scholarly journals The Responsible Inclusion of Students Receiving Special Education Services for Emotional Disturbance: Unraveling the Practice to Research Gap

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
John William McKenna ◽  
Michael Solis ◽  
Frederick Brigham ◽  
Reesha Adamson
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Emotional Disturbance ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Education Services ◽  
Research Gap

Helping Teachers Understand and Mitigate Trauma in Their Classrooms

2021 ◽  
pp. 004005992110618
Author(s):  
Lynn S. Burdick ◽  
Catherine Corr
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Elementary School ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Emotional Disturbance ◽  
Emotional Responses ◽  
Classroom Environments ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Education Services ◽  
Working Together ◽  
Trauma Informed

Nine-year old Eliza is a student at Meadows Elementary School where she receives special education services for her diagnosis of Emotional Disturbance. Her teachers are working together to try to bring Eliza back into the classroom after weeks of time spent in the office with no contact with her peers. Mr. Jimenez and Ms. Landon are collaborating to incorporate trauma-informed practices into their classrooms in an attempt to address the absence of secure attachments and feelings of safety in Eliza’s life, as well as her inability to control her emotional responses. Creating a trauma-informed classroom benefits everyone but especially students with disabilities who have experienced trauma. In this paper we discuss the need for trauma-informed practices and strategies for making classroom environments more trauma-informed.

School Context and the Academic and Behavioral Progress of Students with Emotional Disturbance

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary N. Siperstein ◽  
Andrew L. Wiley ◽  
Steven R. Forness
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Emotional Disturbance ◽  
Low Income ◽  
School Context ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Related Services ◽  
Education Services ◽  
School Based ◽  
Reading And Math ◽  
Education Status

Lack of progress of children with emotional disturbance (ED) has begun to be documented in longitudinal school-based studies. Variability in these studies may be due to several factors, including widespread differences in academic, behavioral, and social functioning of these children, their special education status, and school contextual factors. In this study, 86 children were followed over a two-year period: children were drawn from three subgroups—children with ED receiving special education in low-income schools, children with ED receiving special education services in high-income schools, and children not receiving special education services but who were considered high risk for ED. Outcome measures included reading and math achievement along with ratings of behavioral progress. Despite initial differences in overall functioning, there was, almost without exception, no significant progress in any of the three subgroups over the course of a full academic year. This lack of progress was not related to the type of special education and related services that students received in self-contained or full inclusion programs. Results and implications are discussed regarding lack of response of children with or at risk for ED to intervention in both general and special education.

Inclusive Instruction for Students Receiving Special Education Services for Emotional Disturbance: A Survey Development Study

2019 ◽  
pp. 153450841989508
Author(s):  
John William McKenna ◽  
Xiaoxia Newton ◽  
Emily R. Bergman
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Classroom Management ◽  
General Education ◽  
Emotional Disturbance ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Geographic Area ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Education Services ◽  
Inclusive Instruction

Although the majority of students receiving special education services for emotional disturbance (ED) receive a significant amount of instruction in general education classrooms, evidence-based practices for educating students with ED in these settings have yet to be identified. As a result, school-based practitioners must primarily rely on professional recommendations and values when planning and delivering inclusive instruction for this student population. This study investigated the internal consistency and factor structure of a survey measure designed to obtain information on practitioner knowledge, use, and perceived effectiveness of recommended classroom-based practices for the inclusive instruction of students with ED. Results indicate adequate internal consistency. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a four-factor structure: Behavior Support, Classroom Management, Differentiation, and Instructional Practices. Study limitations include a low response rate for the electronic survey and reliance on responses from practitioners from one geographic area. Future investigations are necessary to refine the survey instrument and to obtain data from teachers from other geographic areas.

Republication of “A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of the Effects of Special Education Services”

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul L. Morgan ◽  
Michelle L. Frisco ◽  
George Farkas2 ◽  
Jacob Hibel
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Children With Disabilities ◽  
Behavioral Outcomes ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Education Services ◽  
Education Professionals ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
Services And Supports

Editor’s Note Since the landmark enactment of Education of the Handicapped Act in 1975, special education supports and services have been provided to children with disabilities. Although costly, the intentionality of these specialized services has been to advance the educational and societal opportunities of children with disabilities as they progress to adulthood. For our republished article in this issue of JSE’s 50th anniversary volume, we have selected an article by Paul Morgan, Michelle Frisco, George Farkas, and Jacob Hibel. In this research, Morgan and his colleagues quantified the effectiveness of special education services on children’s learning and behavioral outcomes using large-scale longitudinal data. Their results challenge all education professionals to explore ways to increase the effectiveness of special education and to document research efforts that provide clear evidence that the services and supports provided to individuals with disabilities are improving the extent to which they fully experience the benefits of education and participate fully in society.

Lack of Focus on Special Education in Literature on Educational Reform

1987 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Stephen Lilly
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
Special Educators ◽  
Compensatory Education ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Education Services ◽  
Nation At Risk ◽  
Current State ◽  
Education Community ◽  
Effective Integration

The lack of focus on special education in the Sizer, Boyer, and Goodlad reports, as well as Nation at Risk, is analyzed. It is posited that mere neglect might not account for this lack of attention and that current shortcomings of special education services might lead the authors of the reports to focus on improvement of general education opportunities for all students rather than increased compensatory education. In its current state, special education for the “mildly handicapped” might well be seen by these authors as part of the problem, rather than part of the solution. To remedy this situation, special educators must increasingly see themselves as members of the general education community and work toward more effective integration of special and general education.

The Use of Rating Scales With Children Who Have Language Impairments

2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Redmond
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Emotional Disorders ◽  
Rating Scales ◽  
Language Impairments ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
Language Bias ◽  
Education Services ◽  
Behavioral Rating ◽  
Behavioral Rating Scales

Several reports suggest that socio-emotional disorders and language impairments frequently co-occur in children receiving special education services. One explanation for the high levels of co-occurrence is that limitations inherent to linguistic deficiencies are frequently misinterpreted as symptomatic of underlying socioemotional pathology. In this report, five commonly used behavioral rating scales are examined in light of language bias. Results of the review indicated that children with language impairments are likely to be overidentified as having socioemotional disorders. An implication of these findings is that speech-language pathologists need to increase their involvement in socioemotional evaluations to ensure that children with language impairments as a group are not unduly penalized for their language limitations. Specific guidelines for using ratings with children with language impairments are provided.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document