisture at all lead times. The forecast error of the EnKF is comparable to that of the 4DVar at 12–36-h lead times, both of which are substantially smaller than that of the 3DVar, despite the fact that 3DVar fits the sounding observations much more closely at the analysis time. The advantage of the EnKF becomes even more evident at 48–72-h lead times; the 72-h forecast error of the EnKF is comparable in magnitude to the 48-h error of 3DVar/4DVar.

Comparing Limited-Area 3DVAR and Hybrid Variational-Ensemble Data Assimilation Methods for Typhoon Track Forecasts: Sensitivity to Outer Loops and Vortex Relocation

2013 ◽  
Vol 141 (12) ◽  
pp. 4350-4372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig S. Schwartz ◽  
Zhiquan Liu ◽  
Xiang-Yu Huang ◽  
Ying-Hwa Kuo ◽  
Chin-Tzu Fong
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Limited Area ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Ensemble Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Data ◽  
Typhoon Track ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) “hybrid” variational-ensemble data assimilation (DA) algorithm was used to initialize WRF model forecasts of three tropical cyclones (TCs). The hybrid-initialized forecasts were compared to forecasts initialized by WRF's three-dimensional variational (3DVAR) DA system. An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter (EAKF) updated a 32-member WRF-based ensemble system that provided flow-dependent background error covariances for the hybrid. The 3DVAR, hybrid, and EAKF configurations cycled continuously for ~3.5 weeks and produced new analyses every 6 h that initialized 72-h WRF forecasts with 45-km horizontal grid spacing. Additionally, the impact of employing a TC relocation technique and using multiple outer loops (OLs) in the 3DVAR and hybrid minimizations were explored. Model output was compared to conventional, dropwindsonde, and TC “best track” observations. On average, the hybrid produced superior forecasts compared to 3DVAR when only one OL was used during minimization. However, when three OLs were employed, 3DVAR forecasts were dramatically improved but the mean hybrid performance changed little. Additionally, incorporation of TC relocation within the cycling systems further improved the mean 3DVAR-initialized forecasts but the average hybrid-initialized forecasts were nearly unchanged.

scholarly journals Application of WRF 3DVAR to Operational Typhoon Prediction in Taiwan: Impact of Outer Loop and Partial Cycling Approaches

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1249-1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling-Feng Hsiao ◽  
Der-Song Chen ◽  
Ying-Hwa Kuo ◽  
Yong-Run Guo ◽  
Tien-Chiang Yeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
North Pacific Ocean ◽  
Limited Area ◽  
Track Forecast ◽  
Forecast Errors ◽  
Outer Loop ◽  
Typhoon Track ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Data Assimilation System ◽  
Assimilation System

Abstract In this paper, the impact of outer loop and partial cycling with the Weather Research and Forecasting Model’s (WRF) three-dimensional variational data assimilation system (3DVAR) is evaluated by analyzing 78 forecasts for three typhoons during 2008 for which Taiwan’s Central Weather Bureau (CWB) issued typhoon warnings, including Sinlaku, Hagupit, and Jangmi. The use of both the outer loop and the partial cycling approaches in WRF 3DVAR are found to reduce typhoon track forecast errors by more than 30%, averaged over a 72-h period. The improvement due to the outer loop approach, which can be more than 42%, was particularly significant in the early phase of the forecast. The use of the outer loop allows more observations to be assimilated and produces more accurate analyses. The assimilation of additional nonlinear GPS radio occultation (RO) observations over the western North Pacific Ocean, where traditional observational data are lacking, is particularly useful. With the lack of observations over the tropical and subtropical oceans, the error in the first-guess field (which is based on a 6-h forecast of the previous cycle) will continue to grow in a full-cycling limited-area data assimilation system. Even though the use of partial cycling only shows a slight improvement in typhoon track forecast after 12 h, it has the benefit of suppressing the growth of the systematic model error. A typhoon prediction model using the Advanced Research core of the WRF (WRF-ARW) and the WRF 3DVAR system with outer loop and partial cycling substantially improves the typhoon track forecast. This system, known as Typhoon WRF (TWRF), has been in use by CWB since 2010 for operational typhoon predictions.

scholarly journals An OSSE-Based Evaluation of Hybrid Variational–Ensemble Data Assimilation for the NCEP GFS. Part I: System Description and 3D-Hybrid Results

2015 ◽  
Vol 143 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daryl T. Kleist ◽  
Kayo Ide
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Variational Data Assimilation ◽  
Forecast Errors ◽  
Weather Forecasts ◽  
Global Data Assimilation System ◽  
Analysis Error ◽  
Environmental Prediction ◽  
The Impact

Abstract An observing system simulation experiment (OSSE) has been carried out to evaluate the impact of a hybrid ensemble–variational data assimilation algorithm for use with the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) global data assimilation system. An OSSE provides a controlled framework for evaluating analysis and forecast errors since a truth is known. In this case, the nature run was generated and provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts as part of the international Joint OSSE project. The assimilation and forecast impact studies are carried out using a model that is different than the nature run model, thereby accounting for model error and avoiding issues with the so-called identical-twin experiments. It is found that the quality of analysis is improved substantially when going from three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVar) to a hybrid 3D ensemble–variational (EnVar)-based algorithm. This is especially true in terms of the analysis error reduction for wind and moisture, most notably in the tropics. Forecast impact experiments show that the hybrid-initialized forecasts improve upon the 3DVar-based forecasts for most metrics, lead times, variables, and levels. An additional experiment that utilizes 3DEnVar (100% ensemble) demonstrates that the use of a 25% static error covariance contribution does not alter the quality of hybrid analysis when utilizing the tangent-linear normal mode constraint on the total hybrid increment.

