Innovations and networks: the case of mental health care reforms in Belgium

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-144
Author(s):  
Mark Leys

This article discusses mental health care reforms in Belgium from an interorganisational perspective. In 2007 a three year experiential government programme was launched seeking for alternative organisation models in mental health care, labeled as 'care circuits' and 'networks'. The target population is 'persons with chronic and complex mental disorders'. This article reports some of the observations based of an ongoing evaluation process. The research evaluates the plan and implementation processes of these collaboration and networking models (the TP). The qualitative approach aims at developing, testing and refining insights in the dynamics of developing collaboration and networks by exploring the complex and dynamic interaction among context, mechanism, and outcome. The article uses insights form health care innovation literature, interorganisational network theories and literature on organisational fields. Health care innovations take place in a complex multi-agent environment. The implementation (adopting and sustaining) of health services innovations is influenced both by 'external' and 'internal' processes and barriers. The public sector context of mental health care includes 'external' influences by multiple stakeholder through values, power plays, regulations and normative frameworks. The development of interprofessional collaboration and interorganisational networks develops thus in an organisational field. An organisational field is complex, heterogeneous, multi-layered and dynamic. Organisations and actors in the field act on the basis of their interests and respond strategically to institutional pressures. Fields also shape the discourse, norms and structures in ways that match their individual interests and objectives. We found plenty of indications in the mental health reform programme. But the research also urges to develop that further insights into the question whether and under what conditions networks and collaborations between different types of organisations actually are effective. The issue of network governance should be elaborated upon.

Author(s):  
Jill Thistlethwaite ◽  
Wendy Hawksworth

This chapter explores the concept and practice of teamwork and interprofessional collaboration in the support and treatment of clients with mental health problems. Mental health care provision is complex, ethically challenging, and frequently delivered via mental health care teams (MHCT) in both primary and secondary health care settings. We consider how such teams may work together optimally using values-based and client-centered approaches. We discuss the nature of and reasons for conflict arising in multidisciplinary MHCTs, focusing on ethical dilemmas that occur where there is diversity amongst team members in respect of personal, professional, and/or organizational values. The specific ethical issues discussed are: boundary issues; receiving gifts; confidentiality, and involuntary treatment and restraint. Three case studies are used to provide examples of values in action.


10.17816/cp44 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-46
Author(s):  
Sebastian Rosenberg ◽  
Carol Harvey

Australia was one of the first countries to develop and implement a national mental health plan, 30 years ago. This national approach belied the countrys federal structure, in which the federal government takes responsibility for primary care while state and territory governments manage acute and hospital mental health care. This arrangement has led to significant variations across jurisdictions. It has also left secondary care, often provided in the community, outside of this governance arrangement. This article explores this dilemma and its implications for community mental health, and suggests key steps towards more effective reform of this vital element of mental health care.


2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOAN COSTA-FONT ◽  
LUIS SALVADOR-CARULLA ◽  
JUAN M. CABASES ◽  
JORDI ALONSO ◽  
DAVID McDAID

AbstractA system of devolved welfare governance, it is argued, increases participation in welfare services. However, limited empirical evidence has been reported on how it influences welfare reform. This paper draws upon evidence from the mental health system in Spain, where health care is devolved to the regional states (autonomous communities), to examine whether policy reform of neglected policy areas may be triggered through heightened policy awareness and better participation of interested stakeholders. We find that regional devolution has helped to scale up mental health in some of Spain's autonomous regions relative to support for other services. Evidence suggests that whilst fragmentation and certain historical legacies remain path dependent, regional devolution has indeed enhanced experimentation, reform and policy innovation in mental health care. However, the expansion of mental health care coverage has been constrained by the lack of a clear definition of public coverage, as well as the need to meet the demands of evidence-based policy in an era of cost-containment. Inequalities in access to mental health care remain; they are compounded by the stigma and discrimination experienced by people with mental health problems, which is a common challenge for all health systems in Europe.


2010 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Jenkins ◽  
David McDaid ◽  
Alexey Nikiforov ◽  
Angelina Potasheva ◽  
Jonathan Watkins ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 54-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Fassaert ◽  
M. Segeren ◽  
C. Grimbergen ◽  
W. Tuinebreijer ◽  
M. de Wit

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document