The relation between clinical scores and quality-of-life in long-term follow-up

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio S Catarinella ◽  
Fred HM Nieman ◽  
Cees HA Wittens
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Negative Correlation ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Venous Obstruction ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Venous Clinical Severity Score

Introduction Quality-of-life and severity scores are both popular measures in medicine. For deep venous obstruction, the VEINES-QOL/Sym and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) are widely used. Combining a patient-reported outcome with a clinical severity score should give a more sensitive outcome for treatment results. To establish and compare their suitability for deep venous disease, we compared the outcomes of both scores in a group of patients who were interventionally treated for deep venous disease. Methods The venous clinical severity scores and VEINES-QOL/Sym scores of a group of patients who had received interventional treatment for deep venous obstruction more than 12 months ago were compared at T0 and T12. Results Both the Spearman’s rho and Pearson’s r show a very weak, negative correlation (statistically significant ( p ≤ 0.05)), between the venous clinical severity score and VEINES-QOL at T12 and between the venous clinical severity score and the VEINES-SYM at both T0 and T12. T0 VCSS-VSYM: rho = −0.219 ( p = 0.052), r = −0.236 ( p = 0.037), T12 VCSS-VQOL: rho = −0.459 ( p = 0.007), r = −0.379 ( p = 0.030), T12 VCSS-VSYM: rho = −0.463 ( p = 0.007), r = −0.432 ( p = 0.012). This negative correlation was not statistically ( p ≥ 0.05) confirmed for T0 VCSS-VSYM. Conclusion The physician-scored venous clinical severity score of patients treated for deep venous obstruction does not correlate well with their self-reported quality-of-life and symptom scores.

Venous Clinical Severity Score and quality-of-life assessment tools: application to vein practice

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 259-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
M A Vasquez ◽  
C E Munschauer
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Venous Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Disease Specific

The time is ripe for universal understanding and acceptance of outcome assessment in venous disease. Outcome studies promote understanding of the diseases we treat and the results of treatment. The choice of a valid and reliable assessment tool is crucial. Patient-generated quality-of-life tools include generic instruments and disease-specific instruments. Generic instruments evaluate overall well-being and provide subjective measurements of treatment outcomes in various disease states. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and the Nottingham Health Profile are widely used generic surveys. Disease-specific instruments relate to a particular disease state. They are popular in venous disease reporting and have high sensitivity. The Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire, the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study, the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire and the Charing Cross Venous Ulceration Questionnaire are such devices. Physician-generated measurement tools are used to evaluate and classify the consequences of venous disease. The clinical, aetiology, anatomy, pathophysiology classification (CEAP) is a popular descriptive platform for chronic venous disease. The Venous Severity Scoring (VSS) system was derived from the CEAP classification to provide evaluative capabilities. The three elements of the VSS are the venous disability score, the venous segmental disease score and the venous clinical severity score (VCSS). The VCSS facilitates the follow-up of features of venous disease that change with treatment. Each of these outcomes tools has been validated, and each has strengths and weaknesses. Maintaining the dynamic nature of assessment with periodic review and revision is the way forward to generating universal applicability. Although the choice of instrument is debatable, the most important factor in improving treatment outcomes is the decision to examine results and to share them in a meaningful way.

scholarly journals Evaluation of liquid or foam sclerotherapy in small varicose veins (ceap c1) with venous clinical severity score

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (12) ◽  
pp. 1117-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Ali Kaygin ◽  
Umit Halici
Keyword(s):  
Severity Score ◽  
Skin Necrosis ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Venous Clinical Severity Score ◽  
The Mean

