scholarly journals Feasibility of low-dose digital pulsed video-fluoroscopic swallow exams (VFSE): effects on radiation dose and image quality

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 1037-1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Weiss ◽  
Mike Notohamiprodjo ◽  
Klement Neumaier ◽  
Minglun Li ◽  
Wilhelm Flatz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Research Evaluation ◽  
Diagnostic Image Quality ◽  
Organ Doses ◽  
Dose Area Product ◽  
Thermoluminescent Dosimeters ◽  
Area Product

Background Fluoroscopy is a frequently used examination in clinical routine without appropriate research evaluation latest hardware and software equipment. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of low-dose pulsed video-fluoroscopic swallowing exams (pVFSE) to reduce dose exposure in patients with swallowing disorders compared to high-resolution radiograph examinations (hrVFSE) serving as standard of reference. Material and Methods A phantom study (Alderson-Rando Phantom, 60 thermoluminescent dosimeters [TLD]) was performed for dose measurements. Acquisition parameters were as follows: (i) pVFSE: 76.7 kV, 57 mA, 0.9 Cu mm, pulse rate/s 30; (ii) hrVFSE: 68.0 kV, 362 mA, 0.2 Cu mm, pictures 30/s. The dose area product (DAP) indicated by the detector system and the radiation dose derived from the TLD measurements were analyzed. In a patient study, image quality was assessed qualitatively (5-point Likert scale, 5 = hrVFSE; two independent readers) and quantitatively (SNR) in 35 patients who subsequently underwent contrast-enhanced pVFSE and hrVFSE. Results Phantom measurements showed a dose reduction per picture of factor 25 for pVFSE versus hrVFSE images (0.0025 mGy versus 0.062 mGy). The DAP (µGym2) was 28.0 versus 810.5 (pVFSE versus hrVFSE) for an average examination time of 30 s. Direct and scattered organ doses were significantly lower for pVFSE as compared to hrVFSE ( P < 0.05). Image quality was rated 3.9 ± 0.5 for pVFSE versus the hrVFSE standard; depiction of the contrast agent 4.8 ± 0.3; noise 3.6 ± 0.5 ( P < 0.05); SNR calculations revealed a relative decreased of 43.9% for pVFSE as compared to hrVFSE. Conclusion Pulsed VFSE is feasible, providing diagnostic image quality at a significant dose reduction as compared to hrVFSE.

Ultra-Low-Dose CT of the Thorax Using Iterative Reconstruction: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose Reduction

2015 ◽  
Vol 204 (6) ◽  
pp. 1197-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yookyung Kim ◽  
Yoon Kyung Kim ◽  
Bo Eun Lee ◽  
Seok Jeong Lee ◽  
Yon Ju Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Radiation Dose Reduction ◽  
Low Dose Ct

scholarly journals Reducing cranial computed tomography effective radiation dose by 30% using adaptive iterative dose reduction

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 230-234
Author(s):  
Wai-Yung Yu ◽  
Thye Sin Ho ◽  
Henry Ko ◽  
Wai-Yee Chan ◽  
Serene Ong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Diagnostic Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Doses ◽  
Effective Radiation Dose ◽  
Diagnostic Image ◽  
Ct Head ◽  
Effective Radiation

Introduction: The use of computed tomography (CT) imaging as a diagnostic modality is increasing rapidly and CT is the dominant contributor to diagnostic medical radiation exposure. The aim of this project was to reduce the effective radiation dose to patients undergoing cranial CT examination, while maintaining diagnostic image quality. Methods: Data from a total of 1003, 132 and 27 patients were examined for three protocols: CT head, CT angiography (CTA), and CT perfusion (CTP), respectively. Following installation of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D software, tube current was lowered in consecutive cycles, in a stepwise manner and effective radiation doses measured at each step. Results: Baseline effective radiation doses for CT head, CTA and CTP were 1.80, 3.60 and 3.96 mSv, at currents of 300, 280 and 130–150 mA, respectively. Using AIDR 3D and final reduced currents of 160, 190 and 70–100 mA for CT head, CTA and CTP gave effective doses of 1.29, 3.18 and 2.76 mSv, respectively. Conclusion: We demonstrated that satisfactory reductions in the effective radiation dose for CT head (28.3%), CTA (11.6%) and CTP (30.1%) can be achieved without sacrificing diagnostic image quality. We have also shown that iterative reconstruction techniques such as AIDR 3D can be effectively used to help reduce effective radiation dose. The dose reductions were performed within a short period and can be easily achievable, even in busy departments.

scholarly journals New patient-controlled abdominal compression method in radiography: radiation dose and image quality

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 205846011877286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oili Piippo-Huotari ◽  
Eva Norrman ◽  
Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson ◽  
Håkan Geijer
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Abdominal Compression ◽  
Radiographic Images ◽  
Dose Area Product ◽  
Similar Dose ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Area Product

Background The radiation dose for patients can be reduced with many methods and one way is to use abdominal compression. In this study, the radiation dose and image quality for a new patient-controlled compression device were compared with conventional compression and compression in the prone position . Purpose To compare radiation dose and image quality of patient-controlled compression compared with conventional and prone compression in general radiography. Material and Methods An experimental design with quantitative approach. After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee, a consecutive sample of 48 patients was examined with the standard clinical urography protocol. The radiation doses were measured as dose-area product and analyzed with a paired t-test. The image quality was evaluated by visual grading analysis. Four radiologists evaluated each image individually by scoring nine criteria modified from the European quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. Results There was no significant difference in radiation dose or image quality between conventional and patient-controlled compression. Prone position resulted in both higher dose and inferior image quality. Conclusion Patient-controlled compression gave similar dose levels as conventional compression and lower than prone compression. Image quality was similar with both patient-controlled and conventional compression and was judged to be better than in the prone position.

