Pattern and types of non-saphenous vein reflux

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 51-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
R D Malgor ◽  
N Labropoulos

Venous reflux often originates from saphenous trunks and their tributaries. In about 10% of the patients reflux derived from non-saphenous veins (NSV) such as those located in the buttock, posterolateral thigh, vulva, lower posterior thigh, popliteal fossa, knee or along the peripheral nerves such as the tibial and sciatic nerve. It is also important to note that patients who had saphenous vein stripping or ablation have higher odds of presenting with NSV reflux. The majority of patients with NSV reflux have varicose veins and lower extremity oedema; however, about 10% of those patients present with skin damage. This paper analyses the patterns and types of NSV reflux for diagnosis and treatment purposes.

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
C A Engelhorn ◽  
R Manetti ◽  
M M Baviera ◽  
G M Bombonato ◽  
M Lonardoni ◽  
...  

Background Venous ultrasonography identifies reflux patterns of the great and small saphenous veins (GSV, SSV), allowing evaluation of lower extremities for treatment planning and patient follow-up. Objective To determine progression of saphenous vein reflux patterns in women with primary venous valvular insufficiency. Methods Venous ultrasonography was performed in the extremities of 92 women, 43 ± 12 (23–77) years old, CEAP (clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathological elements) clinical classes C1–C2. Two examinations were performed 33 ± 19 (8–89) months apart in patients without saphenous vein treatment. GSV and SSV reflux patterns were classified as segmental, multisegmental, distal, proximal, diffuse and normal. Prevalence was determined for each examination, separately for right and left extremities, and jointly. Prevalence was compared using χ2 statistics. Results Reflux prevalence was higher for the GSV, 89% (164/184) and 88% ( n = 162), than for the SSV, 24% ( n = 45) and 30% ( n = 56), respectively for first and second examinations ( P < 0.001). Reflux pattern prevalence was not significantly different in the right and left extremities (1.0 > P > 0.14). Most prevalent patterns were (a) GSV segmental reflux initially, 41% (76/184), decreasing to 28% (52/184) ( P = 0.009), and (b) GSV multisegmental reflux at the second examination, increasing from 26% (48/184) to 40% (73/184) ( P = 0.006). Prevalence of other GSV or SSV reflux patterns did not change significantly (0.88 > P > 0.19). Conclusions We documented early findings and venous reflux progression in a specific population of women with varicose veins, reticular veins and telangiectasias. GSV segmental reflux was most prevalent initially, progressing to GSV multisegmental reflux.


Vascular ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 623-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Chait ◽  
Pavel Kibrik ◽  
Kevin Kenney ◽  
Ahmad Alsheekh ◽  
Yuriy Ostrozhynskyy ◽  
...  

Objective Iliac vein stenting has been an evolving treatment option in the management of CVI secondary to iliac vein obstruction. Historically, treatment of CVI has been focused on the elimination of saphenous vein disease; however, the effect of reduction of iliac vein obstruction on superficial venous reflux remains largely unknown. This study aimed to identify the effect of iliac vein stenting on saphenous vein reflux. Methods In this retrospective study spanning course of five years, we performed 2681 venograms with venoplasties and stenting of the iliac veins. Pre-operative and post-operative venous mapping was performed via duplex ultrasonography. Patients who received any lower extremity vascular intervention between “pre-” and “post-stenting” duplex ultrasonography examination, other than iliac vein stenting, were excluded from analysis. Results One thousand six hundred forty-five patients, of which 63.2% were female, underwent iliac vein stenting; 1033 patients received bilateral intervention, whereas 356 and 259 patients received unilateral left and right stenting, respectively. The average age of the patient cohort was 66 (range 22–100; SD ± 13.9). The distribution CEAP scores of each limb at the time of intervention were: C2 (1%), C3 (25%), C4 (51%), C5 (5%), and C6 (18%). Bilateral iliac vein stenting significantly reduced reflux in the bilateral great saphenous and small saphenous veins by 363.8 ms ( p < 0.0001) and 345.4 ms ( p < 0.0002), respectively, but had no effect on ASV reflux. Unilateral stenting did not produce significant reductions in reflux, besides an average reduction of 573.2 ms ( p = 0.004) in the left great saphenous vein. Conclusion Bilateral iliac vein stenting decreased great saphenous vein and small saphenous vein reflux. Unilateral stenting did not demonstrate a significant reduction in saphenous reflux. Bilateral reduction in stenosis of the iliac veins may influence superficial venous reflux.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 547-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Prasad Bellam Premnath ◽  
Binu Joy ◽  
Vijayakumar Akondi Raghavendra ◽  
Ajith Toms ◽  
Teena Sleeba

