A Reflective Conversation with Loretta Bradley: Issues in Counseling the Gifted and Talented Student

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Shaughnessy ◽  
Loretta Bradley
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-104
Author(s):  
Scott J. Peters ◽  
Matthew C. Makel ◽  
Karen Rambo-Hernandez

Conversations over who should be identified as gifted continue perpetually both within the field and in the popular media. In this article, we focus on the use of local norms as one approach to gifted identification that can increase the equity of advanced educational programs and services while also better achieving their stated purpose of providing additional challenge to those students who need it. In this article, we define local norms, explain their purpose, provide examples of schools that have used local norms, discuss common challenges, and provide a tutorial and external resources on how schools can begin to use local norms as part of their gifted identification process.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott J. Peters ◽  
Matthew C. Makel ◽  
Karen E Rambo-Hernandez

Conversations over who should be identified as “gifted” continue perpetually both within the fieldand in the popular media. In this paper, we focus on the use of local norms as one approach togifted identification that can increase the equity of advanced educational programs and serviceswhile also better achieving their stated purpose of providing additional challenge to thosestudents who need it. In this paper, we define local norms, explain their purpose, provideexamples of schools who have used local norms, discuss common challenges, and finally weprovide a “how to” tutorial on how schools can begin to use local norms as part of their giftedidentification process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott J. Peters ◽  
James Carter ◽  
Jonathan A. Plucker

In the 21st century, what does a defensible, equitable model of gifted and talented student identification look like? For too long, gifted education’s reason for being has been unclear, and the students it has served have been from too narrow a segment of the student population. With renewed attention to equity and personalized learning, gifted education should exist as one pathway through which students can have their needs met. Scott Peters, James Carter, and Jonathan Plucker outline several best practices in identifying gifted and talented students that, if implemented, would better align with the goal of gifted education, while also improving equity.


1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-183
Author(s):  
Joseph T. Zilliox ◽  
Shannon G. Lowrey

We have always attempted to involve as many people as possible-teachers, students, and classroom visitors-in making decisions about the content and process of learning mathematics in our sixth-grade class. In so doing, we have all learned together. While investigating properties of polygon and polyhedra, a challenge was posed to the class. The challenge appeared in Focus, a publication of the Mathematical Association of America (MM) (1994). A class of gifted and talented student in Maryland had constructed a large polyhedron with faces that measured thirteen inche to a side. The new letter contained a challenge to reader to better this record.


1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 22-29
Author(s):  
Christiane Kendrick

This case study shows how art raises self-esteem in students and how art programs offer opportunities for students to be identified for gifted and talented programs. Programs offering nurturance, guidance, and challenges are needed in gifted and talented students’ lives. Without opportunities for enhanced learning, we fail to educate children to their greatest potentials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document