scholarly journals A radar reflectivity operator with ice-phase hydrometeors for variational data assimilation (version 1.0) and its evaluation with real radar data

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 4031-4051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shizhang Wang ◽  
Zhiquan Liu
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Variational Data Assimilation ◽  
Radar Reflectivity ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Background Fields ◽  
Ice Phase

Abstract. A reflectivity forward operator and its associated tangent linear and adjoint operators (together named RadarVar) were developed for variational data assimilation (DA). RadarVar can analyze both rainwater and ice-phase species (snow and graupel) by directly assimilating radar reflectivity observations. The results of three-dimensional variational (3D-Var) DA experiments with a 3 km grid mesh setting of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model showed that RadarVar was effective at producing an analysis of reflectivity pattern and intensity similar to the observed data. Two to three outer loops with 50–100 iterations in each loop were needed to obtain a converged 3-D analysis of reflectivity, rainwater, snow, and graupel, including the melting layers with mixed-phase hydrometeors. It is shown that the deficiencies in the analysis using this operator, caused by the poor quality of the background fields and the use of the static background error covariance, can be partially resolved by using radar-retrieved hydrometeors in a preprocessing step and tuning the spatial correlation length scales of the background errors. The direct radar reflectivity assimilation using RadarVar also improved the short-term (2–5 h) precipitation forecasts compared to those of the experiment without DA.

Intercomparison and Coupling of Ensemble and Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation Methods for the Analysis and Forecasting of Hurricane Karl (2010)

2014 ◽  
Vol 142 (9) ◽  
pp. 3347-3364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Poterjoy ◽  
Fuqing Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Cyclone ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Hybrid System ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Variational Data Assimilation ◽  
Weather Research And Forecasting ◽  
Forecast Errors ◽  
Verification Methods

This study examines the performance of ensemble and variational data assimilation systems for the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. These methods include an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), an incremental four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVar) system, and a hybrid system that uses a two-way coupling between the two approaches (E4DVar). The three methods are applied to assimilate routinely collected data and field observations over a 10-day period that spans the life cycle of Hurricane Karl (2010), including the pregenesis disturbance that preceded its development into a tropical cyclone. In general, forecasts from the E4DVar analyses are found to produce smaller 48–72-h forecast errors than the benchmark EnKF and 4DVar methods for all variables and verification methods tested in this study. The improved representation of low- and midlevel moisture and vorticity in the E4DVar analyses leads to more accurate track and intensity predictions by this system. In particular, E4DVar analyses provide persistently more skillful genesis and rapid intensification forecasts than the EnKF and 4DVar methods during cycling. The data assimilation experiments also expose additional benefits of the hybrid system in terms of physical balance, computational cost, and the treatment of asynoptic observations near the beginning of the assimilation window. These factors make it a practical data assimilation method for mesoscale analysis and forecasting, and for tropical cyclone prediction.

scholarly journals E3DVar: Coupling an Ensemble Kalman Filter with Three-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation in a Limited-Area Weather Prediction Model and Comparison to E4DVar

2013 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
pp. 900-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuqing Zhang ◽  
Meng Zhang ◽  
Jonathan Poterjoy
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Variational Data Assimilation ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Limited Area ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Mean Square Errors

Abstract This study examines the performance of a hybrid ensemble-variational data assimilation system (E3DVar) that couples an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) with the three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVar) system for the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. The performance of E3DVar and the component EnKF and 3DVar systems are compared over the eastern United States for June 2003. Conventional sounding and surface observations as well as data from wind profilers, aircraft and ships, and cloud-tracked winds from satellites, are assimilated every 6 h during the experiments, and forecasts are verified using standard sounding observations. Forecasts with 12- to 72-h lead times are found to have noticeably smaller root-mean-square errors when initialized with the E3DVar system, as opposed to the EnKF, especially for the 12-h wind and moisture fields. The E3DVar system demonstrates similar performance as an EnKF, while using less than half the number of ensemble members, and is less sensitive to the use of a multiphysics ensemble to account for model errors. The E3DVar system is also compared with a similar hybrid method that replaces the 3DVar component with the WRF four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVar) method (denoted E4DVar). The E4DVar method demonstrated considerable improvements over E3DVar for nearly all model levels and variables at the shorter forecast lead times (12–48 h), but the forecast accuracies of all three ensemble-based methods (EnKF, E3DVar, and E4DVar) converge to similar results at longer lead times (60–72 h). Nevertheless, all methods that used ensemble information produced considerably better forecasts than the two methods that relied solely on static background error covariance (i.e., 3DVar and 4DVar).

Three-dimensional variational data assimilation for a limited area model

2001 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Gustafsson ◽  
L. Berre ◽  
S. Hörnquist ◽  
X.-Y. Huang ◽  
M. Lindskog ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Variational Data Assimilation ◽  
Limited Area ◽  
Limited Area Model ◽  
Area Model
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document