Regulatory Toxicology in Controversy

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 727-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Demortain
2021 ◽  
pp. 019262332098325
Author(s):  
Alys E. Bradley ◽  
Maurice G. Cary ◽  
Kaori Isobe ◽  
Stuart Naylor ◽  
Stephen Drew

This Proof of Concept (POC) study was to assess whether assessment of whole slide images (WSI) of the 2 target tissues for a contemporaneous peer review can elicit concordant results to the findings generated by the Study Pathologist from the glass slides. Well-focused WSI of liver and spleen from 4 groups of mice, that had previously been diagnosed to be the target tissues by an experienced veterinary toxicologic pathologist examining glass slides, were independently reviewed by 3 veterinary pathologists with varying experience in assessment of WSIs. Diagnostic discrepancies were then reviewed by an experienced adjudicating pathologist. Assessment of microscopic findings using WSI showed concordance with the glass slides, with only slight discrepancy in severity grades noted. None of the lesions recorded by the Study pathologist were “missed” and no lesions were added by the pathologists evaluating WSIs, thus demonstrating equivalence of the WSI to glass slides for this study.


1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-178
Author(s):  
Johannes J.M. van de Sandt ◽  
Victor J. Feron

With rapidly increasing knowledge of toxicological processes, the scientific value and relevance of toxicity studies for risk assessment must be re-evaluated. In this paper, it is proposed that the rigid risk evaluation currently required should be replaced by a more flexible, case-by-case approach, in order to increase the relevance of each animal test conducted. The development of new types of toxicity studies and their application in risk evaluation are also described.


2014 ◽  
pp. 849-853
Author(s):  
Herbert Desel ◽  
Pieter Brekelmans ◽  
Ronald de Groot

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document