scholarly journals Production behavior evaluation on multilayer commingled stress-sensitive carbonate gas reservoir

2020 ◽  
pp. 014459872096415
Author(s):  
Jianlin Guo ◽  
Fankun Meng ◽  
Ailin Jia ◽  
Shuo Dong ◽  
Haijun Yan ◽  
...  

Influenced by the complex sedimentary environment, a well always penetrates multiple layers with different properties, which leads to the difficulty of analyzing the production behavior for each layer. Therefore, in this paper, a semi-analytical model to evaluate the production performance of each layer in a stress-sensitive multilayer carbonated gas reservoir is proposed. The flow of fluids in layers composed of matrix, fractures, and vugs can be described by triple-porosity/single permeability model, and the other layers could be characterized by single porosity media. The stress-sensitive exponents for different layers are determined by laboratory experiments and curve fitting, which are considered in pseudo-pressure and pseudo-time factor. Laplace transformation, Duhamel convolution, Stehfest inversion algorithm are used to solve the proposed model. Through the comparison with the classical solution, and the matching with real bottom-hole pressure data, the accuracy of the presented model is verified. A synthetic case which has two layers, where the first one is tight and the second one is full of fractures and vugs, is utilized to study the effects of stress-sensitive exponents, skin factors, formation radius and permeability for these two layers on production performance. The results demonstrate that the initial well production is mainly derived from high permeable layer, which causes that with the rise of formation permeability and radius, and the decrease of stress-sensitive exponents and skin factors, in the early stage, the bottom-hole pressure and the second layer production rate will increase. While the first layer contributes a lot to the total production in the later period, the well bottom-hole pressure is more influenced by the variation of formation and well condition parameters at the later stage. Compared with the second layer, the scales of formation permeability and skin factor for first layer have significant impacts on production behaviors.

2014 ◽  
Vol 974 ◽  
pp. 367-372
Author(s):  
Nurul Aimi Ghazali ◽  
T.A.T. Mohd ◽  
N. Alias ◽  
E. Yahya ◽  
M.Z. Shahruddin ◽  
...  

Gas lift is an artificial lift method which is commonly used in offshore operation with sufficient gas sources as it consumes minimum space on the platform. Gas lift operates by injecting a high pressure gas down through the tubing casing annulus of a well and the injected gas enters the tubing through a gas lift valve installed on the tubing. Gas lift increases production by two means, density reduction of oil column inside the tubing so that the flowing bottom-hole pressure which is affected by the hydrostatic pressure of the fluid column is reduced and by providing external energy to the oil as the gas expends.Reducing the bottom-hole pressure will improve the drawdown of the well. A production well is modelled by using a production modelling program, Integrated Production Modeling (IPM) Prosper to analyze the production performance at various conditions. A base case model is developed from the production data of an actual oil field to simulate the performance of the actual well without gas lift system. Later, the gas lift is added to the model and the performance was compared with the base case model. The gas parameter was also studied to determine the optimum injection gas condition for maximum oil production. The gas injected at 1490m can be achieved by injecting the gas with 1200 psi, l300 psi or 1400 psi. However, the optimum gas injection pressure was determined to be at 1400 psi as the design shows that the required unloading stage is the least. The optimum gas injection rate was determined at 5 MMscf/d with the estimated net revenue is the highest. For injection gas gravity, the lighter gas was determined to be the optimum selection since it gives significant reduction of FBHP (Flowing Bottom Hole Pressure) with less hydrostatic pressure inside the tubing column.


2013 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 3291-3298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingze Liu ◽  
Bing Bai ◽  
Xiaochun Li

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document