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of liquid or foam sclerotherapy of varicose veins using venous clinical severity scores and possible complications. METHODS: A total of 318 patients (268 females, 50 males) who were treated with liquid or foam sclerotherapy between January 2012 and December 2012 were included in this study. RESULTS: Skin necrosis was observed in only 6 patients (1. 8%), thrombophlebitis in 10 patients (3. 1%), and hyperpigmentation in 18 patients (5. 6%) in this study group. The mean venous clinical severity score was calculated as: pain score, 1. 23 ± 0.88; varicose vein score,1.85 ± 0. 8; edema score, 0.64 ± 0.77). Pain and edema decreased at the control examination, 1 month after completion of sclerotherapy sessions. Varicose veins completely disappeared after sclerotherapy. While the decrease in edema in the foam sclerotherapy group was significantly less (P<0.001), the decline in pain showed an increasing trend (P=0.069). While skin necrosis did not develop after foam sclerotherapy, rates of pigmentation and local thrombophlebitis were similar (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we observed that both sclerotherapy methods are effective with a low rate of complications, alleviating the complaints of patients with small varicose veins, and providing considerable improvement in venous clinical severity scores.

The role of radical surgery in the management of CEAP C5/6 and lipodermatosclerosis

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 753-768
Author(s):  
Gábor Martis ◽  
Renáta Laczik
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Wound Healing ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Group 1

Aim Analysis of the radical removing of the dermatosclerotic tissues and ulcer(s) with perforator veins dissection as well as local wound and standard compression treatment of CEAP C5/6 stage in a prospective comparative cohort study. Primary endpoint is to compare the results of the one-year follow-up regarding quality of life, vein clinical severity score, and ulcer healing process. Secondary endpoint is the precise presentation of the surgical technique. Tertiary endpoint is to demonstrate the photo-documented results of the postoperative wound treatment protocol. Method Clinical and statistical comparison of radical surgery versus solely wound care and compression in a cohort of 15 patients in each group (Groups 1, 2). In Group 1, radical removing of the dermatosclerotic pannicule and leg ulcer, perforator vein dissection, great saphenous vein, or small saphenous vein was performed. Quality of life , pain intensity, vein clinical severity score and patients’ load capacity were compared. The tissue oxygen saturation changes were monitored via near infra-red spectroscopy. Results Both groups were statistically comparable. Wound healing in the operated group was 100% versus 60% in the second one, the difference was significant, p = 0.006. The quality of life: 45.33 versus 36.8, p < 0.001, intensity of leg restless and pain: 2.28 versus 5.3, p < 0.001, changes of vein clinical severity score: 5.27 versus 20.93, p < 0.001, changes of tO2sat: 19.00 versus 6.07 in the upper third of the leg p < 0.001, proved significantly better in group 1 compared to 2. Load capacity was significantly better in group 1 than 2 at the end of the study. The average wound healing time was 113 days in group 1. Conclusion The radical surgery provides significantly better results, considering quality of life, vein clinical severity score, load capacity than the conservative treatment in this study.

Revised Venous Clinical Severity Score: A Facile Measurement of Outcomes in Venous Disease

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 119-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
M A Vasquez ◽  
C E Munschauer
Keyword(s):  
Severity Score ◽  
Common Ground ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Venous Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Data Assessment

Outcome assessment is an important criterion for the objective determination of the risks and benefits of a given procedure. The choice of an assessment instrument is critical in order to generate meaningful and relevant data. Assessment instruments are platforms for comparison and stratification of information that provide a common ground and unified language for discussions on disease processes and therapies. Like many complex conditions, venous disease has benefited from the institution of several assessment instruments designed to clarify elements of the disease process. Among these is the venous clinical severity score (VCSS), which has proved to be a valuable tool for evaluating changes in condition over time with or without intervention. The VCSS has recently undergone a revision to increase its sensitivity and value in interpreting the language of venous disease.

scholarly journals Laser-assisted strategy for reflux abolition in a modified CHIVA approach

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Gianesini ◽  
Erica Menegatti ◽  
Michele Zuolo ◽  
Mirko Tessari ◽  
Paolo Spath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severity Score ◽  
Resistance Index ◽  
Peak Systolic Velocity ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Chronic Venous Disease ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Diastolic Velocity ◽  
Venous Clinical Severity Score

