Faith and Knowledge: Habermas’ Alternative History of Philosophy1

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Hans Joas

Jürgen Habermas’ philosophical oeuvre so far contained only few references to thinkers prior to Kant. The publication of a comprehensive history of Western philosophy by this author, therefore, came as a surprise. The book is not, as many had anticipated, a book about religion, but about the gradual emancipation of “secular” “autonomous” rationality from religion, although in a way that preserves a normative commitment to Christianity. While welcoming this attitude and praising the achievements of this book, this text is also critical with regard to Habermas' understanding of faith and hints at several shortcomings of the historical argument resulting from this deficient presupposition.


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-291
Author(s):  
Paulo De Medeiros

Was den Kern der europäischen Identität ausmacht, ist freilich mehr der Charakter schmerzlicher Lernprozesse als dessen Ergebnis. Die Erinnerung an den moralischen Abgrund, in den uns der nationalistische Exzess geführt hat, verleiht unserem heutigen Engagement den Stellenwert einer Errungenschaft. (Jürgen Habermas1)



2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 97-110
Author(s):  
Abbot Vitaly Utkin

The author examines the characteristics of Post-Secularity as the continuation of the modern in the history of Russian secularization in the 18th – first half of the 19th century using the methodology of Jürgen Habermas. The author views the Orthodox clergy of Russian Church as one of “the instruments” of the modern in Russia. The ideology of the clergy, while preserving the sacred dogmatic and liturgical fundamentals, was rationalized down to the limit due to ecclesiastic education based on the studies of Latin. In the eyes of the state power the clergy was some kind of petty officials meant to play the civilizing role for the people. And that resulted in the disagreement of the ideology of the clergy and Russian peasantry that was very vividly demonstrated in the course of popular uprisings, – and most of all in the so-called “Potato Riots”.





1969 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-110
Author(s):  
Carla Milani Damião ◽  
Miguel Gally de Andrade ◽  
Virgínia De Araújo Figueiredo

Josef Früchtl é considerado parte da terceira geração da Escola de Frankfurt [1]. É autor, além de muitos artigos publicados em jornais, revistas e periódicos, dos seguintes livros: Mimesis - Konstellation eines Zentralbegriffs bei Adorno (Königshausen & Neumann,1986) – (Mímesis – constelação de um conceito central em Adorno); Aesthetische Erfahrung und moralisches Urteil. Eine Rehabilitierung (Suhrkamp, 1996) – (Experiência estética e juízo moral. Uma reabilitação); Das unverschämte Ich. Eine Heldengeschichte der Moderne (O Eu impertinente. Uma história heroica da modernidade) [2]. Seu livro mais recente é Vertrauen in die Welt: eine Philosophie des Films [3]  (Confiança no Mundo. Uma Filosofia do filme). Atualmente, Früchtl é professor da Faculdade de Filosofia e Artes da Universidade de Amsterdã, na Holanda, após um período como professor da Universidade de Münster, na Alemanha. Foi presidente da Sociedade Alemã de Estética (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ästhetik) e é co-editor da revista Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und All­gemeine Kunstwissenschaft. [1] Josef Früchtl foi orientado inicialmente por Jürgen Habermas e Brigitte Scheer, da qual foi professor assistente na Universidade de Frankfurt. [2] Este livro foi publicado originalmente pela Editora Suhrkamp em 2004 e traduzido para o inglês pela Stanford University Press em 2009 sob o título The impertinent Self. An heroic history of modernity. Cf. comentários a este livro na Revista Inquietude (www.revistainquietude.org) [3] Vertrauen in die Welt : eine Philosophie des Films. München, Fink, 2013. Traduzido para o inglês Trust in the World. A Philosophy of Film.



2020 ◽  
Vol IV (4) ◽  
pp. 297-313
Author(s):  
Nelia Motroshilova

Review of: Habermas, J. 2019. [in German]. Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie. 2 vols. Berlin: Suhrkamp.



2021 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-301
Author(s):  
Geert Van Eekert

Abstract Pas de deux with a theological legacy. Jürgen Habermas on David Hume and Immanuel Kant In his latest opus magnum, Jürgen Habermas reconsiders the history of philosophy from a peculiar perspective: the true and unique nature of philosophy is shown to have been given shape in philosophy’s dispute with Christian theology. This article reviews Habermas’ chapter on the Enlightenment, in which Habermas casts David Hume and Immanuel Kant dancing their own pas de deux with that theological legacy. After having sketched the historical scripts in which Hume and Kant are involved by Habermas, I will critically assess the author’s claim that while Hume ends up refusing the dance and (hence) betraying (enlightened) philosophy’s nature, Kant accepts and transforms the heritage, yet ends up failing to give his pas de deux a genuine modern and enlightened twist.



2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Klaus Viertbauer

Habermas’s postmetaphysical reading of Kierkegaard is paradigmatic for his understanding of religion. It shows, why Habermas reduces religion to fideism. Therefore the paper reconstructs Habermas’s reception of Kierkegaard and compares it with the accounts of Dieter Henrich and Michael Theunissen. Furthermore it demonstrates how Habermas makes use of Kierkegaard’s dialectics of existence to formulate his postmetaphysical thesis of a cooperative venture.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document