scholarly journals Sa2022 – Exploring Relationships Between Handgrip Strength, Midupper Arm Circumference, Subjective Global Assessment and Clinical Outcomes in Cirrhosis: A Prospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-474
Author(s):  
Erin D. Wishart ◽  
Lorian Taylor ◽  
Louisa Lam ◽  
Kaleb J. Marr ◽  
Quinn Fitzgerald ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Yong Zeng ◽  
Shao-Dan Feng ◽  
Gong-Ping Chen ◽  
Jiang-Nan Wu

Abstract Background Early identification of patients who are at high risk of poor clinical outcomes is of great importance in saving the lives of patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the context of limited medical resources. Objective To evaluate the value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), calculated at hospital admission and in isolation, for the prediction of the subsequent presence of disease progression and serious clinical outcomes (e.g., shock, death). Methods We designed a prospective cohort study of 352 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 between January 9 and February 26, 2020, in Yichang City, Hubei Province. Patients with an NLR equal to or higher than the cutoff value derived from the receiver operating characteristic curve method were classified as the exposed group. The primary outcome was disease deterioration, defined as an increase of the clinical disease severity classification during hospitalization (e.g., moderate to severe/critical; severe to critical). The secondary outcomes were shock and death during the treatment. Results During the follow-up period, 51 (14.5%) patients’ conditions deteriorated, 15 patients (4.3%) had complicated septic shock, and 15 patients (4.3%) died. The NLR was higher in patients with deterioration than in those without deterioration (median: 5.33 vs. 2.14, P < 0.001), and higher in patients with serious clinical outcomes than in those without serious clinical outcomes (shock vs. no shock: 6.19 vs. 2.25, P < 0.001; death vs. survival: 7.19 vs. 2.25, P < 0.001). The NLR measured at hospital admission had high value in predicting subsequent disease deterioration, shock and death (all the areas under the curve > 0.80). The sensitivity of an NLR ≥ 2.6937 for predicting subsequent disease deterioration, shock and death was 82.0% (95% confidence interval, 69.0 to 91.0), 93.3% (68.0 to 100), and 92.9% (66.0 to 100), and the corresponding negative predictive values were 95.7% (93.0 to 99.2), 99.5% (98.6 to 100) and 99.5% (98.6 to 100), respectively. Conclusions The NLR measured at admission and in isolation can be used to effectively predict the subsequent presence of disease deterioration and serious clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.


2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 940-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim S. Thomas ◽  
Anthony D. Ormerod ◽  
Fiona E. Craig ◽  
Nicola Greenlaw ◽  
John Norrie ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chutchawan Ungthammakhun ◽  
Vasin Vasikasin ◽  
Dhitiwat Changpradub

Abstract Background: Extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (XDRAB) is an important cause of nosocomial pneumonia with limited therapeutic options. Colistin based regimen is recommended treatment. Which drugs should be combined with colistin remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with XDRAB pneumonia who were treated with colistin, combined with either 6-g sulbactam or carbapenems, in the setting of high MIC to sulbactam. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, hospitalized patients diagnosed with XDRAB pneumonia in Phramongkutklao Hospital were enrolled. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 7 and 14-day mortality, length of stay, ventilator days and factors associated with mortality. Results: From 1 July 2016 to 30 September 2017, 192 patients were included; 92 received colistin plus sulbactam and 90 received colistin plus carbapenems. Most of the patients were male diagnosed with ventilator associated pneumonia in medical intensive care unit. Overall mortality rates at 7, 14, 28 days were 24.2%, 37.4%, 53.3%, respectively. Mortality rates did not differ between sulbactam group and carbapenems groups at 7 days (19.6% vs. 28.9%, p-value 0.424, adjusted HR 1.277; 95% CI = 0.702-2.322), 14 days (34.8% vs. 40%, p = 0.658, adjusted HR 1.109; 95% CI = 0.703-1.749) and 28 days (51.1% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.857, adjusted HR 1.038; 95% CI = 0.690-1.562). Length of stay, ICU days and ventilator days did not differ. Complications of treatment including acute kidney injury were not statistically different. Conclusions: In XDRAB pneumonia with high MIC to sulbactam, mortality rates were not statistically significant between colistin plus 6-g sulbactam and colistin plus carbapenems. Keywords: XDR A. baumannii pneumonia, mortality rate, colistin based, sulbactam, carbapenems


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document