scholarly journals Diagnosis and therapy using double-balloon endoscopy for small bowel disease: experience from a Chinese tertiary hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 030006052095948
Author(s):  
Anning Yin ◽  
Wei Hu ◽  
Liang Zhao ◽  
Yijuan Ding ◽  
Honggang Yu

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) for small bowel disease (SBD). Methods The clinical and endoscopic data of patients who underwent DBE in a Chinese tertiary hospital from January 2006 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into three groups by age: the young group (<45 years), middle-aged group (45–65 years), and older group (>65 years). Results In total, 1177 patients who underwent 2134 DBE procedures were included. The anterograde and retrograde route was used in 1111 and 1023 procedures, respectively. The most common reason for performing DBE was suspected small bowel bleeding (SSBB) (53.1%), and the most common SBD was Crohn's disease (CD) (18.1%). Hemostasis was the predominant endoscopic therapy (54.3%). The total complication rate was 0.8%. The incidence of CD was highest in the young group, and the incidence of tumors was highest in the older group; these findings were consistent both among the overall patient population and among patients with SSBB. Conclusions DBE is effective and safe for the diagnosis and treatment of SBD and is considered to have great potential as a first-line method for diagnosing SBD.

2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Fukumoto ◽  
Shinji Tanaka ◽  
Takayoshi Shishido ◽  
Yoshito Takemura ◽  
Shiro Oka ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 2428-2436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Wada ◽  
Alan T. Lefor ◽  
Hiroyuki Mutoh ◽  
Tomonori Yano ◽  
Yoshikazu Hayashi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. AB221
Author(s):  
J. Antonio Quiros ◽  
Sarah Boushey ◽  
Elizabeth A. Ruben ◽  
Brandy Lu ◽  
Phil McDonald

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 63-65
Author(s):  
Shintaro Akabane ◽  
Takahisa Suzuki ◽  
Takao Hinoi ◽  
Yosuke Shimizu ◽  
Takeshi Sudo ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. AB179
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Matsui ◽  
Takehiko Seki ◽  
Kenshi Yao ◽  
Suketo Sou ◽  
Fumihito Hirai ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 40-44
Author(s):  
Dinesh Rangika Perera ◽  
Piyal Rangana ◽  
Sanjeewa Aryasingha

Background: Since its global introduction in 2000, capsule endoscopy (CE) has revolutionized the evaluation of small bowel disease. Aims and Objective: The aim of this study was to share our experience with CE including the findings and its diagnostic yield. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out at Colombo South Teaching Hospital of Sri Lanka. Data of patients who underwent CE from its initiation in 2017 until June 2020 were obtained from the hospital computer database. These included the patient demographics, indications for the study, quality of bowel preparation, and its findings. Results: The study included 54 patients with a mean age of 55 years. Mean gastric time and small bowel transit time were 52 and 272 min, respectively. Forty-five CE studies were done for the evaluation of small bowel bleeding and an abnormal study was found in 26 (57.78%) patients. Small intestinal ulcers and erosions were the most frequently found abnormality (n=16, 35.56%) followed by tumors (n=5, 11.11%). Active bleeding was evident in 14 (31.11%) patients. Overall diagnostic yield was higher in those with a history of overt bleeding (n=15, 71.43%) compared to occult bleeding (n=11, 45.83%). Most patients who were evaluated for abdominal pain and diarrhea had normal CE except for two who had small intestinal ulcers and subepithelial lesions. Only one case was complicated with capsule retention. Conclusion: CE is a useful investigation for the evaluation of small bowel disease, particularly in suspected small bowel bleeding. In contrast to western population, ulcers and erosions were the more frequently found abnormalities seen in local setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document