Focus on Mental Health Care Reforms in Europe: A One-Day Census of Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Facilities in Italy: Findings From the PROGRES-Acute Project

2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 722-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Gaddini ◽  
Lilia Biscaglia ◽  
Renata Bracco ◽  
Giovanni de Girolamo ◽  
Rossella Miglio ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 727-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J Spittal ◽  
Fiona Shand ◽  
Helen Christensen ◽  
Lisa Brophy ◽  
Jane Pirkis

Objective: Presentation to hospital after self-harm is an opportunity to treat underlying mental health problems. We aimed to describe the pattern of mental health contacts following hospital admission focusing on those with and without recent contact with community mental health services (connected and unconnected patients). Methods: We undertook a data linkage study of all individuals admitted as a general or psychiatric inpatient to hospital after self-harm in New South Wales, Australia, between 2005 and 2011. We identified the proportion of admissions where the patient received subsequent in-person community mental health care within 30 days of discharge and the factors associated with receipt of that care. Results: A total of 42,353 individuals were admitted to hospital for self-harm. In 41% of admissions, the patient had contact with a community mental health service after discharge. Patients connected with community mental health services had 5.33 (95% confidence interval = [5.09, 5.59]) times higher odds of follow-up care than unconnected patients. Other factors, such as increasing age and treatment as a psychiatric inpatient, were associated with lower odds of follow-up community care. Conclusion: Our study suggests that full advantage is not being taken of the opportunity to provide comprehensive mental health care for people who self-harm once they have been discharged from the inpatient setting. This is particularly the case for those who have not previously received community mental health care. There appears to be scope for system-level improvement in the way in which those who are treated for self-harm are followed up in the community.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 1129-1136
Author(s):  
Kelly Carlson ◽  
Jeanette Kingsley ◽  
Caroline Strimaitis ◽  
Shira Birnbaum ◽  
Theresa Quinn ◽  
...  

Nature-based therapies have a long history in mental health care. Beneficial effects have been documented for nature-based therapies in a variety of other health care settings. The aims of this grounded theory study were to understand the processes of maintaining nature-based therapeutic groups and the value of the activities to patients in a psychiatric inpatient setting. Over a nine-month period, semi-structured surveys of patient responses to nature-based activities were administered to patients in a pilot therapy group assessing the feasibility of a nature-based group program. Findings indicated that the group promoted use of the senses, social interaction, and care of self/others. Perceptions of benefits led to a nuanced understanding of the effects of being in contact with nature. Based on our findings we offer a preliminary theoretical model for patient engagement with nature-based programming in inpatient mental health care.


2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-144
Author(s):  
Mark Leys

This article discusses mental health care reforms in Belgium from an interorganisational perspective. In 2007 a three year experiential government programme was launched seeking for alternative organisation models in mental health care, labeled as 'care circuits' and 'networks'. The target population is 'persons with chronic and complex mental disorders'. This article reports some of the observations based of an ongoing evaluation process. The research evaluates the plan and implementation processes of these collaboration and networking models (the TP). The qualitative approach aims at developing, testing and refining insights in the dynamics of developing collaboration and networks by exploring the complex and dynamic interaction among context, mechanism, and outcome. The article uses insights form health care innovation literature, interorganisational network theories and literature on organisational fields. Health care innovations take place in a complex multi-agent environment. The implementation (adopting and sustaining) of health services innovations is influenced both by 'external' and 'internal' processes and barriers. The public sector context of mental health care includes 'external' influences by multiple stakeholder through values, power plays, regulations and normative frameworks. The development of interprofessional collaboration and interorganisational networks develops thus in an organisational field. An organisational field is complex, heterogeneous, multi-layered and dynamic. Organisations and actors in the field act on the basis of their interests and respond strategically to institutional pressures. Fields also shape the discourse, norms and structures in ways that match their individual interests and objectives. We found plenty of indications in the mental health reform programme. But the research also urges to develop that further insights into the question whether and under what conditions networks and collaborations between different types of organisations actually are effective. The issue of network governance should be elaborated upon.


2017 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-50
Author(s):  
Rachel Loebach ◽  
Sasha Ayoubzadeh

Mental illness is a prevalent and costly health care issue. Lengthy wait times for psychiatric services in Ontario are a barrier to adequate mental health care for adults, children and youth. The objective of this paper is to highlight the current state of psychiatric wait times in Ontario by looking at provincial policies and comparing data to physical health services, as well as between provinces and other developed nations. The Ontario government has successfully implemented mandatory reporting of wait-time data for many medical and surgical services. However, such policies have yet to be implemented for psychiatric services. As a result, availability of current data for comparison is limited. Nova Scotia is currently the only province to government mandate reporting of wait times for mental health. Furthermore, The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ranks Canada below average on measures related to accessibility of psychiatric inpatient services compared to other developed nations. While Ontario has implemented new initiatives to address the issue of timely mental health care, there is still insufficient evidence to determine if they are effective. Continued advocacy for mandatory wait-time reporting at the provincial level and further analysis of current initiatives worldwide are essential steps toward reducing wait times.


2010 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Jenkins ◽  
David McDaid ◽  
Alexey Nikiforov ◽  
Angelina Potasheva ◽  
Jonathan Watkins ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document