Implementation Monitoring of a Promotora-Led, Home-Based Obesity Prevention Pilot Study With Latino Preschool Children and Their Mothers

Author(s):  
Sharon E. Taverno Ross ◽  
Ivonne Smith Tapia ◽  
Ruth P. Saunders ◽  
Patricia I. Documet ◽  
Russell R. Pate

Background Latino preschool children have higher rates of obesity than children from other racial/ethnic backgrounds. Few effective, culturally-tailored obesity prevention interventions exist that have focused on Latino preschool children, and even fewer have published results of the process evaluation. The purpose of this paper was to monitor reach, fidelity, and completeness of implementation to determine whether ANDALE, a promising promotora-led, home-based pilot study to prevent obesity in Latino preschool children, was implemented as planned. Methods Guided by a logic model, we assessed reach, implementation fidelity and completeness through descriptive analyses of multiple data sources. Reach was assessed through attendance records. Fidelity was assessed via observation checklist and completeness was assessed via survey with both parents and promotoras in a subsample of 12 families. Results Promotoras recruited participants primarily through their own social networks and delivered the intervention to 50 families (mother-child dyads); the majority were of Mexican-origin, low-acculturation, dual-parent households. Nearly all (98%) families completed the whole 10-week intervention. Results demonstrated completeness and fidelity of implementation were acceptable in a subsample of 12 families. In sum, 75% of families in the subsample met the criteria (≥75%) for overall implementation of essential program elements (i.e., reach, completeness, and fidelity). Conclusion Evidence suggests that ANDALE was delivered with high levels of completeness and fidelity in this sample of Latino families with preschool-aged children. These results support implementation of ANDALE in a large, randomized trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1168-1176
Author(s):  
Jennifer C Sanchez-Flack ◽  
Annie Herman ◽  
Joanna Buscemi ◽  
Angela Kong ◽  
Alexis Bains ◽  
...  

Abstract Previous systematic reviews have examined the efficacy of obesity prevention interventions within early childcare/education settings. Often lacking in these reviews is reporting on external validity, which continues to be underemphasized compared to internal validity. More attention to external validity would help better translate evidence-based interventions to real-world settings. This systematic review aimed to determine the availability of data on both internal and external validity across dimensions of the Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework in studies reporting on obesity prevention interventions in early childcare/education settings. Inclusion criteria included: randomized controlled trials, early childcare/education setting, targeted children 2–6 years old, addressed both diet and physical activity, collected measures of weight status and diet and/or physical activity, and published within the last 10 years. Searches were conducted in ERIC, PsychInfo, and PubMed; 23 studies met inclusion criteria. A validated RE-AIM abstraction tool was used to code studies. Most commonly reported dimensions were Reach (62.3%), Implementation (53.5%), and Efficacy/Effectiveness (48.7%). Adoption (21.7%) and Maintenance (11.6%) were less often reported. All studies reported on primary outcomes, but few reported on RE-AIM indicators of characteristics of participation and adoption, quality of life, methods used to identify staff, staff inclusion/exclusion criteria and adoption rates, implementation fidelity, measures of cost to start-up and deliver the intervention, and indicators of maintenance. This systematic review underscores the need for more focus on external validity to inform replication, dissemination, and implementation so that evidence-based early childcare/education obesity interventions can be generalized to real-world settings.


2018 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 549-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jess Haines ◽  
◽  
Sabrina Douglas ◽  
Julia A. Mirotta ◽  
Carley O’Kane ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 674-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy E. Sherwood ◽  
Meghan M. JaKa ◽  
A. Lauren Crain ◽  
Brian C. Martinson ◽  
Marcia G. Hayes ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 673-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bronwyn Simpson ◽  
Annie McCluskey ◽  
Natasha Lannin ◽  
Reinie Cordier
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nduka C. Okwose ◽  
Leah Avery ◽  
Nicola O’Brien ◽  
Sophie Cassidy ◽  
Sarah J. Charman ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Less than 10% of heart failure patients in the UK participate in cardiac rehabilitation programmes. The present pilot study evaluated feasibility, acceptability and physiological effects of a novel, personalised, home-based physical activity intervention in chronic heart failure. Methods Twenty patients (68 ± 7 years old, 20% females) with stable chronic heart failure due to reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (31 ± 8 %) participated in a single-group, pilot study assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a 12-week personalised home-based physical activity intervention aiming to increase daily number of steps by 2000 from baseline (Active-at-Home-HF). Patients completed cardiopulmonary exercise testing with non-invasive gas exchange and haemodynamic measurements and quality of life questionnaire pre- and post-intervention. Patients were supported weekly via telephone and average weekly step count data collected using pedometers. Results Forty-three patients were screened and 20 recruited into the study. Seventeen patients (85%) completed the intervention, and 15 (75%) achieved the target step count. Average step count per day increased significantly from baseline to 3 weeks by 2546 (5108 ± 3064 to 7654 ± 3849, P = 0.03, n = 17) and was maintained until week 12 (9022 ± 3942). Following completion of the intervention, no adverse events were recorded and quality of life improved by 4 points (26 ± 18 vs. 22 ± 19). Peak exercise stroke volume increased by 19% (127 ± 34 vs. 151 ± 34 m/beat, P = 0.05), while cardiac index increased by 12% (6.8 ± 1.5 vs. 7.6 ± 2.0 L/min/m2, P = 0.19). Workload and oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold also increased by 16% (49 ± 16 vs. 59 ± 14 watts, P = 0.01) and 10% (11.5 ± 2.9 vs. 12.8 ± 2.2 ml/kg/min, P = 0.39). Conclusion The Active-at-Home-HF intervention is feasible, acceptable and effective for increasing physical activity in CHF. It may lead to improvements in quality of life, exercise tolerance and haemodynamic function. Trial Registration www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT0367727. Retrospectively registered on 17 September 2018.


2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Langan ◽  
K DeLave ◽  
L Phillips ◽  
P Pangilinan ◽  
S Brown

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document