An Item Factor Analysis of the Mooney Problem Check List

1976 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 509-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Stewart ◽  
Thomas Deiker
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahrul Hayat ◽  
Muhammad Dwirifqi Kharisma Putra ◽  
Bambang Suryadi

Rasch model is a method that has a long history in its application in the fields of social and behavioral sciences including educational measurement. Under certain circumstances, Rasch models are known as a special case of Item response theory (IRT), while IRT is equivalent to the Item Factor Analysis (IFA) models as a special case of Structural Equation Models (SEM), although there are other ‘tradition’ that consider Rasch measurement models not part of both. In this study, a simulation study was conducted to using simulated data to explain how the interrelationships between the Rasch model as a constraint version of 2-parameter logistic (2-PL) IRT, Rasch model as an item factor analysis were compared with the Rasch measurement model using Mplus, IRTPRO and WINSTEPS program, each of which came from its own 'tradition'. The results of this study indicate that Rasch models and IFA as a special case of SEM are mathematically equal, as well as the Rasch measurement model, but due to different philosophical perspectives people might vary in their understanding about this concept. Given the findings of this study, it is expected that confusion and misunderstanding between the three can be overcome.


1987 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne C. Hammer ◽  
Jeffrey B. Brookings

An item factor analysis of the Death Concern Scale replicated the results of a previous study which indicated that the scale measures two modrately correlated components, Conscious Contemplation and Negative Evaluation. Coefficients of congruence for matching factors from the two studies were .96 and .92, respectively. It was concluded, however, that the authors of the previous study recommended the deletion of several items from the scale solely on the basis of a questionable judgmental criterion and that these items should instead be retained.


2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne B. Feinstein ◽  
Brian A. Fallon ◽  
Eva Petkova ◽  
Michael R. Liebowitz

1988 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Fraser ◽  
Roderick P. McDonald

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document