scholarly journals Deep exploration of PARP inhibitors in breast cancer: monotherapy and combination therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006052199101
Author(s):  
Zheling Chen ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
Xiao Li ◽  
Yucheng Zhou ◽  
Ke Chen
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Free Survival

Objective Nearly 5% of patients with breast cancer carry germline BRCA mutations, which are more common in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Previous clinical trials demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) against BRCA-mutated metastatic breast cancer. The current study conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of the clinical efficiency and safety of PARPis, either alone or combined with chemotherapy, in patients with TNBC. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized controlled trials comparing PARPi therapy with chemotherapy, and comparisons of chemotherapy plus PARPis with chemotherapy alone were included. The study endpoints included the clinical response, progression-free survival, and adverse event rates. Results PARPi therapy was revealed to improve progression-free survival in patients with advanced breast cancer, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis illustrated that patients with mutant BRCA1 and mutant BRCA2 and those who had not been treated with platinum-based agents could specifically benefit from PARPis. Conclusion PARPi monotherapy can significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer, especially those with TNBC, those who had not previously received platinum therapy, and those with mutant BRCA1/2. PARPis combined with chemotherapy represent new treatment options for patients with advanced cancer.

scholarly journals Updates on managing advanced breast cancer with palbociclib combination therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 175883591879384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa M. McShane ◽  
Thomas A. Wolfe ◽  
Joanne C. Ryan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Subgroup Analyses

Background: The objective of this study was to review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of palbociclib, a first-in-class cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods: Pharmacokinetics and drug interactions associated with palbociclib are described. Recent clinical trial data are reviewed, including patient-reported outcomes and subgroup analyses. Results: Palbociclib is indicated in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as initial endocrine therapy (ET) or with fulvestrant for patients with disease progression following ET for hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative ABC or metastatic breast cancer. Palbociclib inhibits cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6, resulting in a blockade of phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein, which hinders the activation of transcription factors involved in S-phase entry, thereby arresting cell cycle progression at G1 phase. The efficacy and safety of palbociclib in combination with ET was established in three randomized trials (PALOMA-1, -2, and -3); all studies met their primary endpoint of significantly prolonging investigator-assessed progression-free survival versus ET alone. Findings were similar in subgroup analyses of the three PALOMA studies. Palbociclib plus ET also maintained health-related quality of life (QoL) compared with ET alone in PALOMA-2 and -3. A long-term safety profile for palbociclib, up to 3 years, has been established. Neutropenia, the most common any-grade and grade 3 or higher adverse event associated with palbociclib, is consistent with the drug’s mechanism of action and can be effectively managed with dose interruption, dose reduction, or delay in starting treatment cycles. Conclusions: Palbociclib in combination with ET improved progression-free survival and QoL in patients with ABC, including in several patient subgroups.

scholarly journals Network meta-analysis of eribulin versus other chemotherapies used as second- or later-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Zhao ◽  
Rachel Hughes ◽  
Binod Neupane ◽  
Kristin Mickle ◽  
Yun Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Eribulin mesylate (ERI; Halaven®) is a microtubule inhibitor approved in the United States for metastatic breast cancer patients with at least two prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic breast cancer, and in the European Union in locally advanced breast cancer or metastatic breast cancer patients who progressed after at least one chemotherapy for advanced disease. This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of ERI versus other chemotherapies in this setting. Methods Systematic searches conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials identified randomized controlled trials of locally advanced breast cancer/metastatic breast cancer chemotherapies in second- or later-line settings. Efficacy assessment included pre-specified subgroup analysis of breast cancer subtypes. Included studies were assessed for quality using the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination tool. Bayesian network meta-analysis estimated primary outcomes of overall survival and progression-free survival using fixed-effect models. Comparators included: capecitabine (CAP), gemcitabine (GEM), ixabepilone (IXA), utidelone (UTI), treatment by physician’s choice (TPC), and vinorelbine (VIN). Results The network meta-analysis included seven trials. Results showed that second- or later-line patients treated with ERI had statistically longer overall survival versus TPC (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81; credible interval [CrI]: 0.66–0.99) or GEM+VIN (0.62; 0.42–0.90) and statistically longer progression-free survival versus TPC (0.76; 0.64–0.90), but statistically shorter progression-free survival versus CAP+IXA (1.40; 1.17–1.67) and CAP+UTI (1.61; 1.23–2.12). In triple negative breast cancer, ERI had statistically longer overall survival versus CAP (0.70; 0.54–0.90); no statistical differences in progression-free survival were observed in triple negative breast cancer. Conclusions This network meta-analysis suggests that ERI may provide an overall survival benefit in the overall locally advanced breast cancer/metastatic breast cancer populations and triple negative breast cancer subgroup compared to standard treatments. These findings support the use of ERI in second- or later-line treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer/metastatic breast cancer.

