Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Combined Analysis of Resident and Attending Learning Curves at a Single Institution

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-124
Author(s):  
Mark Joseph ◽  
Michael Phillips ◽  
Christopher C. Rupp

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is a recent technical modification on standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy that has been shown to be safe and feasible. Recent studies suggest that experienced laparoscopic surgeons have a short learning curve to become proficient in SILC. However, little is known about the interaction of the learning curves of residents and attending surgeons at academic programs. We prospectively evaluated various metrics of both attending and resident surgeons as they progressed in their experience with SILC. Patients were placed into cohorts of 25 based on teaching surgeon experience. Data recorded included patient-specific and operative variables along with complications, conversion to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and outcomes. One hundred one patients underwent SILC. Twelve per cent of patients required conversion to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. No significant difference was found in operative times compared within the experience-based cohorts ( P = 0.21). A reduction in operative time was shown in residents who were proficient in standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) along their learning curve. Operative times remained the same for the teaching surgeon regardless of experience of resident surgeon. SILC has a short learning curve for resident surgeons who are proficient in standard laparoscopic surgery. SILC can be effectively taught with few complications and outcomes similar to SLC with preservation of operative efficiency and safety. Further studies are warranted, however, at a national/international level to define the place and use for SILC as well as the incorporation of single-incision techniques into resident curriculum.

Author(s):  
Kirti Savyasacchi Goyal ◽  
Maneshwar Singh Utaal ◽  
Pramod Kumar Bhatia

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has evolved to be as gold standard treatment for gall bladder disease and is the most common laparoscopic procedure performed worldwide. In recent times, the innovative techniques of Natural orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) have been applied as a step forward towards scar less surgery with added benefits of less pain and less analgesic requirement, shorter hospital stay, quick return to work.Methods: A retrospective study of 50 patients admitted with gall bladder disease through outdoor for laparoscopic cholecystectomy from November 2018 to January 2019 in Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Mullana (AMBALA) were randomized into two groups of  25 each for Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) comparing the operative time, outcome and  complications.Results: 50 patients admitted to MMIMSR Mullana from November 2018 to January 2019 with gall bladder disease were divided into two groups of 25 each who underwent three port SILC and four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC). The average intra-operative time in SILC (80.56 mins) was significantly more than standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The average length of stay in the hospital for SILC was 1.8 days (1-3 days), was significantly less than in standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Incidence of Intraoperative complications were more in SILC than standard LC.Conclusions: SILC as the newer novel technique had better outcomes in terms of cosmesis, early discharge, shorter stay at hospital.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elyssa J. Feinberg ◽  
Emmanuel Agaba ◽  
Michelle L. Feinberg ◽  
Diego Camacho ◽  
Pratibha Vemulapalli

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (179) ◽  
Author(s):  
P B Thapa ◽  
DK Maharjan ◽  
DR Singh

INTRODUCTION: Use of laparoscopic surgery has demanded principles of less trauma of access hence less scar and so probably less complications. Hence conventional laparoscopic surgeries were tried with natural orifice transluminal surgery (NOTES) and then single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). With refinement in instruments and surgeons skills SILS have bridged up between conventional and NOTES in order to quench the desire of less or no scar at all. METHODS: Comparative case control study between conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and SILS in public teaching hospital. RESULTS: Total 20 patients underwent SILS cholecystectomy and 20 underwent conventional cholecystectomy and found that no difference between both in terms of post operative pain score, hospital stay and post operative wound infection except significant difference in mean operative time and patient's level of satisfaction was less in patient with SILC if were subjected to pay for instruments in order to maintain cosmesis. CONCLUSIONS: Though SILS have gained rapid acceptance in surgical fraternity, large number of randomized controlled trials are necessary to show its benefit over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Keywords: cholecystectomy, conventional, laparoscopy, single incision, surgery


2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (9) ◽  
pp. 839-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra M. Farach ◽  
Paul D. Danielson ◽  
Ernest K. Amankwah ◽  
Nicole M. Chandler

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has been shown to be safe in children; however, factors that impact outcomes are not well understood. We report a retrospective review of 151 patients who underwent SILC between 2009 and 2013. Regression analysis was used to determine inflection of learning curve. Patients were grouped by early cases, late cases, and late case with surgical trainees. Mean age for all patients was 15 ± 3 years (5–20.5 year), and mean weight was 66.5 ± 21.3 kg (15–117 kg). There was a decrease in operative times between the early group (n = 15) and the late group (n = 100) (75.3 vs 56.1 minutes, P < 0.05). Surgical trainees were involved in 36 cases, and their introduction did not significantly increase operative times (56.1 vs 60.4 minutes, P = NS (Non-significant)). No difference in operative times between early cases and cases with trainees was identified (75.3 vs 60.4 minutes, P = NS). The complication was 6 per cent, with no significant differences between the groups. There were five conversions (3.3%). During the adoption of SILC, significantly decreased operative times were achieved after a short learning curve, and these were maintained with surgical trainees. Our results show that SILC can be safely introduced into a pediatric surgical practice.


2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 703-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Carr ◽  
Avinash Bhavaraju ◽  
John Goza ◽  
Russell Wilson

Single-incision laparoscopic surgical procedures are being developed with the goal of improving cosmesis, reducing postoperative pain, and increasing patient satisfaction. We performed this study to evaluate our initial experience with single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We used an infraumbilical incision with two upper low-profile 5-mm ports and one lower standard 5-mm port and either a standard 30° Storz laparoscope or an Olympus deflectable tip laparoscope. All patients were followed postoperatively to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of the procedure. A total of 60 gallbladders were successfully removed by this method (95.2% success rate). Three cases were converted to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4.8% conversion rate) with no conversion to open cholecystectomy. There were no major complications (bile duct injury, liver injury, bowel injury, biliary leak). Median operative time was 51 ± 21 minutes. Diagnoses included cholelithiasis (55%), biliary dyskinesia (32%), biliary colic (13%), and one case of gangrenous cholecystitis. Median patient age was 47 years with a strong female predominance (87%). Our initial experience demonstrates that single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is effective and safe. We are confident that single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a viable alternative to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


Author(s):  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Ashok Kaundal ◽  
Suneet Katoch

AIM: Comparative analysis of post-operative pain between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Method: Patients suffering from symptomatic cholelithasis were randomly subjected to Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional four ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (cLC). Data analyzed included duration of surgery, post-operative pain, For assessment of post-operative pain numeric pain scale scoring system was used and pain scoring done at four hours, twelve hours and twenty-four hours post-operatively. Results: The study included fifty patients operated upon from June, 2014 to May, 2014. Twenty-five patients were subjected to SILC and rest of the twenty-five underwent cLC. Pre-operative characteristics of two groups were similar and there was no significant difference between two groups based on age, sex and Body Mass Index. Post-operative pain score was higher for cLC compared to SILC at four, twelve and twenty-four hours post-operatively. The mean pain score at four hours was 4.64 ± 1.89 for SILC versus 7.72 ± 0.84 for cLC (p-value < 0.0001). While the score at twelve and twenty-four hours were 2.96 ± 1.88 and 1.80 ± 1.44 for SILC compared to 5.08 ± 1.15 and 3.80 ± 1.11 for cLC respectively. Conclusion: SILC is superior to cLC compared to post-operative pain as per our study. Keywords: SILC, cLC, post-operative pain


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document