Use of Subjective Global Assessment and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Geriatric Patients Receiving Nutrition Support

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 454-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betül Gülşen Atalay ◽  
Cahide Yaǧmur ◽  
Tarik Zafer Nursal ◽  
Hakan Atalay ◽  
Turgut Noyan
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
Nutrition Support ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment

Subjective Global Assessment Can Be Performed in Critically Ill Surgical Patients as a Predictor of Poor Clinical Outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thainá Gattermann Pereira ◽  
Jaqueline da Silva Fink ◽  
Jéssica Abdo Gonçalves Tosatti ◽  
Flávia Moraes Silva
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment ◽  
Critically Ill Surgical Patients

Poor Interrater Reliability of Retrospectively Applied Subjective Global Assessment for Malnutrition in the Critically Ill

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-22
Author(s):  
Janelle O. Poyant ◽  
Tejaswi Kanderi ◽  
Sara R. DiCecco ◽  
Joy R. Heimgartner ◽  
Kianoush B. Kashani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment

The Benefits of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Versus Enteral Nutrition (EN) Among Adult Critically Ill Patients: What is the Evidence? A Literature Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 615-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel Joel Cadena ◽  
Sara Habib ◽  
Fred Rincon ◽  
Stephanie Dobak
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Nutrition Support ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation Duration ◽  
The Impact

Malnutrition is frequently seen among patients in the intensive care unit. Evidence shows that optimal nutritional support can lead to better clinical outcomes. Recent clinical trials debate over the efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) over parenteral nutrition (PN). Multiple trials have studied the impact of EN versus PN in terms of health-care cost and clinical outcomes (including functional status, cost, infectious complications, mortality risk, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and mechanical ventilation duration). The aim of this review is to address the question: In critically ill adult patients requiring nutrition support, does EN compared to PN favorably impact clinical outcomes and health-care costs?

Subjective global assessment: A reliable nutritional assessment tool to predict outcomes in critically ill patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Fontes ◽  
Simone de Vasconcelos Generoso ◽  
Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment

Nutrition and Clinical Outcomes of Nutrition Support in Multidisciplinary Team for Critically Ill Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 633-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Shin Lee ◽  
Ji Eun Kang ◽  
So Hyun Park ◽  
Hye Kyung Jin ◽  
Soo Min Jang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Nutrition Support
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document