scholarly journals ‘It was like taking an inner bath’: A qualitative evaluation of a collaborative advance care planning-approach

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110432
Author(s):  
Anna J Pedrosa Carrasco ◽  
Martin Koch ◽  
Teresa Machacek ◽  
Anna Genz ◽  
Svenja Herzog ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Relationship Dynamics ◽  
Barriers To Participation ◽  
Planning Approach ◽  
Advance Care

Background: Impaired readiness may hinder purposeful advance care planning in cancer patients. To reduce barriers to participation in end-of-life decision-making, a collaborative intervention was developed combining a psycho-oncological approach of dignity-based and cognitive-behavioural interventions, followed by a standardised advance care planning-process. Aim: To evaluate the novel collaborative advance care planning-approach by synthetising cancer patient and carer perspectives on communicational and relational effects. Design: As a sub-project of a mixed-methods evaluation study, we conducted an inductive content analysis of qualitative interviews with advanced cancer patients and caregivers to deeply explore the focused impact of a collaborative advance care planning-approach on communication and relationship dynamics. Setting/participants: Twelve patients with advanced cancer and 13 carers who participated in a collaborative advance care planning-intervention. Results: The collaborative advance care planning-approach was consistently evaluated positively by participants. Transcriptions of the semi-structured interviews were coded, analysed and merged under three main themes concerning communicational and relationship dynamics: action readiness, content readiness and impact on future communication and relationship. Conclusions: The novel intervention served to foster individual readiness – including action and content readiness – for advance care planning-discussions by addressing highly individualised barriers to participation, as well as specific end-of-life issues. In addition, societal readiness could be promoted. Although the brief psycho-oncological intervention could not fully meet the needs of all participants, it can be used to develop individual psychotherapeutic strategies to improve different facets of readiness. The collaborative advance care planning-approach might require more time and human resources, but could pioneer successful advance care planning.

Outcomes Associated with End-of-Life Discussions (DRAFT)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanori Mori
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Aggressive Care

Physicians and advanced cancer patients are often reluctant to talk about death. They frequently avoid end-of-life discussions (EOLds), although such conversations are essential to initiate advance care planning. In this prospective, a longitudinal multisite cohort study of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers, the authors suggested cascading benefits of EOLds between patients and their physicians. In total, 123 of 332 (37.0%) patients reported having EOLds with their physicians at baseline. EOLds were not associated with higher rates of emotional distress or psychiatric disorders. Instead, after propensity-score weighted adjustment, EOLds were associated with less aggressive medical care near death and earlier hospice referrals. Aggressive care was associated with worse patient quality of life and worse bereavement adjustment. These findings may help destigmatize EOLds and assist physicians and patients in initiating such conversations and engaging in advance care planning.

Use of a computer model and care coaches to increase advance care planning conversations for patients with metastatic cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8-8
Author(s):  
Divya Gupta ◽  
Touran Fardeen ◽  
Winifred Teuteberg ◽  
Briththa Seevaratnam ◽  
Mary Khay Asuncion ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Computer Model ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Survival Prognosis ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Lay Care

8 Background: Patients with metastatic cancer benefit from advance care planning (ACP) conversations. Despite initiatives which train providers to have ACP conversations using the serious illness care program (SICP) conversation guide, few patients have a documented prognosis discussion due to busy clinic schedules and difficulty in deciding the right times to have such conversations. We designed an intervention to improve ACP by incorporating a validated computer model to identify patients at high risk for mortality in combination with lay care coaches. We investigated whether this would improve end of life quality measures. Methods: Four Stanford clinics were included in this pilot; all received SICP training. Two clinics (thoracic and genitourinary) underwent the intervention (computer model + care coach), and two clinics (sarcoma and cutaneous) served as the control. For providers in the intervention, an email was sent every Sunday listing the metastatic cancer patients who would be seen in clinic the following week and a predicted prognosis generated by the model. A lay care coach contacted patients with a predicted survival ≤2 years to have an ACP conversation with them. After, the care coach notified the provider to suggest discussion regarding prognosis with the patient. Criteria for a patient visit to be included in the analysis were: age ≥18, established patient, has sufficient EMR data for computer model, and no prior prognosis documentation. The primary outcome was documentation of prognosis in the ACP form by the end of the week following the clinic visit. Results: 5330 visits in 1298 unique patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 67 (range 19-97); 790 male, 508 female. 1970 visits were with patients with ≤2 year predicted survival. Prognosis discussion was documented by providers in the ACP form for 8.1% of intervention visits compared to 0.07% of control visits (p=0.001 in mixed effects model). Of the 1298 unique patients, 84 were deceased by December 2020. 41.7% died in the hospital. 59.5% were enrolled in hospice prior to death, and 19.0% were hospitalized in the ICU ≤14 days prior to death. Of deceased patients with ACP form prognosis documentation, 5.0% had ≥2 hospitalizations in the 30 days before death compared to 23.4% of deceased patients with no prognosis documented (p=0.10). For ≥ 2 ER visits in the 30 days before death, the proportions were 5.0% and 20.3% (p=0.17). Conclusions: This pilot study supports that our intervention is associated with higher rates of prognosis discussions and documentation. There was a trend towards better quality of end of life care as noted by higher rates of hospice enrollment and less intensive care at end of life. These results merit further investigation as a means to improve goal-concordant care and ensure appropriate care for cancer patients at the end of life.

