scholarly journals Langmuir Turbulence and Surface Heating in the Ocean Surface Boundary Layer

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 2897-2911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brodie C. Pearson ◽  
Alan L. M. Grant ◽  
Jeff A. Polton ◽  
Stephen E. Belcher

AbstractThis study uses large-eddy simulation to investigate the structure of the ocean surface boundary layer (OSBL) in the presence of Langmuir turbulence and stabilizing surface heat fluxes. The OSBL consists of a weakly stratified layer, despite a surface heat flux, above a stratified thermocline. The weakly stratified (mixed) layer is maintained by a combination of a turbulent heat flux produced by the wave-driven Stokes drift and downgradient turbulent diffusion. The scaling of turbulence statistics, such as dissipation and vertical velocity variance, is only affected by the surface heat flux through changes in the mixed layer depth. Diagnostic models are proposed for the equilibrium boundary layer and mixed layer depths in the presence of surface heating. The models are a function of the initial mixed layer depth before heating is imposed and the Langmuir stability length. In the presence of radiative heating, the models are extended to account for the depth profile of the heating.

2004 ◽  
Vol 61 (21) ◽  
pp. 2528-2543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn M. Auslander ◽  
Peter R. Bannon

Abstract This study examines the diurnal response of a mixed-layer model of the dryline system to localized anomalies of surface heat flux, topography, mixed-layer depth, and inversion strength. The two-dimensional, mixed-layer model is used to simulate the dynamics of a cool, moist layer east of the dryline capped by an inversion under synoptically quiescent conditions. The modeled domain simulates the sloping topography of the U.S. Great Plains. The importance of this study can be related to dryline bulges that are areas with enhanced convergence that may trigger convection in suitable environmental conditions. All anomalies are represented by a Gaussian function in the horizontal whose amplitude, size, and orientation can be altered. A positive, surface-heat-flux anomaly produces increased mixing that creates a bulge toward the east, while a negative anomaly produces a westward bulge. Anomalies in topography show a similar trend in bulge direction with a peak giving an eastward bulge, and a valley giving a westward bulge. Anomalies in the initial mixed-layer depth yield an eastward bulge in the presence of a minimum and a westward bulge for a maximum. An anomaly in the initial inversion strength results in a westward bulge when the inversion is stronger, and an eastward bulge when the inversion is weak. The bulges observed in this study at 1800 LT ranged from 400 to 600 km along the dryline and from 25 to 80 km across the dryline. When the heating ceases at night, the entrainment and eastward movement of the line stops, and the line surges westward. This westward surge at night has little dependence on the type of anomaly applied. Whether a westward or eastward bulge was present at 1800 LT, the surge travels an equal distance toward the west. However, the inclusion of weak nocturnal friction reduces the westward surge by 100 to 200 km due to mechanical mixing of the very shallow leading edge of the surge. All model runs exhibit peaks in the mixed-layer depth along the dryline at 1800 LT caused by enhanced boundary layer convergence and entrainment of elevated mixed-layer air into the mixed layer. These peaks appear along the section of the dryline that is least parallel to the southerly flow. They vary in amplitude from 4 to 9 km depending on the amplitude of the anomaly. However, the surface-heat-flux anomalies generally result in peaks at the higher end of this interval. It is hypothesized that the formation of these peaks may be the trigger for deep convection along the dryline in the late afternoon.


2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shun Ohishi ◽  
Hidenori Aiki ◽  
Tomoki Tozuka ◽  
Meghan F. Cronin

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 1994-2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Chiodi ◽  
D. E. Harrison

Abstract Globally, the seasonal cycle is the largest single component of observed sea surface temperature (SST) variability, yet it is still not fully understood. Herein, the degree to which the structure of the seasonal cycle of Southern Hemisphere SST can be explained by the present understanding of surface fluxes and upper-ocean physics is examined. It has long been known that the annual range of Southern Hemisphere SST is largest in the midlatitudes, despite the fact that the annual range of net surface heat flux peaks well poleward of the SST peak. The reasons for this discrepancy (“falloff of the annual range of SST”) are determined here through analysis of net surface heat flux estimates, observed SST, and mixed layer depth data, and results from experiments using two different one-dimensional ocean models. Results show that (i) the classical explanations for the structure of the annual range of SST in the Southern Hemisphere are incomplete, (ii) current estimates of surface heat flux and mixed layer depth can be used to accurately reproduce the observed annual range of SST, and (iii) the prognostic mixed layer models used here often fail to adequately reproduce the seasonal cycle at higher latitudes, despite performing remarkably well in other regions. This suggests that more work is necessary to understand the changes of upper-ocean dynamics that occur with latitude.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 3511-3531
Author(s):  
Ayako Yamamoto ◽  
Hiroaki Tatebe ◽  
Masami Nonaka