The impact of radiological assessment schedules on progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1086-1086
Author(s):  
Dor Reuven Dabush ◽  
Daniel Shepshelovich ◽  
Tzippy Shochat ◽  
Eitan Amir ◽  
Ariadna Tibau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Radiological Assessment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

1086 Background: The impact of the interval of radiological assessment on the magnitude of benefit observed in randomized trials (RCTs) in metastatic breast cancer is undefined. Methods: All RCTs investigating anti-neoplastic drugs for metastatic breast cancer published between 2006 and 2019 were identified. Intervals for restaging were categorized as short ( < 9 weeks) or long (≥9 weeks). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall-survival (OS) were pooled in a meta-analysis and compared between trials employing short and long restaging intervals assessed as subgroup analyses. Analyses were repeated for pre-specified subgroups according to disease subtype, drug type, whether experimental therapy was added to or replaced standard treatment and whether HR for PFS was < 1 or ≥1. Results: Eighty-nine studies comprising 95 comparisons and 44,901 patients were included. The magnitude of PFS benefit was non-significantly larger in trials which employed short compared to long restaging intervals (HR 0.79 vs. 0.86, p = 0.15). Short restaging interval was associated with significantly higher magnitude of effect on PFS in pre-specified subgroups including non-first line studies (HR 0.78 vs. 0.92, p = 0.04), studies with drugs replacing standard treatment (HR 0.86 vs. 1.04, p = 0.02) and studies performed exclusively in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive disease (HR 0.72 vs. 0.90, p = 0.02). Restaging interval was not associated with OS for all included studies (HR 0.92 vs. 0.93, p = 0.66) or for any of the pre-specified subgroups. Conclusions: Shorter restaging intervals are associated with a higher magnitude of effect of PFS, but not OS. Awareness of the impact of the restaging interval on quantification of intermediate endpoints such as PFS is important for the design and interpretation of RCTs.

AMEERA-5: A randomized, double-blind phase III study of amcenestrant (SAR439859) + palbociclib versus letrozole + palbociclib for previously untreated ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1104-TPS1104
Author(s):  
Aditya Bardia ◽  
Javier Cortes ◽  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
Suzette Delaloge ◽  
Hiroji Iwata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Study

TPS1104 Background: Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) block estrogen receptor (ER) associated signaling and have created interest for treating patients (pts) with advanced ER+ breast cancer (BC). Fulvestrant is currently the only SERD available for advanced BC but requires intramuscular administration, limiting the applied dose, exposure and receptor engagement. Amcenestrant (SAR439859) is an oral SERD that binds with high affinity to both wild-type and mutant ER, blocking estradiol binding and promoting up to 98% ER degradation in preclinical studies. In the phase I AMEERA-1 study of pretreated pts with ER+/HER2- advanced BC, amcenestrant 150–600 mg once daily (QD) showed a mean ER occupancy of 94% with plasma concentrations > 100 ng/mL and a favorable safety profile (Bardia, 2019; data on file). Combination therapy with amcenestrant + palbociclib (palbo) was also evaluated as part of this ongoing phase I study. CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI), the gold standard for first line treatment for advanced breast cancer, prolong progression free survival (PFS) in pts with no prior treatment for ER+/HER2- advanced BC, but OS benefit has not been shown yet in postmenopausal pts. There remains a clinical need for more effective treatments in this setting. Methods: AMEERA-5 (NCT04478266) is an ongoing, prospective, randomized, double-blind phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of amcenestrant + palbo with that of letrozole + palbo in pts with advanced, locoregional recurrent or metastatic ER+/HER2- BC who have not received prior systemic therapy for advanced disease. The study includes men, pre/peri-menopausal (with goserelin) and post-menopausal women. Pts with progression during or within 12 months of (neo)adjuvant endocrine therapy using any of the following agents are excluded: AI, selective estrogen receptor modulators, CDK4/6i. Pts are randomized 1:1 to either continuous amcenestrant 200 mg or letrozole 2.5 mg QD orally with matching placebos; both combined with palbo 125 mg QD orally (d1–21 every 28-d cycle). Randomization is stratified according to disease type (de novo metastatic vs recurrent disease), the presence of visceral metastasis, and menopausal status. The primary endpoint is investigator assessed progression free survival (PFS) (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints are overall survival, PFS2, objective response rate, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, pharmacokinetics of amcenestrant and palbo, health-related quality of life, time to chemotherapy, and safety. Biomarkers will be measured in paired tumor biopsies and cell free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) over time. Target enrolment = 1066 pts; enrolment as of 1/2021 = 33 pts. Bardia A, et al., J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37 (15 suppl):1054 Clinical trial information: NCT04478266 .

scholarly journals Peripheral cytotoxic T lymphocyte predicts first-line progression free survival in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer

The Breast ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
Xiao-Ran Liu ◽  
Jian-Jun Yu ◽  
Guo-Hong Song ◽  
Li-Jun Di ◽  
Han-Fang Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
T Lymphocyte ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Free Survival
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document