Application of low-dose CT combined with model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm in oncologic patients during follow-up: dose reduction and image quality

2021 ◽  
pp. 20201223
Author(s):  
Davide Ippolito ◽  
Cesare Maino ◽  
Anna Pecorelli ◽  
Ilaria Salemi ◽  
Davide Gandola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Ct Images ◽  
Ct Attenuation ◽  
Oncologic Patients ◽  
Attenuation Values

Objectives: To compare image quality and radiation dose of CT images reconstructed with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and hybrid-iterative (HIR) algorithm in oncologic patients. Methods: 125 oncologic patients underwent both contrast-enhanced low- (100 kV), and standard (120 kV) dose CT, were enrolled. Image quality was assessed by using a 4-point Likert scale. CT attenuation values, expressed in Hounsfield unit (HU), were recorded within a regions of interest (ROI) of liver, spleen, paraspinal muscle, aortic lumen, and subcutaneous fat tissue. Image noise, expressed as standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Radiation dose were analyzed. Paired Student’s t-test was used to compare all continuous variables. Results: The overall median score assessed as image quality for CT images with the MBIR algorithm was significantly higher in comparison with HIR [4 (range 3–4) vs 3 (3-4), p = 0.017]. CT attenuation values and SD were significantly higher and lower, respectively, in all anatomic districts in images reconstructed with MBIR in comparison with HIR ones (all p < 0.001). SNR and CNR values were higher in CT images reconstructed with MBIR, reaching a significant difference in all districts (all p < 0.001). Radiation dose were significantly lower in the MBIR group compared with the HIR group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: MBIR combined with low-kV setting allows an important dose reduction in whole-body CT imaging, reaching a better image quality both qualitatively and quantitatively. Advances in knowledge: MBIR with low-dose approach allows a reduction of dose exposure, maintaining high image quality, especially in patients which deserve a longlasting follow-up.

Comparing the supine and erect pelvis radiographic examinations: an evaluation of anatomy, image quality and radiation dose

2021 ◽  
pp. 20210047
Author(s):  
Kevin Flintham ◽  
Kholoud Alzyoud ◽  
Andrew England ◽  
Peter Hogg ◽  
Beverly Snaith
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Supine Position ◽  
Pelvic Tilt ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Functional Anatomy ◽  
Dose Area Product ◽  
Sagittal Diameter ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Area Product

Objectives: Pelvis radiographs are usually acquired supine despite standing imaging reflecting functional anatomy. We compared the supine and erect radiographic examinations for anatomical features, radiation dose and image quality. Methods: Sixty patients underwent pelvis radiography in both supine and erect positions at the same examination appointment. Measures of body mass index and sagittal diameter were obtained. Images were evaluated using visual grading analysis and pelvic tilt was compared. Dose-area-product (DAP) values were recorded and inputted into the CalDose_X software to estimate effective dose (ED). The CalDose_X software allowed comparisons using data from the erect and supine sex-specific phantoms (MAX06 & FAX06). Results: Patient sagittal diameter was greater on standing with an average 20.6% increase at the iliac crest (median 30.0, interquartile range [26.0 to 34.0] cm), in comparison to the supine position [24.0 (22.3 to 28.0) cm; p < 0.001]. 57 (95%) patients had posterior pelvic tilt on weight-bearing. Erect image quality was significantly decreased with median image quality scores of 78% (69 to 85) compared to 87% for the supine position [81 to 91] (p < 0.001). In the erect position the ED was 47% higher [0.17 (0.13 to 0.33) mSv versus 0.12 (0.08 to 0.18) mSv (p < 0.001)], influenced by the increased sagittal diameter. 42 (70%) patients preferred the standing examination. Conclusion: Patient diameter and pelvic tilt were altered on weightbearing. Erect images demonstrated an overall decrease in image quality with a higher radiation dose. Optimal acquisition parameters are required for erect pelvis radiography as the supine technique is not directly transferable.

scholarly journals Electrophysiological procedures for the use of the RPC: without hindrance and negligible radiation

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-03
Author(s):  
Matvei Ilya ◽  
Vladislav Gleb
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Sensitivity Threshold ◽  
Visualization Technique ◽  
Dose Area Product ◽  
Major Benefit ◽  
Electrophysiological Procedures ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Area Product ◽  
Personal Dosimeter

