Is Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Safe?

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (12) ◽  
pp. 1186-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyson L. Waterman ◽  
Stephen R. Grobmyer ◽  
William G. Cance ◽  
Steven N. Hochwald

Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) commonly present as an incidental finding on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Advances in endoscopic technology have allowed some to perform attempted excision of these lesions endoscopically. The oncologic implications of such an approach remain unclear. A-74-year-old man initially presented with an incidental finding of a 1.6 x 1.8-cm c-kit-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumor with low mitotic activity in the gastric fundus. The patient underwent an attempted endoscopic resection of this mass resulting in incomplete excision and gastric perforation. There was immediate conversion to a celiotomy and the patient underwent partial gastrectomy; there was no evidence of metastatic GIST. Three years later, the patient was noted to have an asymptomatic large pelvic mass (4 x 7 cm) on CT scan and was referred for evaluation. Subsequent surgical exploration revealed a single mass adherent to the pelvic sidewall that was resected. Subsequent pathology demonstrated a c-kit-positive GIST consistent with metastatic disease. Eighteen months later, the patient remains free of disease. Complications from endoscopic resection of gastric GIST may be associated with peritoneal dissemination of disease. This should be considered when formulating a strategy for management of gastric GIST. Complete transperitoneal excision (either open or laparoscopic) with clear margins and without tumor rupture remains the gold standard for management of gastric GIST.

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (8) ◽  
pp. 719-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Winfield ◽  
Steven N. Hochwald ◽  
Stephen B. Vogel ◽  
Alan W. Hemming ◽  
Chen Liu ◽  
...  

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) have been described primarily in isolated case reports. In order to learn more about duodenal GIST, a retrospective review of patients with GIST managed at a single institution between 2000 and 2005 was conducted. Thirty-eight GIST of the stomach and small bowel were analyzed. Eight (21%) were duodenal GIST. The median size of duodenal GIST (6.0 cm) and small bowel GIST (6.3 cm) was larger than the median size of gastric GIST (3.0 cm). The most common presentation of duodenal GIST was bleeding (50%) which was similar to other small bowel GIST (49%) but different from gastric GIST which were most commonly an incidental finding (62%). Two patients (25%) with duodenal GIST had a history of neurofibromatosis. The duodenal GIST were located in the 2nd (n = 5, 63%) and 3rd portion of duodenum (n = 3, 37%). Seven of 8 patients underwent complete resection of duodenal GIST. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was the most common operation performed (n = 5); 2 patients were treated with partial duodenal resection. No patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 5) were found to have lymph node metastases. No patients received neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapy with Imatinib. Following resection, 2 patients have recurred (12 and 48 mo.), 4 patients are without disease (1, 6, 6, and 24 mo.), 1 patient died postoperatively. Duodenal GIST are relatively rare tumors that present most commonly with gastrointestinal bleeding. Duodenal GIST are associated with neurofibromatosis. Many duodenal GIST require pancreaticoduodenectomy for complete removal.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 441-446
Author(s):  
Emma C. Gertsen ◽  
Gijs I. van Boxel ◽  
Lodewijk A.A. Brosens ◽  
Jelle P. Ruurda ◽  
Richard van Hillegersberg

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) frequently present as a large exophytically growing mass in the stomach, for which open partial gastrectomy is standard of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive gastric resection (MIG) of large (&#x3e;5 cm) GIST. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> All patients who underwent MIG for a GIST in the University Medical Center Utrecht between 2011 and 2019 were included. Postoperative course and oncological outcomes were analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-two patients with gastric GIST, median size 53 mm [20–175 mm], underwent MIG. In 4 patients, preoperative imatinib was given, aiming for tumor regression. Conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery occurred once (5%). An additional resection was performed in 3 patients (14%). In 2 patients (9%), an intraoperative complication occurred, consisting of tumor rupture in 1 patient (5%), and 6 patients (27%) developed postoperative complications. Median hospital stay was 5 days [3–7 days]. R0 resection was achieved in 96%. In 4 patients, adjuvant treatment was indicated. The median follow-up was 31 months, and 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival were 94, 74 and 74%, respectively. One patient presented with local recurrence 2 years after the index resection. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> MIG for large GIST up to 17.5 cm in diameter is safe, feasible, and oncologically sound, allowing for a controlled resection and reduced patient morbidity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 115-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuyong Tan ◽  
Linna Tan ◽  
Jiaxi Lu ◽  
Jirong Huo ◽  
Deliang Liu

