Monitor Ionizing Radiation-Induced Cellular Responses with Raman Spectroscopy, Non-Negative Matrix Factorization, and Non-Negative Least Squares

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 701-711
Author(s):  
Xinchen Deng ◽  
Ramie Ali-Adeeb ◽  
Jeffrey L. Andrews ◽  
Phillip Shreeves ◽  
Julian J. Lum ◽  
...  

Radiation therapy (RT) is one of the most commonly prescribed cancer treatments. New tools that can accurately monitor and evaluate individual patient responses would be a major advantage and lend to the implementation of personalized treatment plans. In this study, Raman spectroscopy (RS) was applied to examine radiation-induced cellular responses in H460, MCF7, and LNCaP cancer cell lines across different dose levels and times post-irradiation. Previous Raman data analysis was conducted using principal component analysis (PCA), which showed the ability to extract biological information of glycogen. In the current studies, the use of non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) allowed for the discovery of multiplexed biological information, specifically uncovering glycogen-like and lipid-like component bases. The corresponding scores of glycogen and previously unidentified lipids revealed the content variations of these two chemicals in the cellular data. The NMF decomposed glycogen and lipid-like bases were able to separate the cancer cell lines into radiosensitive and radioresistant groups. A further lipid phenotype investigation was also attempted by applying non-negative least squares (NNLS) to the lipid-like bases decomposed individually from three cell lines. Qualitative differences found in lipid weights for each lipid-like basis suggest the lipid phenotype differences in the three tested cancer cell lines. Collectively, this study demonstrates that the application of NMF and NNLS on RS data analysis to monitor ionizing radiation-induced cellular responses can yield multiplexed biological information on bio-response to RT not revealed by conventional chemometric approaches.

Author(s):  
Akram Emdadi ◽  
Changiz Eslahchi

Predicting tumor drug response using cancer cell line drug response values for a large number of anti-cancer drugs is a significant challenge in personalized medicine. Predicting patient response to drugs from data obtained from preclinical models is made easier by the availability of different knowledge on cell lines and drugs. This paper proposes the TCLMF method, a predictive model for predicting drug response in tumor samples that was trained on preclinical samples and is based on the logistic matrix factorization approach. The TCLMF model is designed based on gene expression profiles, tissue type information, the chemical structure of drugs and drug sensitivity (IC 50) data from cancer cell lines. We use preclinical data from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer dataset (GDSC) to train the proposed drug response model, which we then use to predict drug sensitivity of samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. The TCLMF approach focuses on identifying successful features of cell lines and drugs in order to calculate the probability of the tumor samples being sensitive to drugs. The closest cell line neighbours for each tumor sample are calculated using a description of similarity between tumor samples and cell lines in this study. The drug response for a new tumor is then calculated by averaging the low-rank features obtained from its neighboring cell lines. We compare the results of the TCLMF model with the results of the previously proposed methods using two databases and two approaches to test the model’s performance. In the first approach, 12 drugs with enough known clinical drug response, considered in previous methods, are studied. For 7 drugs out of 12, the TCLMF can significantly distinguish between patients that are resistance to these drugs and the patients that are sensitive to them. These approaches are converted to classification models using a threshold in the second approach, and the results are compared. The results demonstrate that the TCLMF method provides accurate predictions across the results of the other algorithms. Finally, we accurately classify tumor tissue type using the latent vectors obtained from TCLMF’s logistic matrix factorization process. These findings demonstrate that the TCLMF approach produces effective latent vectors for tumor samples. The source code of the TCLMF method is available in https://github.com/emdadi/TCLMF.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 457-463
Author(s):  
H. Mozdarani ◽  
O. Azadbakht ◽  
S. Ghorbainan Klachai ◽  
S. Mozdarani ◽  
H. Nosrati ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andrew Jones ◽  
Aviad Tsherniak ◽  
James M. McFarland

AbstractWhile chemical and genetic viability screens in cancer cell lines have identified many promising cancer vulnerabilities, simple univariate readouts of cell proliferation fail to capture the complex cellular responses to perturbations. Complementarily, gene expression profiling offers an information-rich measure of cell state that can provide a more detailed account of cellular responses to perturbations. Relatively little is known, however, about the relationship between transcriptional responses to per-turbations and the long-term cell viability effects of those perturbations. To address this question, we integrated thousands of post-perturbational transcriptional profiles from the Connectivity Map with large-scale screens of cancer cell lines’ viability response to genetic and chemical perturbations. This analysis revealed a generalized transcriptional signature associated with reduced viability across perturbations, which was consistent across post-perturbation time-points, perturbation types, and viability datasets. At a more granular level, we lay out the landscape of treatment-specific expression-viability relationships across a broad panel of drugs and genetic reagents, and we demonstrate that these post-perturbational expression signatures can be used to infer long-term viability. Together, these results help unmask the transcriptional changes that are associated with perturbation-induced viability loss in cancer cell lines.


2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 1323-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Gala de Pablo ◽  
Fern J. Armistead ◽  
Sally A. Peyman ◽  
David Bonthron ◽  
Michael Lones ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document