scholarly journals Incisional Hernia in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 930-936
Author(s):  
Nick Simson ◽  
Parker Samuel ◽  
Thomas Stonier ◽  
Stephen Halligan ◽  
Alastair Windsor

Incisional hernia follows midline laparotomy in 8 to 20 per cent of cases, but the rate following lateral incision is not well documented. This systematic review summarizes incisional hernia rate after open renal transplant. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases from January 2000 to November 2016 inclusive. The outcomes included in our analysis were the posttransplant incisional hernia rate, significant patient risk factors for incisional hernia, the definition of incisional hernia used, the method used to detect incisional hernia, and the incision used for transplantation. Eight retrospective case series were identified, three describing renal transplant recipients and five describing incisional hernia repairs postrenal transplant. All reported the incisional hernia rate postrenal transplant at the host institution. The hernia rate ranged from 1.1 to 7.0 per cent, with a mean of 3.2 per cent. Factors associated with incisional hernia were body mass index >30, age >50, cadaveric graft, and reoperation through the same incision. Despite the significant comorbidity of renal transplant recipients, the incisional hernia rate postrenal transplant is significantly lower than that of post-midline laparotomy. The reasons for this are discussed. This demonstrates the importance of operative technique, local tissue quality and biomechanical factors in the formation of incisional hernia.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 50-61
Author(s):  
Mohsen Ebrahimi ◽  
Alireza Mohebbi ◽  
Mohammad Mostakhdem Hashemi ◽  
Mobina Ashrafi Shahmirzadi ◽  
◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. e010114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Gholamnezhadjafari ◽  
Reza Falak ◽  
Nader Tajik ◽  
Reza Aflatoonian ◽  
Abbas Ali Keshtkar ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
pp. 816-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDUARDO MAZZUCCHI ◽  
WILLIAM CARLOS NAHAS ◽  
IOANNIS ANTONOPOULOS ◽  
LUIS ESTEVAM IANHEZ ◽  
SAMI ARAP

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamidreza Omrani ◽  
Sayed Vahid Jasemi ◽  
Masoud Sadeghi ◽  
Sima Golmohamadi

AIM: The purpose of this meta-analysis was the assessment of the serum IL-6 levels in the renal transplant recipients compared to the healthy controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched up to July 2018 without language restriction. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). A continuous random-effects meta-analysis was used by RevMan 5.3 using the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Also, a regression model was done by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2 (CMA v2). RESULTS: Out of 615 studies identified in the databases, 15 studies included and analysed in the meta-analysis. The studies were reported from 1994 to 2018. The meta-analysis included 1035 renal transplant recipients and 682 healthy controls. The pooled MD of the serum IL-6 levels in the transplant recipients compared to the healthy controls was 3.25 pg/mL [95%CI: 2.17, 4.32; P < 0.00001; I2 = 98% (P < 0.00001)]. Meta-regression analysis showed that one of the reasons of heterogeneity is the year of publication (Correlation coefficient (r) = 0.208, p-value = 0.00002). CONCLUSION: An elevated serum IL-6 level in the renal transplant recipients compared to the healthy controls showed that the serum level of this marker could be used for the evaluation of inflammation in ESRD patients undergoing renal transplantation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document