Background: Fluoroscopy is the main visualization technique for EP procedures. A radiation protection cabin (RPC) shielded with 2 mm lead-equivalent walls was tested as an alternative protection tool (Cathpax®, Lemer Pax). Methods: To assess the scattered radiation to the operator inside the RPC an electronic personal dosimeter (EPD; Mk2, Thermo Electron) was placed at the neck level of the operator. A second EPD was located outside the RPC at 150 cm height from the floor, to record the presumable head radiation dose. Results: Radiation doses were measured in a total of 138 consecutive patients (age 54±16 yrs, BMI 28±5 kg/m2 (18-45), 64% male) undergoing a variety of ablation procedures (SVT=75, AFL=32, AF=17, VT=14). Median fluoroscopy time was 39 min (7-140), the cumulative dose-area product (DAP) 4702 cGy.cm2 (493-65620). Doses outside the RPC showed a median of 135 µSv (1-4881). Doses inside the RPC were detected only at sensitivity threshold or background levels (mean 0.2SD0.7 µSv, median 0.0, range 0-4). The dose reduction to the operator was highest for AF ablations (354 vs 0.5 µSv, respectively; p<0.001). The total accumulated dose outside the RPC was 37883 µSv for all 138 procedures, whereas for the protected operator inside only 30 µSv. Conclusions: There were highly concordant low dose values measured for the operator inside the RPC in comparison to high doses outside the RPC. The use of a RPC represents a major benefit over a lead apron and contributes to a significant dose reduction as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA principle).

Substantial radiation dose reduction with consistent image quality using a novel low-dose stone composition protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2971-2979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Apfaltrer ◽  
Anja Dutschke ◽  
Pascal A. T. Baltzer ◽  
Christian Schestak ◽  
Mehmet Özsoy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Radiation Dose Reduction ◽  
Stone Composition

scholarly journals 3D Assessment of Endodontic Lesions with a Low-Dose CBCT Protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Portelli ◽  
Angela Militi ◽  
Antonino Lo Giudice ◽  
Roberto Lo Giudice ◽  
Lorenzo Rustico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Organ Dose ◽  
Radiological Protection ◽  
Anthropomorphic Phantom ◽  
Organ Doses ◽  
Thermoluminescent Dosimeters ◽  
Lower Radiation Dose ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
Effective Doses

Background: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is often used in different fields of dental science, especially in complex anatomical districts like the endodontic one. The aim of this study is to propose a low-dose CBCT protocol useful in cases of endodontic lesions. Methods: The device used was a MyRay Hyperion X9-11x5; the low dose setting of the machine was 90 Kv, 27 mAs, CTDI/Vol 2.89 mGy. The absorbed organ doses have been evaluated with an anthropomorphic phantom loaded with thermoluminescent dosimeters positioned at the level of sensitive organs like brain, bone marrow, salivary glands, thyroid, esophagus, oral mucosa, extrathoracic airways, and lymph nodes. Equivalent and effective doses have been calculated; the last one has been calculated using the recommendations approved by the Main Commission of ICRP (International Commission Radiological Protection) in March 2007. For the assessment of image quality, five senior clinicians, independent and experienced clinicians, were asked to state if CBCT scans were accurate enough to assess endodontic lesions. Results: The use of a low-dose CBCT acquisition produced the lowest organ dose (5.01 microSv) at the level of the esophagus. Image quality has been considered accurate enough for endodontic diagnostic needs. Conclusions: CBCT low-dose protocol can be used over the standard one in endodontic special cases because it provides a significantly lower radiation dose to the patients while ensuring good image quality. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the opportunity of low-dose CBCT exams in endodontic clinical practice.

Assessment of image quality and radiation dose in some models of digital radiography systems – A Pehamed FLUORAD A + D phantom study

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-144
Author(s):  
H. Kaheni ◽  
A. Chaparian ◽  
R. Nafisi-Moghadam ◽  
N. Hamzian
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Digital Radiography ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Digital Systems ◽  
Quality Performance ◽  
Dose Area Product ◽  
Ideal Situation ◽  
Conventional Film ◽  
Area Product

Digital radiography (DR) systems have been recently introduced as a developed technology that is replacing conventional film–screen systems in many countries around the world. Ideal situation in radiography is to maximize the image quality while minimizing the patient dose. The purpose of this study was to compare image quality and radiation dose in different digital radiography systems. Four different digital systems are compared in terms of their image quality performance and dose area product (DAP). Images of Pehamed FLUORAD A + D phantom were obtained for each DR system. Image quality parameters (contrast resolution (CR), spatial resolution (SR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)) and DAP were significantly different between different digital systems. It was shown that all four quantities increased with increasing exposure parameters in all systems. Image quality parameters of the SEDECAL system were higher than that in other systems (p ≤ 0.05). At the stable DAP (100 mGy.cm2), means of CR, CNR, and SR in the SEDECAL system were 6.38 ± 0.797, 29.70 ± 0.85 and 3.10 ± 0.38 lp/mm, respectively. The results of this investigation can be taken into consideration in the selection and purchasing of new systems in order to preserve patients as well as radiographers from unnecessary radiation dose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document