The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and efficacy of an endovenous laser (EL) assisted saphenous-sparing strategy in chronic venous disease (CVD). Fourteen CVD patients (C2,3,4s Ep As Pr1,2,3) underwent a saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) treatment by EL just from below the superficial epigastric vein downward for a limited tract, together with a flush ligation of the incompetent tributaries of the great saphenous vein (GSV) along the leg. The following GSV parameters were assessed 15 cm below the SFJ: reflux time, caliber, peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), resistance index (RI). Venous clinical severity score and the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysio logical (CEAP) classification clinical classes were assessed. At 1 year follow up 3 cases were considered failures because of a GSV thrombosis, even if they presented a GSV recanalization with a laminar flow within at the 2 years follow-up. Eleven procedures succeeded because neither minor nor major peri-procedural complications were reported, apart 2 cases of self-healing bruising. In these last 11 cases the procedure led to a GSV reflux suppression (from 3.1±0.4 s to a retrograde laminar draining flow), to a GSV caliber reduction (from 9.4±0.5 to 3.1±0.2 cm, P&lt;0.001), to a PSV reduction (from 50.2±4.6 to 18.4±3.5 cm/s, P&lt;0.001), to a RI reduction (from 0.9±0.2 to 0.51±0.2, P&lt;0.005) and to an oscillatory flow suppression (EDV from -8.9±1.6 to 6.2±2.3 cm/s, P&lt;0.001). Both CEAP and venous clinical severity score improved from 3 to 1 (P&lt;0.001) and from 7±2 to 2±1 (P&lt;0.05), respectively. The GSV flow reappeared below the shrunk tract draining into the re-entry perforator. Sapheno-femoral reflux suppression can be obtained by just a GSV segmental closure. An almost 80% of success rate of the present investigation paves the way for an even wider diffusion of endovenous techniques, moreover erasing the surgical requirements for those who would like to perform a saphenoussparing strategy. In this way new devices could be used inside equally innovative strategies.

Does body mass index have an effect on clinical and pain after endovenous therapy? A retrospective study

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110365
Author(s):  
Mehmet O Donbaloğlu
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Venous Reflux ◽  
Venous Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vas Scores

Objectives: The study aims to investigate the change in postoperative clinic, pain, and general quality of life of patients who were operated on due to chronic venous disease (CVD), according to their body mass index (BMI). Materials and methods: 150 patients (30–45 years) who were treated with cyanoacrylate embolization for CVD between January 2017 and February 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical (C) category of clinical, etiology, anatomy, and pathophysiology (CEAP) classification venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires were applied to the patients before and after the operation periodically. The patients were surveyed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th months. Results: The patients were divided into three groups according to their BMI. In the comparison between normal and overweight participants, venous reflux, CEAP C categories, and VAS scores were not statistically significantly different in preoperative and postoperative periods. In the comparison between normal and obese participants, CEAP C categories, VCSS, and VAS scores were statistically significantly different in postoperative periods. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of venous reflux preoperatively and postoperatively in all three groups. Conclusions: The study showed that the increase in BMI had negative effects on the CEAP C categories, pain, and quality of life independently of the venous reflux of CVD.

scholarly journals Efficacy of a Low-Dose Diosmin Therapy on Improving Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 999
Author(s):  
Raffaele Serra ◽  
Nicola Ielapi ◽  
Andrea Bitonti ◽  
Stefano Candido ◽  
Salvatore Fregola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Active Group ◽  
Chronic Venous Disease ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Venous Clinical Severity Score

