Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI of the breast: can contrast agent injection rate impact background parenchymal enhancement?

2021 ◽  
pp. 028418512110340
Author(s):  
Flaminia Marzocca ◽  
Giuliana Moffa ◽  
Valerio Nispi Landi ◽  
Giovanna Panzironi ◽  
Miles A Kirchin ◽  
...  

Background Normal background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is a dynamic parameter affected by multiple factors. Purpose To determine whether contrast agent injection rate affects the degree of BPE in women undergoing breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Material and Methods A total of 85 patients included in our prospective study randomly received 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol at a rate of 3 mL/s (group A; n = 46) or 2 mL/s (group B; n = 39). Breast MRI was performed at 3T using a standard protocol including postcontrast axial 3D GRE T1-weighted sequences. Two expert breast radiologists, blinded to clinical and radiological information, independently quantified BPE on early postcontrast subtracted images, assigning a score of 1–4. Mean comparison and regression analysis were performed to assess the influence of injection rate on BPE. Results Groups were homogeneous in terms of age and final BI-RADS score. The mean BPE score was significantly lower among patients in group A (mean of two readers: 1.36 vs. 1.90; P < 0.01) with 70%–72% of patients assigned a BPE score of 1, compared with 36%–38% of patients in group B. Lower BPE scores were noted with the higher flow rate in subgroup analyses of both pre- and postmenopausal women, although the effect was more evident in premenopausal women. Regression analysis confirmed that the likelihood of a BPE 1 score was significantly increased with a higher flow rate ( P < 0.01). The inter-reader agreement was excellent (0.83). Conclusion A higher contrast agent injection flow rate (3 mL/s) during breast MRI significantly reduces the degree of BPE, potentially allowing improved diagnostic accuracy by reducing false-positive and false-negative findings.

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2641-2647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valencia King ◽  
Yajia Gu ◽  
Jennifer B. Kaplan ◽  
Jennifer D. Brooks ◽  
Malcolm C. Pike ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (12) ◽  
pp. 1600-1607
Author(s):  
Roxanna Hellgren ◽  
Ariel Saracco ◽  
Fredrik Strand ◽  
Mikael Eriksson ◽  
Ann Sundbom ◽  
...  

Background Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of normal tissue at breast magnetic resonance imaging is suggested to be an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Its association with established risk factors for breast cancer is not fully investigated. Purpose To study the association between BPE and risk factors for breast cancer in a healthy, non-high-risk screening population. Material and Methods We measured BPE and mammographic density and used data from self-reported questionnaires in 214 healthy women aged 43–74 years. We estimated odds ratios for the univariable association between BPE and risk factors. We then fitted an adjusted model using logistic regression to evaluate associations between BPE (high vs. low) and risk factors, including mammographic breast density. Results The majority of women had low BPE (84%). In a multivariable model, we found statistically significant associations between BPE and age ( P = 0.002) and BMI ( P = 0.03). We did find a significant association between systemic progesterone medication and BPE, but due to small numbers, the results should be interpreted with caution. The adjusted odds ratio for high BPE was 3.1 among women with density D (compared to B) and 2.1 for density C (compared to B). However, the association between high BPE and density was not statistically significant. We did not find statistically significant associations with any other risk factors. Conclusion Our study confirmed the known association of BPE with age and BMI. Although our results show a higher likelihood for high BPE with increasing levels of mammographic density, the association was not statistically significant.


Radiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 292 (3) ◽  
pp. 552-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Thompson ◽  
Indika Mallawaarachchi ◽  
Durgesh K. Dwivedi ◽  
Anoop P. Ayyappan ◽  
Navkiran K. Shokar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 212 (6) ◽  
pp. 1412-1418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy A. Sippo ◽  
Geoffrey M. Rutledge ◽  
Kristine S. Burk ◽  
Sarah F. Mercaldo ◽  
Brian N. Dontchos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document