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cicilia Marcella ◽  
Rui Hua Shi ◽  
Shakeel Sarwar

Aims. To review the clinical presentation, diagnosis, assessment of risk of malignancy, and recent advances in management (mainly focusing on the role of endoscopic resection) of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in upper GI.Method. We searched Embase, Web of science, and PubMed databases from 1993 to 2018 by using the following keywords: “gastrointestinal stromal tumors,” “GIST,” “treatment,” and “diagnosis.” Additional papers were searched manually from references of the related articles.Findings. The improvement of endoscopic techniques in treating upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors especially gastrointestinal tumors has reduced the need for invasive surgery in patients unfit for surgery. Many studies have concluded that modified endoscopic treatments are effective and safe. These treatments permit minimal tissue resection, better dissection control, and high rates of en bloc resection with an acceptable rate of complications.


2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. S-727
Author(s):  
Mi-Young Kim ◽  
Kee Don Choi ◽  
Jeong Hoon Lee ◽  
Hye-won Park ◽  
Do Hoon Kim ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (08) ◽  
pp. E950-E956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiyi Song ◽  
Wei Ren ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Shu Zhang ◽  
Song Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. Up to the present time, complete surgical excision has been the standard treatment for primary GISTs greater than 2 cm. It is well known that tumor rupture during surgery is an independent risk factor for peritoneal metastasis; however, it is not known whether the risk of peritoneal metastasis increases in cases where the tumor is ruptured during endoscopic resection. Patients and methods A total of 195 patients treated for GIST between January 2014 and December 2016 in our hospital were enrolled in this study. They were divided into two groups according to whether the tumor was ruptured during endoscopic resection. The rate of peritoneal metastasis in patients in the two groups who also suffered perforation was investigated from the follow-up results. Results Approximately 55.4 % of all patients were female and the average age of the study group was 59.0 ± 10.3 years. Of the 195 patients, the tumors in 27 were ruptured and the remaining 168 patients underwent en bloc resection. There was no statistically significant difference in gender or age between the two groups. The median tumor size (maximum diameter) in all patients was 1.5 cm (0.3 – 5.0 cm): 2.5 cm (0.8 – 5.0 cm) and 1.4 cm (0.3 – 4.0 cm) in the tumor rupture group and en bloc resection group, respectively (P < 0.001). Most of the tumors were located in the gastric fundus. At a median follow-up of 18.7 ± 10.2 months, neither tumor recurrence (liver metastasis, peritoneal metastasis, local recurrence) nor mortality related to GISTs were detected. Conclusions Tumor rupture during endoscopic resection of gastric GISTs may not be a risk factor for peritoneal metastasis.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian fang Rong ◽  
Si hai Chen ◽  
Cong hua Song ◽  
Huan Wang ◽  
Qiao yun Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach are the most common GISTs. The risk, incidence and outcome of cancer are different between the sexes. Whether gender is related to the prognosis of gastric stromal tumors is unclear. Therefore, this study aims to explore the relationship between gender and gastric GIST prognosis. Methods Data from gastric GIST patients were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. After propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce confounding factors, the clinicopathological features and prognosis of GIST patients were comprehensively evaluated. Results There were 512 male patients and 538 female patients with gastric GIST. The gender of gastric GIST patients was associated with marital status, surgical treatment, tumor size, and mitotic index (P < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test revealed that male patients had a higher mortality rate than female patients (P = 0.0024). After matching all the potential confounding factors, the survival of the female gastric GIST patients was better than that of the male gastric GIST patients (P = 0.042). Cox regression analysis revealed that gender was an independent risk factor for overall survival. The risk of death was higher for males than for females (HR: 1.539, 95% CI: 1.066–2.222, P = 0.021). Conclusion Gender could be a prognostic factor for gastric GIST survival, and male patients had a higher risk of death.


2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB256-AB257
Author(s):  
Amaninder J. Dhaliwal ◽  
Harmeet S. Mashiana ◽  
Ajay Pal Singh ◽  
Banreet S. Dhindsa ◽  
Aravdeep Jhand ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document