Comparing Weighted and Unweighted Grade Point Averages in Predicting College Success of Diverse and Low-Income College Students

2014 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell T. Warne ◽  
Chanel Nagaishi ◽  
Michael K. Slade ◽  
Paul Hermesmeyer ◽  
Elizabeth Kimberli Peck
1994 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 963-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles D. Pringle

This study provided an initial test of a comprehensive model of individual performance. The extent to which one's opportunity, capacity, and willingness to perform predict one's actual performance is examined. A questionnaire designed to measure opportunity, capacity, and willingness was administered to 213 college students, while performance was measured by the students' grade point averages Scores on Capacity and Willingness interacted to provide a reasonably accurate prediction of performance, but the effect of scores on Opportunity was nonsignificant.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin A. Tate ◽  
Nadya A. Fouad ◽  
Laura Reid Marks ◽  
Gary Young ◽  
Eddie Guzman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Eleni Oikonomidoy ◽  
Adrienne L. Edwards ◽  
Matthew Aguirre ◽  
Maria Sandra Jimenez ◽  
Joseph Lykes ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie M. Hansen ◽  
Aaron P. Jackson ◽  
Tyler R. Pedersen

Research suggests that career development courses have positive impacts on college students’ career development outputs. What is less established is the impact of these career courses on educational outcomes like retention, graduation rate, and academic performance. This study compared two groups of undergraduate students: one that successfully completed a career development course ( n = 3,546) and a matched group of students who did not take the career course ( n = 3,510). The groups were compared on graduation rate, time to graduation, course withdrawals, and cumulative grade point averages (GPAs). The career development course was not a significant predictor of graduation within 6 years, the number of semesters to graduate, or the number of withdrawals incurred. However, the career development course did significantly predict the total number of credits (participants graduated with about five more credits) and cumulative GPA at graduation (participants graduated with higher GPAs).


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip Zepp ◽  
Derek Potter ◽  
Camila Haselwood ◽  
Sonya Britt-Lutter

2022 ◽  
pp. 0192513X2110648
Author(s):  
Blair Harrington

While considerable attention has been given to the ways that parents contribute to undergraduates’ success, far less attention has been given to what these students do for their families, variation in students’ provision of help, or the consequences of giving. Drawing on 61 interviews with Asian American college students from diverse ethnic and class backgrounds, this paper extends conventional understanding of families and college by analyzing the financial assistance and translation support Asian American undergraduates give their parents. Using a trichotomous model of class—comparing disadvantaged, advantaged, and ambiguous students—I show that class disadvantage motivated students’ helping, advantage deterred it, while the ambiguous fell in between. Culture (i.e., filial piety) and a broad view of family (i.e., siblings’ contributions) also influenced students’ help. Finally, based on interview data combined with partial support from analysis of participants' grade point averages data, I demonstrate that helping had positive and negative implications for students’ college experience.


Author(s):  
Janel E. Benson ◽  
Elizabeth M. Lee

Chapter 7 shows how campus geographies expose students to different models of success (or not) and shape their strategies for attaining that success. Play Hard students learn early not to prioritize academic outcomes above friendships and social life but rather to focus on building powerful networks with more affluent friends through parties, team sports, and Greek Life. Work Hard students, by contrast, remain in more class-segregated spaces, meaning they have less exposure to peers with upper-class habituses. They prioritize building their formal resume, connections with faculty, and having high grade point averages, which guide their decisions both academically and in terms of the kinds of extracurricular opportunities they seek out. Multisphere students rely on both academic and network strategies and seem to be comfortable navigating each, while Disconnected students struggle to locate a clear and consistent route toward post-college success and plan to rely on themselves.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document