scholarly journals Prophylactic uterine artery embolization in second-trimester pregnancy termination with complete placenta previa

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 345-352
Author(s):  
Yinfeng Wang ◽  
Changchang Hu ◽  
Ningpin Pan ◽  
Chaolu Chen ◽  
Ruijin Wu

Objective This study was performed to assess whether prophylactic uterine artery embolization (UAE) is beneficial for second-trimester abortion with complete placenta previa (CPP). Methods Patients with CPP who underwent second-trimester pregnancy termination by labor induction with or without UAE from January 2010 to January 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 25 patients were eligible for analysis. The primary outcomes were the abortion success rate and bleeding volume, and the secondary outcomes were the induction-to-abortion time, length of hospital stay, and complications. Results CPP occurred in all 25 patients. Fifteen patients underwent prophylactic UAE (UAE group) and 10 did not (control group). Abortion was successful in 13 of 15 (86.7%) women in the UAE group and in 9 of 10 (90.0%) women in the control group. There was no significant difference in the bleeding volume or induction-to-abortion time between the two groups. The hospital stay was longer and pyrexia was more common in the UAE than control group. Conclusion Prophylactic UAE did not markedly improve the outcomes of second-trimester abortion in patients with CPP. Conversely, it may increase the risk of complications and prolong the hospital stay.

Author(s):  
Abhijeet Kumar ◽  
Raju Agarwal

Background: The addition of dinoprostone gel (PGE2) to standard regimen of second trimester abortion using vaginal misoprostol (PGE1) reduces failure rate and decrease induction abortion time interval. We evaluated the role and efficacy of vaginal dinoprostone gel with vaginal misoprostol in women undergoing second trimester abortion. Objective of present study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of vaginal dinoprostone gel plus vaginal misoprostol for second trimester termination of pregnancy.Methods: This study was a prospective cohort involving 100 women with 12-20 weeks gestation requesting termination of pregnancy. In study group 0.5mg dinoprostone gel applied vaginally followed by 400µg misoprostol every four hourly (max 3 doses) after six hours of dinoprostone gel application. The mean age of the women study was 27.2 years and mean gestational age was 18.9 weeks. The primary effectiveness of the study was the efficacy of the treatment to terminate pregnancy at 20 hrs. Secondary outcomes were induction abortion interval, failure rate, side effects. statistical analysis of study was carried out using chi square test.Results: At 20 hours, the complete abortion rate was 100%. Within 16 hours 98% women aborted without any significant side effects. Mean induction abortion interval was 14.56 hours.Conclusions: Combination of vaginal dinoprostone gel (PGE2) plus misoprostol (PGE1) is effective, safe and alternate method for second trimester pregnancy termination with. In this protocol induction to abortion interval time is less as compared to other methods of second trimester pregnancy termination.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
Patricia Perez-Moneo Perez ◽  
Nerea Ruiz Sacedon ◽  
Belen Aparicio Navarro ◽  
Jorge Gomez Valdes ◽  
Reyes Balanza Chancosa

Author(s):  
Suryaprakash Jagdevappa Karande ◽  
Meena Shantanu Gunjotikar

Background: The methods of terminating pregnancy in the first trimester are simple, safe and effective. Factors like lack of knowledge about availability of MTP services, ignorance, denial of pregnancy, fear of society may account for decrease in number of first trimester abortions. The aims of the present study were to compare the efficacy, induction abortion interval and side effects of intravaginal misoprostol with extra amniotic installation of ethacridine lactate for second trimester abortion.Methods: 60 women coming to MTP clinics requesting second trimester pregnancy termination between 12 to 20 weeks were selected. Detail history and examination was carried out in each patient. They divided into two groups, Group A (30) intravaginal misoprostol 400 initially followed by 400 micrograns every 6 hourly if required. Group B (30) extra-amniotic 0.1% ethacridine lactate 150 cc.Results: In Group A success rate was 100% while in Group B it was 76.66%, which is highly statistically significant (P< 0.01). Mean I – A interval in Group A was 14.58+5.25 hours was highly significantly less than in Group B, it was 33.91 + 3.97 hours (p<0.0001). In Group A complete abortion has occurred in 28 cases (93.33%) and in Group B in 12 cases (52.17%).Conclusions: We conclude that, as compared to extra-amniotic instillation of ethacridinelactate intravaginal misoprostol is the preferred regimen in second trimester abortion because of its high efficacy, shorter induction abortion interval, high incidence of completeness of abortion, low incidence of side effects and better tolerance by the patient. 


Author(s):  
Sium AF ◽  
◽  
Tilahun A ◽  
Mersha A ◽  
Yihun S ◽  
...  

Background: A transvaginal septum occurs if these two tissue groups do not fuse properly by 5 months of embryonic life. The recommended mode of safe termination for second trimester pregnancy with a diagnosis of high transverse vaginal septum is cervical preparation followed by septostomy and dilation and curettage. Case Summary: A 28 years-old gravida-II Para-I (alive by CS for unknown indication) presented at gestational age 15 weeks plus 6. Hysterotomy was done for an indication of septic inevitable missed second trimester abortion plus presumptive diagnosis of high vaginal septum. Conclusion: According to the case reports that has been reported, the recommended management for safe termination of second trimester pregnancy with a diagnosis of transvaginal septum is good cervical preparation followed by septostomy and dilation and curettage (D&E).


Author(s):  
Zinkal P. Kothadiya ◽  
Bhavesh B. Airao ◽  
Bipin R. Shah

Background: Second-trimester pregnancy termination comprises 10 to 15 percent of the approximately 42 million abortions performed annually worldwide.  Second-trimester procedures can be performed either with medication or by mechanical methods (Foleys catheter) or surgically by dilation and evacuation (D and E) or hysterotomy. The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Tablet Misoprostol and extra amniotic infusion of normal saline with balloon catheter in second trimester abortion, to find out the maternal outcome, to compare the induction- to delivery interval between tablet misoprostol and extra amniotic infusion of normal saline with balloon catheter and to compare the cost of induction between tablet misoprostol and extra amniotic infusion of normal saline   with balloon catheter.Methods: This randomized controlled study was carried out in the Obstetrics and Gynecology. Department of C.U. Shah Medical College, Surendranagar, from 23th August 2017 to 20th August 2018.Results: Amongst the 100 participants, 50 induction is done with tab. Misoprostol and 50 induction done with EASIBC. Success rate is higher in tab. Misoprost which is 90.20% and in EASIBC is 75.51%. There were longer induction abortion interval in EASIBC: Need for curettage among Misoprostol is 5 and EASIBC is 9. Major complication like PPH occurred in two cases in induction with tab. Misoprostol, which is managed by further intervention and no death occurred. No major complication occurred in induction with EASIBC.Conclusions: Excluding the side effects and complications, which are manageable induction with tab. Misoprostol is better than EASIBC in terms of induction abortion interval, effectiveness, acceptability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document