Chronic Venous Disease (CVD) is a common medical condition affecting up to 80% of the general population. Clinical manifestations can range from mild to more severe signs and symptoms that contribute to the impairment of the quality of life (QoL) of affected patients. Among treatment options, venoactive drugs such as diosmin are widely used in the symptomatic treatment in all clinical stages. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a new formulated diosmin in relieving symptoms and improving QoL in patients suffering from CVD. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical study, CVD patients with a Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) classification system between C2 and C4 were randomized to receive a bioavailable diosmin (as μsmin® Plus) 450 mg tablet once daily or a placebo for 8 weeks. Clinical symptoms and QoL were monitored using the measurement of leg circumference, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Global Index Score (GIS) and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). A total of 72 subjects completed the study. From week 4, leg edema was significantly decreased in the active group (p < 0.001). An improvement in the VAS score was observed in the active group compared to placebo at the end of treatment (p < 0.05). GIS and VCSS scores were significantly improved in the active group at week 8 (p < 0.001). No treatment related-side effects were recorded. The results of this study showed that the administration of low-dose μsmin® Plus was safe and effective in relieving symptoms and improving QoL in subjects with CVD.

Σύγκριση της αποτελεσματικότητας της χειρουργικής επέμβασης της σαφηνεκτομής και τοπικών εκριζώσεων στην αντιμετώπιση των συμπτωμάτων σε ασθενείς με χρόνια φλεβική νόσο

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Χρυσάνθη Παπαγεωργοπούλου
Keyword(s):  
Severity Score ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Venous Clinical Severity Score

Στόχος: Ο στόχος της μελέτης είναι η επικύρωση του 3D εργαλείου βαθμολόγησης – αξιολόγησης για τη χρόνια φλεβική νόσο, όπως προτάθηκε στο SYM VEIN consensus. Μέθοδος: Η παρούσα κλινική μελέτη είναι μία προοπτική μελέτη κοόρτης που περιλαμβάνει συνολικά τριάντα πέντε (35) ασθενείς, κατόπιν συναίνεσης, με χρόνια φλεβική νόσο. Οι ασθενείς αυτοί που θα υποβάλλονταν σε σαφηνεκτομή εκτιμήθηκαν με το αναθεωρημένο Venous Clinical Severity Sore (r-VCSS), με το CIVIQ-20 ερωτηματολόγιο για την ποιότητα ζωής και με το 3D σύστημα βαθμονόμησης του SYM VEIN consensus, προεγχειρητικά και τέσσερεις εβδομάδες μετά την επέμβαση. Το συνολικό αποτελέσματα του 3D εργαλείου αξιολόγησης ελέγχθηκε για την ανταπόκρισή του, για την αξιοπιστία του και για τη δομική του εγκυρότητα.Αποτελέσματα: Το συνολικό αποτέλεσμα του 3D εργαλείου αξιολόγησης αποδείχθηκε καλής αξιοπιστίας και εσωτερικής συνοχής (Cronbach’s alpha 0,85). Η πρωταρχική ανάλυση των καταληκτικών σημείων ταυτοποίησε τρεις ομάδες συμπτωμάτων (παραισθησία, καυστικό άλγος, κνησμός vs αίσθημα βάρους, αίσθημα οιδήματος, κνησμός vs σύνδρομο ανήσυχων ποδιών, πάλλων πόνος) αποδεικνύοντας μία υψηλή συσχέτιση των συμπτωμάτων που περιλαμβάνονται στην ίδια ομάδα και πιθανώς μοιράζονται κοινή παθοφυσιολογία, ενδεικτικό της επαρκούς δομικής εγκυρότητας του εργαλείου αξιολόγησης. Το συνολικό αποτέλεσμα του 3D εργαλείου αξιολόγησης είχε σημαντική συσχέτιση με το r-VCSS και το αποτέλεσμα του CIVIQ-20 (rho 0,46, p = 0,005 and rho 0,65, p < 0,001, αντίστοιχα), ενδεικτικό της επαρκούς συγκλίνουσας εγκυρότητας. Μετά τη σαφηνεκτομή, παρατηρήθηκαν στατιστικώς σημαντικές μειώσεις (p < 0,001) του συνολικού αποτελέσματος του 3D εργαλείου αξιολόγησης, αλλά και των επιμέρους αποτελεσμάτων του 3D εργαλείου για όλα τα φλεβικά συμπτώματα εκτός από δύο, ενδεικτικό της εξαιρετικής ανταπόκρισης του εργαλείου στη θεραπεία. Η διάμεση τιμή της συνολικής βαθμολογίας του 3D εργαλείου αξιολόγησης μειώθηκε από το 31 στο 6 (83,8% μείωση, p < 0,001), η διάμεση τιμή του r-VCSS μειώθηκε από το 6 στο 0 (100% μείωση, p < 0,001), και η μέση τιμή της βαθμολογίας του CIVIQ-20 μειώθηκε από το 24 στο 14 (40% μείωση, p < 0,001). Η διαφορά της ποσοστιαίας αλλαγής της διάμεσης τιμής των αποτελεσμάτων μεταξύ των r-VCSS και του CIVIQ-20 σε σύγκριση με τη συνολική βαθμολογία του 3D εργαλείου αξιολόγησης ήταν στατιστικώς σημαντική (p = 0,005 and p < 0,001, αντίστοιχα).Συμπέρασμα: Το συνολικό αποτέλεσμα του 3D SYM VEIN εργαλείου αξιολόγησης έχει καλή αξιοπιστία, δομική εγκυρότητα και εξαιρετική ανταπόκριση στη θεραπεία, παρά του ότι είναι λιγότερο επιρρεπές στην αλλαγή μετά τη σαφηνεκτομή, σε σύγκριση με την αναθεωρημένη μορφή του Venous Clinical Severity Score (r-VCSS).