Using a values assessment as a bridge to advance care planning: Results of 1286 patient reports.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
John Russell Hoverman ◽  
Cynthia Taniguchi ◽  
Kathryn J Eagye ◽  
Susan Ash-Lee ◽  
Angela Kalisiak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Patient Reports ◽  
Values Assessment ◽  
Advance Care

12 Background: Recent studies have shown that formal Palliative Care (PC) improves care at the end of life for cancer patients. The role of communication in PC is not defined. Other studies have shown that communication alone can be associated with better end of life outcomes. The US Oncology Network developed and tested a Values Assessment (VA) instrument for routinely broaching difficult topics to facilitate more formal advance care planning (ACP). The results of the first 28 months of the program on over 1200 patients are reported here. Methods: The VA consists of 10 questions of the format “How valuable is it to me to….”, for example “know that I am not a burden to my family, friends or helpers?” Responses were on a 4 point scale from unsure to very valuable. The VA was completed either in person in the clinic or telephonically. VA participation by n = 1286 metastatic cancer patients treated at participating practices from 4/1/2013-7/31/2015 were extracted from the EHR and confirmed by chart review, as were demographic (age, gender, ethnicity), clinical (diagnosis and stage), chemotherapy treatment and outcomes (hospice enrollment and place of death). Demographics and outcomes were compared using the Chi-Squared or Fisher’s Exact Test, or Wilcoxon Rank Sums test for continuous variables. Results: 1268 patients completed the VA. 56.7% were 65 or over. 57.8% went on to complete Advance Directives (AD). 52% had colon or lung cancer. There were 438 deaths of which 431 had a date of last chemotherapy recorded. Of these 431 patients, 78% died at home or inpatient hospice, 14.6% in the hospital. Hospice enrollment with AD was 76.1%, without 60.9%. (p = .008) Median LOS in hospice was 21 days vs. 12.5 (p = .025). Chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life was 7.05% with AD, 13.4% without. The VA was well accepted by patients. Conclusions: A VA as a routine part of practice is feasible and scalable. It can be delivered successfully either face to face or telephonically. It facilitates ACP discussion leading to AD. The results suggest VA and ACP lead to less aggressive care at the end of life.

Treatment preferences and advance care planning at end of life: The role of ethnicity and spiritual coping in cancer patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gala True ◽  
Etienne J. Phipps ◽  
Leonard E. Braitman ◽  
Tina Harralson ◽  
Diana Harris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Spiritual Coping ◽  
Treatment Preferences ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advance Care

scholarly journals Views of advanced cancer patients, families, and oncologists on initiating and engaging in advance care planning: a qualitative study

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. Toguri ◽  
L. Grant-Nunn ◽  
R. Urquhart
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Formal Training ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Services And Supports

Abstract Background Advance care planning (ACP) is a process by which patients reflect upon their goals, values and beliefs to allow them to make decisions about their future medical treatment that align with their goals and values, improving patient-centered care. Despite this, ACP is underutilized and is reported as one of the most difficult processes of oncology. We sought to: 1) explore patients’ and families’ understanding, experience and reflections on ACP, as well as what they need from their physicians during the process; 2) explore physicians’ views of ACP, including their experiences with initiating ACP and views on ACP training. Methods This was a qualitative descriptive study in Nova Scotia, Canada with oncologists, advanced cancer out-patients and their family members. Semi-structured interviews with advanced cancer out-patients and their family members (n = 4 patients, 4 family members) and oncologists (n = 10) were conducted; each participant was recruited separately. Data were analyzed using constant comparative analysis, which entailed coding, categorizing, and identifying themes recurrent across the datasets. Results Themes were identified from the patient / family and oncologist groups, four and five respectively. Themes from patients / families included: 1) positive attitudes towards ACP; 2) healthcare professionals (HCPs) lack an understanding of patients’ and families’ informational needs during the ACP process; 3) limited access to services and supports; and 4) poor communication between HCPs. Themes from oncologists included: 1) initiation of ACP discussions; 2) navigating patient-family dynamics; 3) limited formal training in ACP; 4) ACP requires a team approach; and 5) lack of coordinated systems hinders ACP. Conclusions Stakeholders believe ACP for advanced cancer patients is important. Patients and families desire earlier and more in-depth discussion of ACP, additional services and supports, and improved communication between their HCPs. In the absence of formal training or guidance, oncologists have used clinical acumen to initiate ACP and a collaborative healthcare team approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document