Police and public involvement

2016 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-227
Author(s):  
Linda Evans
Keyword(s):  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
National Health ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
The Public ◽  
Real Nature ◽  
Police Agencies ◽  
Democratic Policing ◽  
The Uk

Public involvement is an ill-defined but important part of government policy. This paper suggests that there are lessons police agencies can learn from the National Health Service in the UK with regard to evaluating public involvement, which is a fundamental activity within the democratic policing model. A study undertaken by the author has enabled an understanding of public and patient involvement (PPI) in terms of its real nature. The study recognises the value of PPI for patients, members of the public and the National Health Service (NHS), and suggests that it is critical to evaluate the outcomes of PPI interventions in order to ensure that the rhetoric of PPI becomes reality and is of value. An evaluation model is outlined which the author suggests could be adapted for use by police agencies not only for the purpose of public involvement but also in relation to improving all services delivered by the police.

Community Involvement in Hospital Governance in Britain: Evidence from before the National Health Service

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 751-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Gorsky
Keyword(s):  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
National Health ◽  
Community Involvement ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Popular Participation ◽  
Hospital Governance ◽  
The Public ◽  
Foundation Trusts ◽  
Health Care Governance

An important goal of policy in the British National Health Service (NHS) is to increase public involvement in health care governance. In the hospital sector this led in 2003 to the establishment of foundation trusts with “membership communities,” which aim to give local citizens a say in management. This is not the first attempt to introduce greater community participation in the running of British hospitals. Prior to the inception of the NHS in 1948, the hospital contributory scheme movement provided ordinary members of the public with the opportunity to sit on hospital management boards. The article examines the nature and extent of this earlier experiment with local democracy in hospital governance. It argues that historical precedent is not particularly encouraging, either for the prospect of broadening popular participation or for making services more responsive to local needs. Although today's context is very different, the tendency for managerial and professional interests to dominate the policy arena is a feature of both periods.

Digital Ophthalmology in the UK – Diabetic Retinopathy Screening and Virtual Glaucoma Clinics in the National Health Service

2020 ◽  
Vol 237 (12) ◽  
pp. 1400-1408
Author(s):  
Heinrich Heimann ◽  
Deborah Broadbent ◽  
Robert Cheeseman
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
National Health ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy Screening ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Retinopathy Screening

AbstractThe customary doctor and patient interactions are currently undergoing significant changes through technological advances in imaging and data processing and the need for reducing person-to person contacts during the COVID-19 crisis. There is a trend away from face-to-face examinations to virtual assessments and decision making. Ophthalmology is particularly amenable to such changes, as a high proportion of clinical decisions are based on routine tests and imaging results, which can be assessed remotely. The uptake of digital ophthalmology varies significantly between countries. Due to financial constraints within the National Health Service, specialized ophthalmology units in the UK have been early adopters of digital technology. For more than a decade, patients have been managed remotely in the diabetic retinopathy screening service and virtual glaucoma clinics. We describe the day-to-day running of such services and the doctor and patient experiences with digital ophthalmology in daily practice.

Accountability for Rationing — Theory into Practice

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 660-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Newdick
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
National Health ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
The Public ◽  
Modern Health Care ◽  
Concept Of Health ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Health Need

Most now recognize the inevitability of rationing in modern health care systems. The elastic nature of the concept of “health need,” our natural human sympathy for those in distress, the increased range of conditions for which treatment is available, the “greying” of the population; all expand demand for care in ways that exceed the supply of resources to provide it. UK governments, however, have found this truth difficult to present and have not encouraged open and candid public debate about choices in health care. Indeed, successive governments have presented the opposite view, that “if you are ill or injured there will be a national health service there to help; and access to it will be based on need and need alone.” And they have been rightly criticized for misleading the public and then blaming clinical and managerial staffin the National Health Service (NHS) when expectations have been disappointed.

National trends and cost of litigation in UK National Health Service (NHS): a specialty-specific analysis from the past decade

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 168-174
Author(s):  
Jenni Lane ◽  
Rahul Bhome ◽  
Bhaskar Somani
Keyword(s):  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
National Health ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Total Annual Cost ◽  
Legal Reforms ◽  
Specific Analysis ◽  
Uk National Health Service ◽  
The Uk ◽  
National Trends

Background and aims Medical litigation claim and costs in UK are rising. This study aims to analyse the 10-year trend in litigation costs for individual clinical specialties in the UK from 2009/10 to 2018/19. Methods Data were procured from National Health Service (NHS) Resolution. Number of claims, total litigation costs and cost per claim were ascertained for each financial year. The data collected also includes the number of claims and average amount per claim per speciality during the years 2009–2019 (2009/2010 to 2018/2019 financial years). Results The total annual cost of NHS litigation is currently £3.6 billion(2018/2019). Damages make up the greatest proportion of costs(£1.5 billion). Surgical specialties have the greatest number of claims annually(2847) but Obstetrics has the greatest total litigation(£1.9 billion) and cost per claim(£2.6 million). Number of claims, total costs and cost per claim are significantly greater in 2018/2019 than in 2009/2010. Conclusions Addressing the issue of litigations is complex. Medically there are speciality specific issues that require attention, whilst some general measures are common to all: effective communication, setting realistic targets and maintaining a motivated, adequately staffed workforce. These, alongside legal reforms, may reduce the financial burden of increasing litigation on the NHS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document