Various treatment methods are available for the treatment of varicose veins, and there has been a recent surge in the usage of cyanoacrylate glue for treating varicose veins. Purpose To investigate the technical possibility, efficiency and safety of cyanoacrylate adhesive embolization and sclerotherapy using commonly available n-butyl cyanoacrylate glue for the treatment of primary varicose veins due to great saphenous vein reflux with or without incompetent perforators. Materials and Methods One hundred forty-five limbs of 124 patients with varicose veins due to great saphenous vein reflux were subjected to cyanoacrylate adhesive embolization and sclerotherapy – adhesive embolization of great saphenous vein in the thigh and perforators using cyanoacrylate followed by sclerotherapy of any residual varicose veins in the leg. Procedural success, venous closure rates and clinical improvement were assessed. Follow-up for 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months was obtained. Results Technical success rate was 100%. Saphenous vein closure rate was 96.5% at one year. There was no femoral venous extension of cyanoacrylate in any of the patients. Posterior tibial vein extension of cyanoacrylate was seen in three patients (2.6%) without untoward clinical effect.Significant improvement was found in venous clinical severity score (VCSS) from a baseline mean of 7.98 ± 4.42 to 4.74 ± 3, 1.36 ± 1.65 and 0.79 ± 1.19 at 1, 6 and 12 months’ follow-up. Ulcer healing rate was 100%. Conclusion Cyanoacrylate adhesive embolization and sclerotherapy for the treatment of primary varicose veins is efficacious and can be performed as an outpatient procedure, but has a guarded safety profile due to its propensity to cause deep venous occlusion if not handled carefully.


1974 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kenneth Booking ◽  
Margot R. Roach

Simultaneous measurements of pressure and volume were made on nine great saphenous veins obtained at autopsies and nine great saphenous veins that were stripped during surgery from patients with primary varicose veins. Similar measurements were also made on six great saphenous veins obtained at autopsy before and after they were held at 100 cm H2O for 4 h. Circumferential tensions were calculated from Laplace's law (tension = pressure × radius).The great saphenous veins from patients with primary varicose veins had significantly greater radii and were more distensible than the normal great saphenous veins. After being held at 100 cm H2O for 4 h, the normal great saphenous veins became less distensible and their radii at distending pressures increased.Due to the great difference in radii, the circumferential tension on a great saphenous vein from a patient with primary varicose veins is much greater than that on a normal great saphenous vein at the same distending pressure. However, the physical stresses exerted on the great saphenous veins during the stripping operations may influence our results in some unknown way.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 34-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M T Perkins

This article examines the practice of standard varicose vein surgery including sapheno-femoral and sapheno-popliteal ligation, perforator surgery and surgery for recurrent varicose veins. The technique of exposure of the sapheno-femoral junction and the sapheno-popliteal junction is outlined and advice given on avoidance of complications for both. The evidence regarding methods of closure over the ligated sapheno-femoral junction is examined as is the requirement for stripping and the use of different types of stripper. The requirement to strip the small saphenous vein and the extent of dissection necessary in the popliteal fossa is also examined. Complications of standard varicose vein surgery are outlined. The frequency of wound infection, nerve injury, vascular injury and venous thromboembolism are listed and strategies to avoid these complications are examined.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2050313X1877716
Author(s):  
Alice M Whiteley ◽  
Judith M Holdstock ◽  
Mark S Whiteley

A 56-year-old woman presented in 2006 with symptomatic primary varicose veins in her right leg. Venous duplex ultrasonography at that time showed what appeared to be “neovascular tissue” around the saphenofemoral junction. However, there had been no previous trauma or surgery in this area. This appearance has subsequently been described as primary avalvular varicose anomalies. She underwent endovenous treatment at that time. In 2018, she presented with symptomatic recurrent varicose veins of the same leg. Venous duplex ultrasonography showed successful ablation of the great saphenous and anterior accessory saphenous veins. All of the recurrent venous reflux was arising from the primary avalvular varicose anomalies. This report shows that primary avalvular varicose anomalies is a previously unreported cause of recurrent varicose veins and leads us to suggest that if found, treatment of the primary avalvular varicose anomalies should be considered at the primary procedure.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Zierau UT

The thrombosis in areas of the superficial truncal varicose veins and cutaneous veins is not a rare complication; it requires drug or surgical therapy if the thrombosis grows in the direction of deep veins. This situation is particularly striking in the case of thromboses of the great saphenous vein GSV and small saphenous vein SSV as well as other saphenous veins and leads to deep vein thrombosis in around 20% of cases. We will report about a case of SSV thrombosis and the catheter-based therapy of thrombosis following the therapy of truncal varicose vein SSV with VenaSeal® in one session.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-101
Author(s):  
Vasanthakumar Packiriswamy ◽  
Satheesha B Nayak

Knowledge of normal as well as variant great saphenous vein is useful as it is the vein that can get varicosed; the vein that is used in bypass surgeries and the vein that is used for cannulation purpose. We observed almost complete duplication of the great saphenous vein in the left lower limb of an adult male cadaver. Both the great saphenous veins arose from the medial end of the dorsal venous arch and coursed parallel to each other throughout the limb. They united in the femoral triangle to form a short (1 inch long) common great saphenous vein. Common great saphenous vein terminated into the femoral vein. There were four communicating veins connecting the two great saphenous veins in the leg, giving the appearance of a venous ladder. Knowledge of this variation could be extremely useful in treatment of varicose veins of lower limb, in catheterizations and in various surgical procedures of the lower limb.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document