scholarly journals Performance characteristics of the venous clinical severity score

2002 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 889-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark H. Meissner ◽  
Cynthia Natiello ◽  
Stephen C. Nicholls
Keyword(s):  
Severity Score ◽  
Performance Characteristics ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Venous Clinical Severity Score

Comparison of disease-specific quality of life tools in patients with chronic venous disease

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 648-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mong-Loon Kuet ◽  
Tristan RA Lane ◽  
Muzaffar A Anwar ◽  
Alun H Davies
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Varicose Vein ◽  
Strong Correlation ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Chronic Venous Disease ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Disease Specific

Objectives This work was presented as a poster in the American Venous Forum 25th Annual Meeting; 28 February 2013; Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome measure in the treatment for chronic venous disease. The Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and the ChronIc Venous Insufficiency quality of life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) are two validated disease-specific QoL questionnaires in current use. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between the AVVQ and the CIVIQ-14 to enable better comparison between studies and to compare these disease-specific QoL tools with generic QoL and clinician-driven tools. Methods Adults attending our institution for management of their varicose veins completed the AVVQ, CIVIQ-14 and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). Clinical data, CEAP classification and the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) were collected. The relationship between the AVVQ and CIVIQ-14 scores was analysed using Spearman’s correlation. The AVVQ and CIVIQ-14 scores were also analysed with a generic QoL tool (EQ-5D) and a clinician-driven tool, the VCSS. Results One hundred patients, mean age 57.5 (44 males; 56 females), participated in the study. The median AVVQ score was 21.9 (range 0–74) and the median CIVIQ-14 score was 30 (range 0–89). A strong correlation was demonstrated between the AVVQ and CIVIQ-14 scores ( r = 0.8; p < 0.0001). Strong correlation was maintained for patients with C1-3 disease ( r = 0.7; p < 0.0001) and C4-6 disease ( r = 0.8; p < 0.0001). The VCSS correlated strongly with the AVVQ and CIVIQ-14 scores ( r = 0.7; p < 0.0001 and r = 0.7; p < 0.0001, respectively). Both the AVVQ and CIVIQ-14 scores correlated well with the EQ-5D score ( r = −0.5; p < 0.0001 and r = −0.7; p < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusions This study demonstrates that there is good correlation between two widely used varicose vein specific QoL tools (AVVQ and CIVIQ-14) across the whole spectrum of disease severity. Strong correlation exists between these disease-specific QoL tools and generic and clinician-driven tools. Our findings confirm valid comparisons between studies using either disease-specific QoL tool.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document