Percutaneous intervention to correct central venous port catheter malposition

Perfusion ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 404-406
Author(s):  
Yen-Hsiang Wang ◽  
Chieh-Shou Su ◽  
Keng-Hao Chang ◽  
Chi-Jen Went ◽  
Wen-Lieng Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Intervention ◽  
Intravenous Therapy ◽  
Port Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Central Venous Port ◽  
Venous Port ◽  
Port Access ◽  
Catheter Malposition ◽  
Port Catheters

The use of central venous port access is increasing due to the requirements of multimodal intravenous therapy.1 However, catheter malposition in smaller veins can lead to vein thrombosis, phlebitis and pain. Herein, we report our experience with the use of percutaneous interventions to correct migrated port catheter malposition. Minimally invasive percutaneous interventional correction of malposition could be an alternative to extraction and re-implantation of malpositioned port catheters.

Percutaneous retrieval of dislodged central venous port catheter: experience of 25 patients in a single institute

2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po-Chin Wang ◽  
Huei-Lung Liang ◽  
Tuno-Ho Wu ◽  
Jer-Shyung Huang ◽  
Yih-Huie Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Port Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Percutaneous Retrieval ◽  
Central Venous Port ◽  
Venous Port

scholarly journals Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis related to central venous port systems implanted in cancer patients

2010 ◽  
Vol 83 (994) ◽  
pp. 850-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Yukisawa ◽  
Y Fujiwara ◽  
Y Yamamoto ◽  
T Ueno ◽  
K Matsueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Central Venous Port ◽  
Venous Port ◽  
Port Systems ◽  
Deep Vein

scholarly journals Fibrin sheaths in central venous port catheters: treatment with low-dose, single injection of urokinase on an outpatient basis

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 111-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
De-Hua Chang ◽  
Kamal Mammadov ◽  
Tilman Hickethier ◽  
Jan Borggrefe ◽  
Martin Hellmich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Single Injection ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Central Venous Port ◽  
Venous Port ◽  
Port Catheters

Placement of central venous port catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters in the routine clinical setting of a radiology department: analysis of costs and intervention duration learning curve

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 1468-1475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Rotzinger ◽  
Bernhard Gebauer ◽  
Dirk Schnapauff ◽  
Florian Streitparth ◽  
Gero Wieners ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Radiology Department ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Central Venous Port ◽  
Venous Port ◽  
Large Patient ◽  
Central Catheters ◽  
Port Catheters

Background Placement of central venous port catheters (CVPS) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) is an integral component of state-of-the-art patient care. In the era of increasing cost awareness, it is desirable to have more information to comprehensively assess both procedures. Purpose To perform a retrospective analysis of interventional radiologic implantation of CVPS and PICC lines in a large patient population including a cost analysis of both methods as well as an investigation the learning curve in terms of the interventions’ durations. Material and Methods All CVPS and PICC line related interventions performed in an interventional radiology department during a three-year period from January 2011 to December 2013 were examined. Documented patient data included sex, venous access site, and indication for CVPS or PICC placement. A cost analysis including intervention times was performed based on the prorated costs of equipment use, staff costs, and expenditures for disposables. The decrease in intervention duration in the course of time conformed to the learning curve. Results In total, 2987 interventions were performed by 16 radiologists: 1777 CVPS and 791 PICC lines. An average implantation took 22.5 ± 0.6 min (CVPS) and 10.1 ± 0.9 min (PICC lines). For CVPS, this average time was achieved by seven radiologists newly learning the procedures after performing 20 CVPS implantations. Total costs per implantation were €242 (CVPS) and €201 (PICC lines). Conclusion Interventional radiologic implantations of CVPS and PICC lines are well-established procedures, easy to learn by residents, and can be implanted at low costs.

External Jugular Vein Cross-Over as a New Technique for Percutaneous Central Venous Port Access in Case of Left Central Venous Occlusion

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Yves Marcy ◽  
Mostafa El Hajjam ◽  
Alexis Lacout ◽  
Caroline Nöel ◽  
Jean Jacques Simon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Venous Occlusion ◽  
External Jugular Vein ◽  
New Technique ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Central Venous Port ◽  
Venous Port ◽  
Port Access ◽  
Central Venous Occlusion ◽  
A New Technique

scholarly journals Difficult extraction of long-term central venous port-catheters : 4 cases

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 2741-2744
Author(s):  
Naoki HASHIZUME ◽  
Hirotsugu TERAKURA ◽  
Kazuhiko YOSHIMOTO
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous ◽  
Central Venous Port ◽  
Venous Port ◽  
Port Catheters
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document