AbstractDespite its wide-ranging potential impacts, the exact cause of the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation/variability (AMO/AMV) is far from settled. While the emergence of the AMO sea surface temperature (SST) pattern has been conventionally attributed to the ocean heat transport, a recent study showed that the atmospheric stochastic forcing is sufficient. In this study, we resolve this conundrum by partitioning the multidecadal SST tendency into a part caused by surface heat fluxes and another by ocean dynamics, using a preindustrial control simulation of a state-of-the-art coupled climate model. In the model, horizontal ocean heat advection primarily acts to warm the subpolar SST as in previous studies; however, when the vertical component is also considered, the ocean dynamics overall acts to cool the region. Alternatively, the heat flux term is primarily responsible for the subpolar North Atlantic SST warming, although the associated surface heat flux anomalies are upward as observed. Further decomposition of the heat flux term reveals that it is the mixed layer depth (MLD) deepening that makes the ocean less susceptible for cooling, thus leading to relative warming by increasing the ocean heat capacity. This role of the MLD variability in the AMO signature had not been addressed in previous studies. The MLD variability is primarily induced by the anomalous salinity transport by the Gulf Stream modulated by the multidecadal North Atlantic Oscillation, with turbulent fluxes playing a secondary role. Thus, depending on how we interpret the MLD variability, our results support the two previously suggested frameworks, yet slightly modifying the previous notions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-462
Author(s):  
Brodie C. Pearson ◽  
Alan L. M. Grant ◽  
Jeff A. Polton ◽  
Stephen E. Belcher

AbstractThe differences between the conclusions of Noh and Choi and of Pearson et al., which are largely a result of defining different length scales based on different quantities, are discussed. This study shows that the layer over which Langmuir turbulence mixes (nominally hTKE) under a stabilizing surface buoyancy flux should be scaled by a combination of the Langmuir stability length LL and initial/nocturnal boundary layer depth h0 rather than by the Zilitinkevich length.


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 1769-1787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Ushijima ◽  
Yutaka Yoshikawa

AbstractIn the present study, large-eddy simulations (LESs) were performed to investigate mixed layer depth (MLD) and sea surface warming (SSW) under diurnally cycling surface heat flux in the heating season, in which a mixed layer (ML) is shoaling on intraseasonal time scales. The LES results showed that the diurnal cycle makes the MLD greater (smaller) at lower (higher) latitudes than the MLD without the cycle. Time scales of the wind-induced shear and the surface heat are a key to understand this latitudinal dependence of the diurnal cycle effects. The wind-induced shear-driven turbulence developed from early morning and became strongest at half the inertial period (Ti/2), while nighttime cooling weakened the ML stratification until the end of the nighttime (T24 = 24 h). At lower latitudes where Ti/2 > T24 (lower than 15°), the shear-driven turbulence continued to grow after T24 and determined the time of the greatest MLD. Thus, the shear-driven turbulence shaped the latitudinal dependence of the MLD, though convective turbulence helped further deepening of the ML. At higher latitudes (Ti/2 < T24), on the other hand, the shear-driven turbulence ceased growing before the nighttime cooling ended. However, reduced stratification due to the nighttime cooling supported the shear-driven turbulence to continue deepening the ML. Thus, the nighttime cooling shaped the latitudinal dependence of the MLD at higher latitudes. The MLD change induced by the diurnal cycle altered the SSW rate. At higher latitudes, the diurnal cycle is expected to reduce the MLD and increase the SSW by 10% in the heating season.


2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen E. Belcher ◽  
Alan L. M. Grant ◽  
Kirsty E. Hanley ◽  
Baylor Fox-Kemper ◽  
Luke Van Roekel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document